Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have you noticed how haggard the GOP women are looking?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:32 PM
Original message
Have you noticed how haggard the GOP women are looking?
Saw Kelly Ann yesterday and Coultergeist tonight.

The saying "death warmed over" is kind to them. Their little world came tumbling down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who's Kelly Ann?
Coultergeist has looked bad for some time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Some dingy GOP blonde strategist that popped up in 2000
She's a regular on Faux and MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Kelly Ann - vicous vulture against Clinton all through the 90's -
maneuvered a seat in front of the GE Murdoch Time-Warner cameras every couple of nights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Kellyanne Conway...
Edited on Wed Oct-04-06 09:41 PM by progdonkey
another Coulter wannabe, though she'll never measure up, since she's not as intelligent (yeah, she's that dumb) and doesn't possess that special kind of psychosis that Coulter has.

Edit: fixed name spelling. I also thought it was two words like the OP had it. Short Wiki entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kellyanne_Conway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wesin04 Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing new
Kelly Ann has looked like an anorexic, over made-up woman for a long time now. And Coulter...well. Tucker Carlson thinks she's hot. Meanness will make you ugly. Like my grandmother said, Pretty is as pretty does." These woman don't do pretty things or have pretty thoughts. It's showing!}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. I haven't noticed that, but
I have noticed how many liberals comment on women's looks, consistently. It wasn't something I expected when I joined DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Is looking tired, an insult?
Say, again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Didn't see the word "tired" used in this thread
Until this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. does haggard not equal tired? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. because it's only an observation
She had deep dark circles beneath her eyes like the GOP spinning words weren't coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. lwfern.....
You seriously need to go freak republic before bashing DU'ers for their occasional dissing of righties!! :mad: :mad: :mad:

We are complete saints compared to the VILE, DISGUSTING, APPALLING, NAUSEATING, DEPLORABLE, VICIOUS, SICKENING, VULGAR and OBSCENE ---- HIGHLY OBSCENE comments that FR uses to talk about Democratic Underground and Democrats in General.

In fact, they have separate websites where they pull threads from here and paste them in weaselly little blogs so they can take the obscenities even further.

If you seriously believe that DU'ers EVER come even close to the foul-mouth sleazebags over there.. you certainly haven't looked around much!

This place is G-rated compared to them! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I wasn't comparing DUers to Freepers
I was discussing the way that DUers talk about women.

I'm not really interested in a debate about whether it's acceptable for us to bash women as women, so long as we don't do it as much as freepers do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I don't understand your garbled message
Have you ever seen how classless and cruel the freepers are to Hillary? And you suggest we are like that? Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Did I suggest that?
I wasn't the one comparing DU to freepers. I specifically stated I am NOT comparing us to freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. "us" ??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. "us" as in DUers.
I guess I'm not comfortable anymore claiming the title "liberal" as I've been drifting left of that lately, which is why I used that as a third person sort of label, but DUers remain "us," at least for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. No thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. You are "catagorizing DU'ers" in my opinion...
Edited on Wed Oct-04-06 10:44 PM by larissa

Which is just plain wrong.

25,526,166 posts and counting with close to 96,000 people registering here at one time or another since 2001 and "DU dissing women" threads are what stands out in your mind?

Wow.

(edit- that wasn't meant for you Erika! .. although you probably figured that out)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. I am categorizing, yes
Edited on Wed Oct-04-06 10:57 PM by lwfern
If we had a similar level of discourse about blacks, it would stand out as a key trend to me. Even if the MAJORITY of posts didn't do it, if it was clearly tolerated here, I would have the same awareness of it as an issue.

I felt the same way about some of the immigration threads, when some here were veering dangerously toward nationalism, and a "let 'em starve, it ain't my problem" attitude.

It's one of those things ... it doesn't take much racism, sexism, etc. to be "noticeable" as a culture.

Edit to add: I'm not sure that the majority of DUers felt that way on the immigration issue, but it was noticeable as a relatively mainstream viewpoint here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. What does your rant have to do with GOP women looking haggard?
Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
37. From what I've seen
DUers are generally equal opportunity insulters. For example check out the many references to Jabba the Hut in the last few days. As the saying goes "ugly goes clear to the bone" and GrOPers generally are pretty ugly, inside if not out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. LOL!
You think we Liberals are so bad.......have you ever read the FReeptards comments? Their favorite is Hillary and the "lesbian" tag. It's funny how you are so quick to make a comment about US. I thought we were on the same side. Apparently I was wrong. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. it's because....
....not all hags have the same amount of hagitude....the right-wing hags display a greater degree of rightish hagocity than the left-wing hags could ever do on our side....(although I have seen many a-political hags often demonstrate ferocious hagativity far beyond what you might expect)....

....take my hag for example, she's quite a-political but has tremendous hagitude, although I must admit, in a hagalicious sort of way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. But all hags have the same look
Coultergeist and Kelly Ann are proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChipsAhoy Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
36. You're right - this "appearance" crap is off base.
I think we have enough to complain about without going there. It defeats our real argument and only makes us look like we don't have any REAL issues to discuss. Hell, there are rough looking women on both sides of the aisle.

Let's talk about politics and not second grade name-calling. (sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Kellyanne scrapbook ...... ugly is as ugly does ......
Kelly and her dog and the guy she's married to, in the Vienna, VA home.



Larry Kudlow, Paul Dilion, Kellyanne Conway, Sean Hannity



Ramesh Squeakyvoice, Mr. Kellyanne, and Kellyanne



And in her native element



In her earlier days as Kellyanne Fitzpatrick

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Mr. Kellyanne is one of the Elves of Starr Report fame
Yes, she married one of the infamous elves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I didn't know that .......
..... how incestuously interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. George Conway, a NYC lawyer
He was the lead "elf" and therefore a traitor. David Brock talks about him here:

http://www.buzzflash.com/interviews/2002/05/29_David_Brock.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. ragged
and heavily made up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Defending the indefensible
is tiring work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Kelly Ann looked OLD
I couldn't believe how awful she looked. It's like she's aged 20 years since I saw her last. I think the GOP scandals is more than she can take.She is one of the biggest Clinton haters and bashers around.Karma. I love it. :bounce: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Yes, it appears their own party is producing the bad karma
thrown at themselves.

After the histrionics with Clinton, they deserve every bit of it. It's satisfying they are doing it to themselves. Maybe some kind of catharsis for their outright meanness to Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. Saw that Bulldog looking Crowley on CNN( Larry King) with JC Watt
and she was almost pale, she was in total shock and could add little or nothing to the conversation.

James Carville carried the show.

Usually she can't shut her month but she was close to tears about FOLEY~ :ROFL:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChipsAhoy Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh please!
If I may copy and paste my reply to the "fat" thread ........




They would say the same about Ted Kennedy!

Really now, we have ISSUES on our side. We don't need to lower ourselves to discussing weight. It reminds me that every time I hear a Pub mention Ted Kennedy's weight it makes me laugh because they cannot discuss issues - but try to insult physical appearance.

It's a sign of defeat. Let's not do it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
35. You say they look (Hag)ard?
What else is new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
38. Evil will rot you
from the inside out. Repukes are proof of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC