Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT on Viveca Novak: Lawyer Knew That Rove Was a Source, Reporter Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 05:34 PM
Original message
NYT on Viveca Novak: Lawyer Knew That Rove Was a Source, Reporter Says
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 05:36 PM by Bumblebee
Lawyer Knew That Rove Was a Source, Reporter Says


By DAVID JOHNSTON
Published: December 11, 2005

WASHINGTON, Dec. 11 - A lawyer for Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, learned in the first half of 2004 that Mr. Rove had probably been a source for the magazine's July 2003 article that mentioned the C.I.A. officer who has come to be at the heart of the C.I.A. leak case, a Time reporter wrote today.

The Time reporter, Viveca Novak, wrote in a first-person article published on the magazine's Web site that she met with Robert D. Luskin, a lawyer for Mr. Rove, on three occasions in early 2004. She said it was probably during one of these meetings that she raised the possibility that Mr. Rove had discussed the C.I.A. officer with a Time colleague, Matthew Cooper.

Ms. Novak's conversation with Mr. Luskin has been under scrutiny by the special counsel in the leak case, Patrick J. Fitzgerald. In her article, Ms. Novak wrote that the prosecutor sought to question her about the matter after Mr. Luskin told Mr. Fitzgerald of their conversation about Mr. Rove in the belief that the information would help Mr. Rove.

Ms. Novak's testimony appeared to bring Mr. Fitzgerald near to an endpoint in his deliberations about whether to charge Mr. Rove. Mr. Fitzgerald met for the first time with a new grand jury last week, although it is not known what evidence, if any, he presented to the panel.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/politics/11cnd-leak.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=2d72fb4f9f9c0fe5&hp&ex=1134363600&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dont see how this helps Rove. Look at the dates.
Latest date is early May (and it could have been earlier). Rove didnt come clean to Fitz until mid July, right when Cooper's bosses at Time decided for him that he was going to tell all.

What this really shows is that Karl Rove kept information from his lawyer, and then when the lawyer heard about it, he did not immediately act upon this new information, choosing instead to sit and wait to see what Cooper would do.

If I were Fitz, I would think that Luskin and Rove had played me in order to keep Rove from being indicted before the November elections.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000979758

http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,1083899,00.html

V. Novak should have run to her boss immediately to say "I spilled the beans to Luskin---AND ROVE IS KEEPING SECRETS FROM HIS DEFENSE ATTORNEY!!!!!" This last was big news considering how little news was being leaked in the case.


The fact that she didnt, makes me wonder if she is leaving out something---like maybe she is in the habit supplying info to either Luskin or Rove. She never expected them to turn on her and throw her to the wolves in order to buy Rove a little time, so now she is protecting herself---and throwing Rove to the wolves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC