Insults and invective, from both sides of the partisan divide, have long been part of American debates. That continues unabated. Usually, it's the far right that trashes my opinions, like the person who emailed, "It's too bad your mother didn't abort you." Or the one who wrote, "You are an intelligent person, but I know that being a liberal destroys the ability of a person to think logically."
But, my column on the foolishness of impeaching President Bush brought equally strident howls from the other side of the political spectrum. One correspondent informed me that I am "a DLC Dino." He followed up with the admonition that I should "get used to hostility." There was plenty of profanity in that e-mail. Another told me she was "ashamed of columns like yours - you think by pandering to forgiveness and moving on for the good of the country that sympathetic voters will vote for god-damned cowardly democrats."
Read "Founding Brothers," a superb book about the constitutional convention and the men of remarkably diverse opinions who populated it, for a picture of the anger and venom during those tense debates about our country's governance. But, these men found a way to work out compromises despite their frequent antipathy for one another and their deep divisions over the new government's structure....
... In American politics today, there is the same ire and pandering to special interests that has always been a part of policy debates. Unfortunately, there seems to be a lesser commitment to solving the huge problems of our time than the founders had more than two centuries ago.
Some of those on both sides of difficult issues would prefer that we simply avoid the tumult of debate and adopt their, to them, superior opinions. But, most of us prefer to hear all sides, even if a point of view enrages us, so that we can, in our uniquely American democratic tradition, solve the problems of our era. Better, no doubt, that the level of insults and invective be lower. Better, for sure, that the discussions and decisions be made in full public view. Essential, above all, that political leaders make the difficult commitment to compromise and cooperate so that they can set sound policies for our future.
Let politicians and the many interest groups on all sides of volatile issues make their cases as strongly as possible. If abuse and pandering are part of the process at the beginning, these leaders must recognize when it's time to move on to diplomacy and compromise. Without that, our democracy cannot function.
http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_3915397
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
