|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
BigBearJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:21 PM Original message |
I'm curious -- how many of you would vote for Cindy to replace Feinstein? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverevergivein (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. She has NO chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Let see how this filibuster comes out, if we should win it then with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not me. I've been disappointed with Fienstien but I'm no fan of loose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. I also share you sentiments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. cindy is about conviction...i am sick of feinstein...and she is my senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
43. Great post! I feel the same! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithnotgreed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 03:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
86. well said - hope you get the chance to get her in office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
57. scatter-shot and unfocused? She's working on one issue and speaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 01:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
69. Well, I would not say it that way, but I agree- no Senate run yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
93. Oh please.....we have a moron for president and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. She's a darling for the anti-war crowd, but most folks are moderate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
30. What makes being anti-war anything other than SENSIBLE?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I'm not saying it's anything but sensible, but the devil is in the details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 12:41 AM Response to Reply #33 |
53. Who gives a damn what the party thinks? What do the Iraqis and the troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 09:52 AM Response to Reply #53 |
61. The Party IS the people, the rank-and-file |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 01:51 AM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Really "Comrade".? How Sovietish of you to say that we don't exist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
76. OK, point to me where I say that "we don't exist." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:24 AM Response to Reply #66 |
95. Kudos.......number 2....you go girl/guy!!!n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:22 AM Response to Reply #53 |
94. Kudos to you.....well said.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark5 (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
105. Completely Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. Though I am not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbfam4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. I told Feinstein that I could no longer support her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guidod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
70. I said the same and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. I was thinking about Obama and now your Feinstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tlsmith1963 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. Cindy *Should* Get Into Politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
9. I would if she's the only person running against DiFi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
96. Thanks for my laugh of the night......."Cindy would shake up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:34 PM Original message |
I'm All For What Cindy Has Done But Don't Think She's Anywhere Near Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
32. Well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
37. I totally agree. We owe Cindy a lot, but I don't think I'd vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
56. Exactly. Run for congress first. We need more of them too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
60. And what, exactly, is "Senate Material"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 12:11 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Bravo...and THAT is how the majority of us feel...by and for the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:37 AM Response to Reply #60 |
98. You just described Diane Frankenstein to a tee!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
97. Your post made me laugh......I couldn't help but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crazy Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm not big on gimmick candidates, like Ah-nold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. Cindy is more effective as a potential candidate than as an actual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DianeG5385 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
13. No Never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. Let me think. A pro-war activist vs a pandering sell out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrumpyGreg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. A pro war activist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
15. Of course I would vote for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. Cindy has name recognition which would be needed to beat DiFi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. No way. Wouldn't vote for her and she has no chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaumont58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
18. She has two chances, slim and none. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
19. It's not my choice anymore, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:42 AM Response to Reply #19 |
99. Plenty of progressives....yea where are they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. NO she doesnt seem to be a democrat. would have to know her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. Thank goodness! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. it is unpopular to be a democrat on a democratic board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
22. Love Cindy Sheehan but Feinstein is the most popular politician in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve A Play (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. You must not live here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. I've been her constituent also and while I am not hogwild about her, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve A Play (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:14 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Do you have a link to that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Steve. I've lived in California for 3 of the last 7 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve A Play (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 12:15 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. I read all of the above and then some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 02:51 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. My reading of newspapers and political bulletins covers this point already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:55 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. yep..thats how i feel and everyone i know feels...in s cruz as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #34 |
62. Yeah, that's why a month out from the filing deadline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GRLMGC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 01:13 AM Response to Reply #34 |
116. Not all of California is Santa Cruz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve A Play (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 02:53 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. I could care less about "other counties" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GRLMGC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 03:01 AM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Nobody said you couldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
82. I'm not so sure about the popular part... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:06 AM Response to Reply #82 |
91. But the original poster was asking for responses to Sheehan's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:46 AM Response to Reply #22 |
100. She is popular in the Senate not in her state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 04:33 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. A review of the original post will show that BigBear John was asking in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #104 |
112. I read quite a bit and there is no need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:33 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Paul Hackett ran a strong race against Jean Schmidt but even a piss-poor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
23. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
im10ashus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. That would be a question best suited for the CA forum, yes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I would vote for Ms. Sheehan if.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
im10ashus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
41. But you live in California, which was my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
27. Nope. But I would vote for a serious Democratic contender |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
47. I second that notion, mgdecombe. Well-put and timely, too. -- n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve A Play (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
28. Bye Bye Di Fi! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Now there's a bumper sticker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
31. Curious?------ no. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
36. I'd vote for any anti-war lefty who'd challenge hawkish Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
45. Sheehan over a War Profiteer and Corporate Shill? That's a No Brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
46. I will vote for pretty much any primary challenger to Feinstein. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
48. If I was a California voter, I would vote for Sheehan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
49. NO and no chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sproutster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
50. Cindy makes me nervous. She seems like she can be led and she is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertypirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
52. I would vote for a hampster before I would ever vote for Feinstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
55. yes I definitely think she should run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldenOldie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 09:28 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Cindy Sheehan obtaining her political experience the hard way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
59. YES, CLEAN HOUSE OF THE DINOS AND WAR PROFITEERS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
63. Absolutely not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
64. She must lead us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
67. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
68. Feinstein showed some guts with her Alito vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
71. Let Will Pitt advise her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 03:29 AM Response to Original message |
72. I wouldn't be crazy about either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 03:31 AM Response to Original message |
73. I would if I lived in California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 03:44 AM Response to Original message |
74. Chances ZERO; unqualified; hasnt been in one single action movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:23 AM Response to Reply #74 |
102. But she can Kick Ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 03:58 AM Response to Original message |
75. No way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cantstandbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
77. I would. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meisje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
78. I'd consider a republican before cindy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Throd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
79. No chance at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
80. Cindy means well but she lacks legislative and diplomatic skills. If |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
81. I will vote for cindy in the prmaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
83. I haven't voted for her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
84. Only in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
85. Even Ms. Sheehan say she doesn't have a chcance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpgamerd00d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
87. No way. I dont vote for radicals, even radical Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Billary2008 (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
88. Cindy is better NTIP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
89. Just as an aside, I notice that sometimes (not always) it's women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #89 |
106. Excellent observations... thank you for mentioning it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 04:56 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Another big-picture view, r4p, and damned well said, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
90. In a Heart Beat.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benfea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:12 AM Response to Original message |
92. I would vote for her, even over Feinstein, but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
101. She can start a mass movement, but I'm not sure she can legislate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peter Frank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:25 AM Response to Original message |
103. No Friggin' way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kick_them_hard (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
108. No Brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
109. A moral voice for change v. More of the same capitulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imlost (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
110. I would vote for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
111. Not me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
114. Ooooo, pick me! What is... Zero percent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abex (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
115. i'd vote for a dog over di-fi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
117. I would if I still lived there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC