Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

self-delete

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:24 AM
Original message
self-delete
Edited on Thu Nov-17-05 10:43 AM by DemsUnited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't Fitz say that Libby was the first "known" person to tell
a reporter? I heard and read that last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noisy Democrat Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes
Fitzgerald never said Libby was absolutely the first, just the first known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. This whole point is irrelevent except as a talking point for Republicans.
Whether or not Libby was the first senior white house official to leak to a reporter has zero impact on perjury, false statements and obstruction of justice.

However, in the interest of "just the facts" during his news Fitzgerald said two things:

1. "In fact, Mr. Libby was the first official known to have told a reporter when he talked to Judith Miller in June of 2003 about Valerie Wilson."

2. "At the end of the day what appears is that Mr. Libby's story that he was at the tail end of a chain of phone calls, passing on from one reporter what he heard from another, was not true.

It was false. He was at the beginning of the chain of phone calls, the first official to disclose this information outside the government to a reporter. And then he lied about it afterwards, under oath and repeatedly."

So, technically, Fitzgerald did use the "known" word in the first statement and said Libby "was at the beginning of the chain" NOT that he was the first link in the second.

None of this at all impacts the facts, dates, and evidence laid out in the official indictment papers. Which, by the way, says not a word about Libby being the first or only leaker to the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC