Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"you would have thought someone took away their pacifiers."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 03:49 PM
Original message
"you would have thought someone took away their pacifiers."
Edited on Fri Nov-04-05 03:50 PM by rodeodance
te he.

I got this and had a good laugh (for the most part)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Democrats Standing Firm Against Treason
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:36:04 -0800
From: Congressman John Conyers <john.conyers@johnconyers.com>
Reply-To: 1999992949.173156.105@conyersforcongress.com
To: xxxxx



November 4, 2005

Democrats Standing Firm Against Treason


Returning from the Rosa Parks memorial ceremony in Detroit this week, I have been encouraged by the principled stands that many of my Democratic colleagues have taken.

Earlier this week, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid invoked a rarely used parliamentary procedure to demand on the Senate floor that Republicans provide answers to questions about the administration's use of pre-war intelligence. When Senate Republicans were confronted with the need to come clean with the American people and put our nation's security ahead of propping up a sinking administration, you would have thought someone took away their pacifiers.

"Never have I been slapped in the face with such an affront to the leadership of this grand institution." - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist

Sorry Senator Frist, but having to face questions about why we are fighting a war based on flawed intelligence is not an affront, it's your job. It's disappointing that you consider this responsibility such a burden.

This week, joined by my House colleagues Henry Waxman and Maurice Hinchey, I called on Vice President Cheney to testify before Congress. In the 1970s, Cheney served as Deputy Chief of Staff to President Gerald Ford who agreed to appear before Congress to explain his reasons for pardoning President Nixon. While I am not expecting a speedy answer from the Vice President, I believe the country deserves to hear his reasons for outing a covert agent and undermining our intelligence community. .

I would be remiss if I did not highlight a principled Republican standing up to speak the truth. Former Chief of Staff to Colin Powell, Larry Wilkerson, attracted a lot of attention when he chose to speak publicly about a cabal led by Cheney and Rumsfeld co-opting our national security policy for their own purposes. What was perhaps most illuminating was Wilkerson's interview on NPR's Morning Edition yesterday when he explained that Cheney himself directed the policy of detainee abuse in Abu Ghraib. How was Wilkerson so sure? Because Cheney asked him to collect all the documents and records of communications within the administration on this issue. I wonder where those documents are now?

The DCCC has also been engaged in some creative work following the Libby indictments. They have produced a short video that includes clips of many of the promises Republicans made to get to the bottom of the Valerie Plame leak. This piece includes the Bush Sr. declaration that the lowest form of treason is revealing a spy, the current president’s promises to fire anyone involved in the leak, and former RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie affirming that this was worse than Watergate.

I will be posting this email on my blog, http://conyersblog.us and would encourage any of you to come to this site and post any comments you may have. I will be checking in periodically throughout the weekend to respond to postings.

Thank you for your help and your continued stand for a better democracy.
Sincerely,
http://www.conyersforcongress.com/mail/util.cfm?mailaction=clickthru&gpiv=1999992949.173156.105&gen=1&mailing_linkid=2029
John Conyers, Jr.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. God bless you, John Conyers!! That's great. Frist and the reThugs are a
big bunch of crybabies when anyone DARES to question them or their motives or their agenda.
Boo fuckin' hoo.
Have a hanky, Biwwy Boy...wipe your wittow nose and DO YOUR FUCKING JOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have found
that when my Repub co-workers or family bring up the "dirty trick" of closing the Senate doors (their words not mine!) remind me them of the number of times that the Repubs closed the Senate doors to discuss Clinton's penis! I believe it was SIX! Remind them this is was to get information on why we are killing American, and foreign troops, and Iraqi civlians. This usually shuts them up. I get the feeling that my Repub family are really dreading the holidays with me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. John Conyers is my hero
and also a gentleman. He mentions Republicans who are speaking out, and simply reminding crybaby Frist that he needs to quit whining and do his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Conyers is awesome

bump...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. You'd think an indictment would raise some eyebrows
But the Republicans seem about as curious about this as a pro wrestling referee. You'd almost think they weren't interested in the result of an investigation.

Almost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rep. Conyers continues to hammer the cons over their heads with the truth
Rep.Conyers:

"Sorry Senator Frist, but having to face questions about why we are fighting a war based on flawed intelligence is not an affront, it's your job. It's disappointing that you consider this responsibility such a burden."


:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC