Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh Holy Crap! is the the History Channel in trouble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:31 AM
Original message
Oh Holy Crap! is the the History Channel in trouble
Stupid godless hippies :grr:
http://www.historychannel.com/tdih/tdih.jsp?month=10272964&day=10272990&cat=10272946

This Day In History | General Interest

CHRIST IS BORN?:
December 25, 6 B.C.

Although most Christians celebrate December 25 as the birthday of Jesus Christ, few in the first two Christian centuries claimed any knowledge of the exact day or year in which he was born. The oldest existing record of a Christmas celebration is found in a Roman almanac that tells of a Christ's Nativity festival led by the church of Rome in 336 A.D. The precise reason why Christmas came to be celebrated on December 25 remains obscure, but most researchers believe that Christmas originated as a Christian substitute for pagan celebrations of the winter solstice.

READ MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm still surprised Discovery Channel didn't get lynched for their
documentary on the plausibility of the Noah's Ark story.

That was actually a very cool show. Some very interesting historical and scientific facts to point to where that story actually may have originated from :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. That was a good show - I too was shocked there hasn't been a
boycott on the channel after its airing.

Unfortunately, the nutters easily dismiss facts in defense of their views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Nutters don't care about history
They look to the future - all waiting for the apocalypse.

Why on earth would they watch the History channel? None of that applies to them. Pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. Didn't you know?
They're too busy with the so-called "War on Christmas." It must've gone passed their radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. I wish I saw that
I like stuff like that. I really like anything that makes me think and question and wonder. It doesn't make me a bad Christian to wonder and look at things. It makes me want to know more. My faith in God and Jesus won't waver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. They re-run it occasionally.
Basically, they present Sumarian and Babylonian tablets recounting a flood story that involved not a winemaker (such as the biblical Noah), but a merchant who ferried goods up and down the Euphrates.

They go on to mention that there is no universal sedimentary deposits as there would have been in the case of a global flood, but there IS a universal sedimentary deposit in the Euphrates River basin. They theorize that perhaps the flood referenced was one that encompassed the "known" world for the most part.

They also present logical theories about the pairs of every species, etc. and present the possibility that rather than the impossibly large vessel necessary to carry two of every living thing on the planet, it referred to the specific animals in the region referenced as being clean or unclean (which were exactly specified in the Bible along with the requiste of one pair or seven pair of each).

Their premise is MUCH more plausible than the fundie biblical account, and is, in fact, a highly believable story of a merchant who most likely had a vessel already in place for ferrying goods and during a period of intense rain (accompanied by snowmelt from the mountains to the north), was fortunate enough to be able to salvage his family and much of his stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh dear
Looks like the ACLU has taken over yet another cable network. Where will it all end??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. No I am pretty sure it is part of the "gay agenda"
ACLU is pretty busy defending Rush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've seen
a few shows from the History Channel/Discovery/National Geographic/A&E that has highlighted the origination of how Christmas came to be celebrated.....I guess a whole crapper full of fundies just don't watch TV - oopps. I meant "good" TV..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Discovery Channel did a show and they calculated that Jesus was
born actually born between February and April...I think it was March some time. I think. I can't remember but it certainly wasn't 12/25. Something about what was said on the fields that were actually being harvested and the position of the stars makes the December timeframe false. Plus they did a thing on the 3 wise men and their journey and the north star doesn't reach that position until after the first of the year. Something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That was what I always understood
that he was probably born in the Spring time.

I saw that show. It was very interesting and very well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I Heard It Was Autumn
Jesus was born around the Hebrew Harvest (& Pilgrimage) festival of Sukkot.

And it wasn't a star at all, it was Venus the Three Kings saw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. They speculated that the "star"
was actually a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in 3 BC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Yup I remember hearing something like that too, that it wasn't a star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Isn't that pretty bright too?
Planets are a bit brighter aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Very bright. Jupiter is the third brightest object in the night sky.
after the Moon and Venus.

A conjunction of that nature would have been obvious to any civilzation of the time, and given astrologers a great time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
42. I've seen several shows thinking it was a comet
Astrologers of the time would know all about the apparent positions of the planets.

I can't remember the details but the date has to be between 3-7 B.C. because of something related to Herod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. The show I saw didnt think a comet was likely
because no other civilization recorded one around that time. Particularly the Chinese, who were well advanced in astronomy and astrology by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I read on a thread here once
that the reference to lambs would place it in March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Sheep grazing in the fields
You can't graze when there is frost and/or snow on the ground. Makes it kinda hard dontcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. There's not exactly a lot of snow
In the Middle East, now is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. also, don't they shelter the flocks during the rainy season (winter)?
That's apparently the usual practice in the Middle East -- so the shepherds wouldn't have been out there in the fields all night, in December.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Don't Worry, They've Made Up for It With the Series on the Prophets
I had the station on last night, and they were discussing Biblical prophecy as fulfilled in the history of Israel. *NOT* a historical treatment in any way. I thought better of the History Channel. They should at demonstrate an understanding of the historical method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Of course that makes sense
it would be of Israel. They lived there and everything. I think very very few things are of the whole world but more than likely more so about Israel itself. Both as a people and as a country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. No Surprise
It is no secret that the exact date of Jesus' birth is not known. A date was picked that is symbolic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Okay, explain this for me
Do fundamentalists actually believe December 25th is the absolute exact date of the birth of Christ?

I mean, I'm a lifelong Christian and I never learned it was anything other than a commemorative date, chosen to make use of an existing holiday celebrating a natural event. DO THEY DISPUTE THIS??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I had it explained to me once
Something about how the dinosaurs PROVE that the whole thing is real.

I dunno it made sense at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Fossils are the handiwork of the devil.
Satan created them to divert our faith from God to science.

So not only is Satan evil, he's also got a tool shed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. I think with them
they recognize December 25th as an appointed day to celebrate Jesus' birthday even though there is no proof of anything and majorly everything we do is from the pagan tradition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
38. No telling what they believe.
And with the right spin from the fundies, they will believe something different tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Every Christian I know, including a few Fundamentalists, are quite..
aware that the date December 25th doesn't have any true bearing in fact. It's not a big deal to them. Only to some of us apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Come on we all know the reason we have Christmas...........
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 12:10 PM by Historic NY
is so people can stay at the Holiday Inn, instead of a manager in a barn. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. HA HA HA AHA HA HA HA HA AH AH FAIRY TALES
FAIRY TALES, we told you so....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Why do you hate America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. According to Mangers Birth Records...Jesus was born on Feb 30
to a couple known for not being married. Stoning for having sex outside of marriage was the Law in those days.

To save themselves from the Stones, the couple used the "God Made Me Pregnant Card"

And...it worked...Peeeps are so easy to FOOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. LOL
What happened is Joseph and Mary were to be married but Mary got pregnant and it wasn't by Joseph so they had to hide her pregnancy so she wouldn't get stoned and all that because they lived in the old laws (that are in the OT). The reason they had to go to Jerusalem and stay at the inn was because they had to go there for Joseph to do the census. Back than you had to go to your birth home town (so I would have to go back to Charlotte, NC) and be placed in the book(s). The whole town was so full of people who had moved away and come back and all the inn's were full so they had to stay in the barn. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. When the Catholic church sought to destroy the Pagan(naure) religion
they did things such as evil-ize or th Pagan symbols and put Christian holidays on or around pagan holidays to strangle the Pagan days to death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. What a retarded article
1st they state: "The precise reason why Christmas came to be celebrated on December 25 remains obscure", and then proceed to lay it out in precise detail.

CONSTANTINE PUT IT ON THAT DAY. DUH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Not only did Constantine move Christmas to 12/25
In order to coincide with the holy days of both Mithras and Sol Invictus, but at the Council of Nicaea he put the question of Jesus' divinity to a vote. See, up until then various Christian sects were of opposite minds on that issue, some thought Jesus divine, others a mere mortal. Well, they put the whole thing to a vote at the Council of Nicaea, and divinity won out, but it was a very close vote.

This is also the same council where the modern Bible was laid out, which gospels to include, which to exclude. In fact some of the gospels that pre-dated MMLJ, that were more accurate because they were based on first hand accounts were in fact left out of the Bible, while others, that were less accurate, were included.

So much for these things being the work of God:eyes: Mankind and his ways had entirely too much to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. Oh of course
I remember seeing a special once on the History channel about the protestant Bible we know today and tons of books were left out including a book written by Mary of Magdelene. She probably wrote some stuff they didn't like and she is seen as a hero to Christian women and she was close to Jesus. Men always have the final say and we women are put on the back burner and that's just another good case of that happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. There's no date in the Bible
that mentions Jesus' birthdate. It would be there if there was proof or at least updated at churches. My preacher has never talked about any updated version. Most Biblical scholars believe Jesus was born in or around April and I've also heard September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. I've read that Christ was probably born five years sooner than believed
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 01:39 PM by rocknation
But how could he have been born BEFORE the birth of Christ?

:crazy:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. And how so when there is no date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ucmike Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. at some point jesus' birthday became confused with santa's
every year at christmas i tell my weird conservative catholic aunt that and get her going.


later on christmas day one of my brothers will remind her that bill clinton's greatest accomplishment was sending elian gonzalez back to cuba and the hilarity ensues.

our holiday celebrations have come to include her annual wine induced tirade about "the christ child" elian and the evil that is castro....memories to last a lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
41. Interesting take.
I have read many different aspects from history that can back this theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. According to the Bible, Christ's birthday is sometime in October.
The historical events recorded in the Bible texts when matched with other historical records of events place the date in October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. NO...not the 31ST.?? ........Oh the Horrors....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. .
:rofl:

Got me, that one did!

I must not eat while reading, mama always said ... you proved her right!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC