Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"A Presidency On Life Support"...from pollingreport.com newsletter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:41 PM
Original message
"A Presidency On Life Support"...from pollingreport.com newsletter
Aaahhhhh! I love it! :D

A Presidency On Life Support

The George W. Bush presidency is on life support. At first, these words seem harsh and overstated. For starters, Bush has more than a thousand days left in office. He can nominate Supreme Court justices and get them confirmed, as the 78 to 22 Senate vote for John Roberts so easily demonstrates. He also wields other important constitutional powers, including the veto which he can use to impose his will on a recalcitrant Congress. Finally, he retains considerable diplomatic and war powers at his disposal. But for the remainder of his presidency, George W. Bush will govern without the consent of the governed.

That last fact has been underscored by a flurry of recent public polls. In nearly all of them, Bush’s job approval is hovering at 40%. Behind the job approval numbers are many other signs of a presidency in trouble. A Democracy Corps survey finds 58% want to go in a significantly different direction away from Bush; 56% believe he is "in over his head;" and 44% say they are "finished" with him.

<snip>

After claiming victory, Bush told reporters he had acquired "political capital, and now I intend to spend it . . . Social Security and tax reform, moving this economy forward, education, fighting and winning the war on terror." This accumulation of capital was evident in a Gallup poll taken two weeks after his second inauguration: 57% approved of Bush’s performance, 40% disapproved. As of mid-September, those figures were reversed: 40% approved of Bush’s job performance, while 58% disapproved, according to Gallup. Just nine months into his second term, Bush’s political capital is all but spent. If he were a bank, he’d have to declare bankruptcy.

A look behind the polls explains why. Not only are Bush’s overall approval ratings low and doubts about his leadership growing, but on a variety of issues he has been judged seriously deficient. A Zogby International survey gives Bush poor marks on a host of domestic and foreign concerns (see Table 1, below). Overall, the ratio of poor-to-excellent scores ranges from a low of 1:1 (managing the war on terror and Hurricane Rita) to a high of 8:1 (handling gasoline prices). If this were a parliamentary system, there would be a vote of no confidence and a new election held...

Much more at link


"But for the remainder of his presidency, George W. Bush will govern without the consent of the governed."

You got that shit right, my friend...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pull the plug! Pull the plug!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Absolutely should! They said it's "fatal"...
The remainder of the Bush presidency will be more about limits, since his status has suffered a fatal blow.

Not "crippling"...not "severe"...FATAL!
BWAAAhahahaha! Pull the plug!!
:evilgrin:
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I've seen the video, and this administration is clearly
in a vegetative state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Atommom, that's a PERSISTENT vegetative state!
Hmmm, you just gave me an idea for a comic that will probably be in bad taste.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Well, just be sure to post the link here then!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You know I will! I'll even give you a shout out
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 07:25 PM by Neil Lisst
Atommom, Thanks, and we will link DU and mention you as the idea source if we do one. It's gonna be in bad taste, but it has to done.

We always link any person or group who plays a role in our comic that day. I think our shout out to the posters and mods here at DU will go up tonight at midnight. We'll keep it up a couple of days. It's the least I can do with our readers. We've been read in 52 countries so far.

I like to acknowledge influences, and why not? People are too selfish with recognition. Share the wealth.


My cartoonist partner is Canadian, and we are both very much dedicated to commenting on the body politic. 90% of our stuff is harsh on the right, but we've been hammering Dems for not gutting it up more and sooner, too.

It's a challenge to find something to say every day that can be communicated in two frames and a few words. We want the comic to informative, and we want to get more people in the 18-30 demographic caring, registering, and voting.

I love to post on politics, and posting stimulates my writing in the comic and other things.

To others ... sorry if I was wordy and off topic any. I'm ON the Bush administration full time, and my comic is a POLITICAL comic, a running commentary on the same things we discuss here.

I'm not sure about posting a link to my comic any more. I see them in people's signatures, but I don't know. You can google my name and find the comic. It's easy to find, and in more languages than just English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. If you're a political junkie, you've come to the right place.
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 08:29 AM by atommom
DU is all politics and snarkiness, 24/7. ;)

(Edited to add that if you don't want to post your link directly, you can still put your website URL in your user profile, if you like. That's another option.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #30
45. atommom, we're still working on it
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 11:01 AM by Neil Lisst
We've been working on this idea for two days now, using your comment as the starting point. I've written it several ways, and we've just about got it where we want it. We're planning on using it this Friday.

We have a number I've already written, sort of generic days, but we much prefer running with some hot topic that is NOW. We can do what most cannot - produce overnight a timely commentary.

