Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stop defending the New York Times!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:40 PM
Original message
Stop defending the New York Times!
OK, I heard Randi Rhodes defending the NYT Friday, and Salon has an article by Conason. Both defenders take the stance that the NYT was just revealing information that was already previously available. Indeed, we are hearing from the defenders that the White House itself revealed some of that information.

News Flash. Bush and the GOP aren't attacking the NYT because of outrage over the publication of secrets. They are attacking the NYT for election-year publicity. Therefore, our defending the NYT is counter-productive. Bush and his rubber stamp Republican Congress want the issue kept controversial so they can posture and prevaricate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. To bury the issue the NY Times would have to go out of business.
So long as it functions as a leading daily, the abuse won't end. Well, it won't end for years after the fact either (see: Bill Clinton)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not necessarily defending the New York Times
It's defending the First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We should defend the First Amendment by defending Joe Wilson.
Defending the NYT over and over against the scurrilous treason charges just muddies the water and lets the GOP wax strong on national security. Unformtunately, IMO, no one has yet figured out how to really defend the freedom of speech in a way that doesn't actually hurt it.

We should ask how many White House enemies the president has personally ordered attacked when they were just exercising their rights to free speech. If we are going to defend the freedom of the press, let's ask how the Bush Administration's counterfeit press undermines the real press.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. What newspaper spent more time skewering our last GREAT President
more than any other in the world? And who exposed his affair BEFORE Sludge?

Fuck them, they stopped being on our side when they refused to question Booashe's run up to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The WHORESHINGTON POST is just as guilty of sabotaging Clinton
I detest the SCREW YORK TIMES. As far as I'm concerned, they're getting what they deserve. I first turned on the TImes, when It and the Whoreshington Post and the Lies Angeles Times all ganged up to smear Gary Webb's contra cocaine expose. They drove Webb to his death.

Then they lied about Whitewater. They made up lie after lie about Clinton. Now they coddle Bush every which way. Screw all of the Pre$$titute$!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC