:hide:
From this Sundays Roanoke Times
http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke/wb/50382Recanted testimony often seen as suspectSome states more readily overturn convictions if testimony changes. Virginia does not.
By Laurence Hammack
..cut..
When a young girl recanted her testimony against Aleck J. Carpitcher, saying he did not molest her in 1998, it took nearly six years for the justice system to respond.
The result: Carpitcher is still in prison.
..cut..
But in Virginia, the Supreme Court has noted that "the opportunity for fraud and temptation are so obvious that courts look with suspicion" on recantations -- language that was cited in last week's decision to deny Carpitcher a new trial.
..cut..
For four years, Carpitcher was barred from making an innocence claim by Virginia's
21-day rule,For Carpitcher to win a new trial, he had to show that his newly discovered evidence -- the recantation -- was material, or that it would have affected the outcome of his trial. By failing to prove that the girl's trial testimony was false, the court ruled, he failed to meet the law's high burden for overturning his conviction. which was once the nation's most restrictive time limit for presenting newly discovered evidence.
..cut..
When Aleck Carpitcher's accuser -- who was 11 at the time of his trial and is now 17 -- first recanted
nine months after his trial, no one invited her into the prosecutor's office to listen to her story.
..cut..
A polygraph test appeared to indicate that she was being truthful when she said the crimes she described to a jury never happened. She even wrote a letter to then-Gov. Jim Gilmore, pleading that Carpitcher be set free.
..cut..
Just unbelievable, 9 months after a person goes to jail, the only piece of evidence against trys to tell ppl that she was mad at him for being her mother's new BF and wanted him out of the house and made up the sexual abuse story. But still that is NOT enough in Virginia to free him. It will be interesting to see what Kaine will do with this issue!!!!