This one for Friday will be up all weekend, so we are making it a little more than the norm. Be looking for it. We give you and the DU a Shout Out and you a specific thanks for the idea.

Tomorrow will be about Bush, Rove and the Constitution.

http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. and it is days like this
when I say....

In the course of human affairs, and all that ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. "govern without the consent of the governed"? Not if Dems take the House!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. he's never had the consent of the governed, thanks to BBV and other
voting abuses.

What's sad to me is that gas prices, for which he probably bears less responsibility than for many other problems, is what is pushing the people out of the approve column and into the disapprove. Apparently the hundreds of examples of outrageously bad management and poor stewardship of the countries' resources aren't enough for them, but paying $3 per gallon hits them on their long exurban commutes, so THAT matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verse18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Also, I think
people realized their elderly parents would have to choose between food, heat this winter and their medications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm big in to energy conservation. Yank the plug right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It would be his wish...
"We can all pitch in . . . by being better conservers of energy."

--Shrub, 9/26/05--

Pull the plug!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. he conserves energy, all right, his OWN !


takes lots of vacations, goes to bed early ...works hard at it !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. And Very "Conservative" at that!
Good call, Lastlaughin08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Love the blunt language; love the message. I'm almost afraid to believe it though!:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fascinating Read
I don't know how to kick" but if I did I would. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Youy just did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. "How you win determines how you govern."
GREAT article. This part was interesting:

<snip>

The Lost Center
By itself, George W. Bush’s inability to capture significant Democratic backing is not crippling to his presidency. But his failure to win support from independents and moderates imperils his Administration’s future. Until 2004, it was believed that these two groups were crucial to winning elections and establishing a governing coalition. Bush has proved this maxim requires rethinking. According to the 2004 exit poll, John Kerry won 49% backing from independents to Bush’s 48%. Among moderates, the Kerry advantage was even more decisive: 54% to 45%. Knowing that the president could not count on independents and moderates, Bush campaign strategist Karl Rove decided he had to find more Republicans and get them to the polls. The so-called "72-Hour Task Force" Rove designed masterfully accomplished this objective, and sent Democrats off trying to replicate it.

But the limits of Bush’s strategy are apparent. Since winning reelection, Bush has continued to shed independent and moderate support. On nearly every major issue presidential disapproval among independents and moderates is higher than the national average (see Table 2, below). By reducing his base of support to hard-core Republicans, Bush has insured that the politics of polarization will continue. As historian Arthur M. Schlesinger once observed (in The Cycles of American History), ideology is the curse of public affairs "because it converts politics into a branch of theology and sacrifices human beings on the altar of dogma." Independents and moderates believe they are being sacrificed by an ideological president and a Congress that fails to provide the concrete results they crave.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. "Karl Rove decided he had to find more Republicans..."
Oh, he did that all right...he invented them right out of thin air.

Pigfucker. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Cross-posted in GD with link to this thread. Nominated.
Thanks Career Prole for posting this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. "If this were a parliamentary system, there would be a vote of no confiden
"If this were a parliamentary system, there would be a vote of no confidence and a new election held...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Topaz Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Great stuff!
Schadenfreude is a beautiful thing. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. I love that picture!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. when they fall apart enough, we can drown "it" in a bathtub
This pResidency will leave a mark, but we can heal if we ever get rid of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm with others calling for the PLUG to be PULLED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Oh, *'s Polls Are Even Lower
GOP base losing faith in Bush: poll
October 8, 2005 - BY WILL LESTER

"Only 28 percent say the country is headed in the right direction, while 66 percent say it is on the wrong track, the poll found. Those most likely to have lost confidence include white evangelicals, down 30 percentage points since November, Republican women, down 28 points, Southerners, down 26 points, and suburban men, down 20 points.

''Bush is trying to get more support generally from the American public by seeming more moderate ... at the same time he has a rebellion within his own party,'' Thurber said.

Bush's job approval is at the lowest level of his presidency -- 39 percent."
AP


http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-poll08.html

And don't forget the top Google Search for "FAILURE:"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=failure&btnG=Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
26. But, have you read this disturbing and revealing passage...
"Democrats can’t take solace from Bush’s weaknesses. While they may win several of the off-year congressional elections by default, voters hardly see them in a favorable light."



"As long as Democrats remain the party of Bill (and Hillary) Clinton, large numbers of southern and rural voters will view them as hostile to their cultural values. That means Democrats will struggle in presidential contests, since making the values connection is an essential prerequisite to getting a hearing on more tangible economic issues favorable to their cause. If Democrats cannot fix their values problems and Republicans continue to disappoint, voters may turn instead to a third-party candidate."

Not an encouraging prognosis for our side, I fear. SG

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. Dems don't have a "values" problem
They do, however, have a problem in letting R's define issues for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. I am begining to think that we need our base and screw the reds
I was looking at a Pew Poll and the break down of available voters who are Dems, liberals and conservative dems- and then undecideds and the young--we have a shot at good numbers, and IF ..we can get out the vote- get people who don't vote to become involved we can play to our base- srengthen our base and forget those who have drank deeply of the cool aide and continue to fight their imaginary cultural wars.

http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=949
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. He has NEVER had my consent. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I was just going to post the same thing. BushCo is ILLEGITIMATE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Selection 2000 E-Vote 2004 nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
31. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
32. Dems not benefitting from Bush's weaknesses
This part is interesting..

Democrats can’t take solace from Bush’s weaknesses. While they may win several of the off-year congressional elections by default, voters hardly see them in a favorable light. A CBS News poll (October 3-5) finds only 43% have a favorable view of congressional Democrats. One reason Bush was able to best Al Gore and John Kerry was the Democrats’ continued weaknesses on values issues. According to Zogby polling, Bill Clinton would beat George W. Bush by just two points, while John Kerry would lose again by one point. Moreover, the current Democracy Corps poll gives Democrats just 48% of the congressional ballots -- exactly the same percentages that Gore and Kerry received against Bush. As Stan Greenberg and James Carville write, "Democrats are leaving a lot of votes on the table."

snip

The authors trip themselves up, however, but insisting Dems need to focus on "values" (ie Guns, God 'n Gays) to win voters - right wing bs for sure.

Dems will only dig themselves deeper into trouble unless they start a serious effort to educate voters about real issues and Bush's failures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. I think Dean has the right idea. The "third force" has to be us.
We can't count on an as-yet undefined third party to come save us (or damn us). We have the passion and commitment to the root values that's needed within the Democratic party. It's just not currently represented enough in our Congresscritters and other elected reps. That can and has to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
35. Dr. Kavorkian! Next patient!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
36. capital is like money and a fool and his money are soon parted...
moron never had any capital to begin with, real or imagined, however, if he believed that he had some monopoly money, well, he pissed it all away.

Then there is the old adage, "don't spend it all in one place". Again, if moron* had really accumulated any funny money, he spent it all on iraq.

that's kind of his mantra isn't it? piss and wish.

colossal racist paranoid failure*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
37. Katrina was the "tipping point".. Murkins got to see Katrina/Iraq.....
On a split screen in their heads. The light bulbs came on.. It's all downhill from here. Pray Rove is indicted....Murkins will see 9/11/Iraq/Plame and the bulbs will go off again. Bad intell? Or bad people!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
38. Too early to do a victory dance and declare Bush finished
He'll find a way to pull something out of his ass.

Watch what happens to the poll numbers if Osama bin Laden is captured or if there's another terror attack.

It'll be rally round the flag once again.

A lot of these people who now say they now disapprove of Bush voted for him before. It wouldn't take much for some of them to fall back in love with him -- sort of like an abused spouse forgiving and making excuses for the abuser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. They mention those very occurrences, and say even that
probably won't help...

Even a big news story -- be it the capture of Osama bin Laden, or another terrorist strike --probably won’t help Bush that much. A recent Gallup poll, for example, finds 55% believing Bin Laden will likely be captured or killed. This finding suggests that the public may have already accounted for this event. Still, were this to happen, Bush’s support would rise. Yet, each time something positive has happened to Bush, his opinion "bounce" has gotten smaller. For example, prior to Saddam Hussein’s capture, Bush received 50% approval; afterwards, his support rose to just 55%. Another spectacular terrorist attack is also unlikely to produce a reprise of the post-September 11th "let’s-rally-round-the-president" phenomenon. Rather, any assault would renew cries of the nation’s unpreparedness -- a criticism that has special resonance following Hurricane Katrina.


Nah...he's toast. Pull that plug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Darn those college professors...
Always professing to know stuff! Like facts and history and how to analyze and stuff.

/facetiousness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. The conservapig movement will not end with shrub
they will dump him and move on and say that their ideas are right but that shurb was not up to doing things properly.

I am concerned about the man that comes after shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
42. The political capital was an illusion, arrogantly stated as not.
It was a matter of time before the facts forced themselves to the surface, revealing the illusion as what it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. so much for his political capital
The silly bastard couldn't find oil in Texas in the 1980s.

He couldn't hit water if he fell out of a boat.



http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC