Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you know that Bush and Cheney took drug tests when they took office?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:44 AM
Original message
Did you know that Bush and Cheney took drug tests when they took office?
So did everyone on the WH staff supposedly. Even better, according to Ari Fleischer everyone on staff would be subject to drug tests afterwards. Well, in that case I think it's time for another round of drug tests at the WH. Don't you? And while we're at it, maybe we could file a FOIA request for the results from the first round of testing?


May 10, 2001

ARI FLEISCHER: As part of the policy of working at the White House, all employees must be drug-tested, if you're going to work in the Executive Office of the President. And that means some 650 people were drug-tested upon a condition of employment. Since then, 127 White House employees have been randomly drug-tested. And its an ongoing random drug-testing program that this White House will continue to operate.

And I'm not going to get into anybody did or did not pass. That's going to be treated as a private personnel matter. I would suggest to you that in its entirety, this White House is a very professional operation, and there are no problems that have been brought to anybody's attention. Let me say that.

In the event that something -- somebody were to be tested positive, the White House policy is to treat this on an individual, case-by-case matter, to sit down and talk with the person whose test may have come back positive, to work with them to determine whether it was some type of casual usage or if there is a more serious problem, to determine what drugs were involved, and to work with that person and to help that person seek treatment and counseling. And if the situation is not resolved, the consequences could be anywhere from a letter of reprimand to firing.

Q. Were there 650 drug tests to begin with and now you're doing random follow-ups --

MR. FLEISCHER: That's correct.


Q. -- of another 127?

MR. FLEISCHER: No, that would include people who had previously been tested.

Q. Yes, okay.

MR. FLEISCHER: Correct. It's an ongoing random drug-testing program at the White House.

Q. Everybody was tested to begin with?

MR. FLEISCHER: That's correct.

Q. And then random tests continue?

MR. FLEISCHER: That's exactly correct.

Q. And that includes senior staff, that 650?

MR. FLEISCHER: That's correct.

Q. And just to follow up, again, when you said there have been no --

MR. FLEISCHER: It also includes the President and the Vice President.

Q. They were tested?

MR. FLEISCHER: They were tested as a condition of employment here. They were the first two to take the drug test.

Q. Who imposed the condition of employment, if it wasn't the President?

MR. FLEISCHER: The people.

Q. Oh, come on.

MR. FLEISCHER: No, it's true. The policy of the White House is all employees have to be drug-tested. And that policy extends to the President and the Vice President.

Q. Some people might not have voted for him if they had known that. (Laughter.)

Q. When did they take the test?

Q. Is that the first time --

MR. FLEISCHER: The first week in the White House.



Q. Ari, do you know, to your knowledge, have other Presidents been drug-tested?

MR. FLEISCHER: I don't know.

Q. What if he would have failed, what would have happened, do you know? (Laughter.)

Q. Ari, when you said that no problem has been brought to anybody's attention, are you suggesting that nobody failed the test?

MR. FLEISCHER: I'm suggesting from this podium -- I'm not going to get into counts and numbers on something that may involve counseling of employees. But the fact of the matter is that there are no problems.



Well, gee wiz. Surprise, surprise. Out of 650+ tests there were no problems. Well, golly, then I would assume they would be happy to get tested again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Personally, I'd love to see the 'real' results of dimson's
last physical; I'd really like to see what wasn't shared with the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't know about Cheney, but I remember Junior REFUSED to
Answer ANY questions about had he taken ANY drugs during the last ten years...this was during the Repuke Primaries. I think that all of the other candidates running did answer that particular question.

Whatever Ari said there, is bullshit. Does anyone think that 'Ole Coke Jaw could PASS a drug test?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ari never said anyone passed or failed?
Just that there weren't any 'problems'.

If you think it's okay for the President to be stoned out of his gourd on whatever it is he takes, legal or illegal, then of course it's not a problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. There weren't any "problems"
Okay Ari! 'Ole Coke Jaw, he's not got any "problems"

This makes me feel most comforted...Not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. But if you have a prescription then you can take fist fulls.....
....and it's perfectly legal....smoke a joint and you're a criminal drug addict....sigh....still I don't believe a word out of that freaks mouth. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Okay, totally not-to-topic, but: nice pic there. GodDAMN.
I posted in another thread that I didn't think Bush had changed that much since 2000. The stress of the Presidency naturally wouldn't impact him the way it has other leaders as--I doubt he feels it the same way. But DAAAAMN. You're photo helps show how downtrodden Bush has become under the strain. Yikers.

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I like the picture...


...for the same reasons you do, but also because they're both hanging their heads... and looking to the left. Coincidence? I think not!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You ever notice how that pose is like, Bush's "default" setting?
Seriously. He gets it on whenever the "work" of presidenting gets too hard for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Where there are security clearances, there are drug tests. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC