"The Ohio Insurgency":
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/11/paul_hackett.html"Friendly Fire":
http://www.motherjones.com/news/update/2005/10/hackett.htmlMan, I wish I could paste more than 3 paragraphs. Tons of great quotes here. If we reject this guy, masochism reigns. Here's a sampling from the second article, entitled, "Friendly Fire.":
<snip>
Hackett, who says he’s still considering his options, is less sanguine—and less diplomatic. “The Democratic Party is like an addict,” he says. “They’re addicted to failure. I want to help the party. The question is, how do you help someone that doesn’t want help?”
Brown dismisses the controversy his decision has sparked as a “tempest in a teapot.” He insists that “nobody recruited me to run against Paul Hackett.” And though Hackett says Brown told him point-blank that he wasn’t running, Brown maintains that he was simply wrestling with whether to run because of family considerations. “If your readers or others can’t understand that, then so be it, but my family comes first,” the congressman says. “Paul Hackett is a decent man, he served his country,” he adds, “but no one is entitled to a Senate nomination.”
<snip>
Hackett is not so sure, though. Though Brown says he wouldn’t be giving up a safe congressional seat unless he knew he could beat DeWine, the veteran counters, “To me, a race between two professional politicians is a no-brainer win for DeWine. You’re not gonna throw out a sitting senator in a Republican state with a very liberal Democratic longstanding US congressman.” If Democrats want to start winning races, he adds, they might need a dose of boot-camp discipline: “How come this doesn’t happen in the Republican Party? It’s because they sit down guys like Sherrod and put him in a corner and make him wear the dunce cap.”