|
Edited on Sat Oct-28-06 03:56 AM by Tom Rinaldo
When it reaches the point where the Vice President of the United States of America has to issue a public statement denying that he supports the use of torture, and then the President of the United States deems it necessary to underscore that denial with another denial of his own, the damage to America's standing in the world has taken hold. It really is that basic, and Karl Rove would be the first to admit it, if it weren't for the fact that Karl Rove never admits anything. Want to destroy an individual's reputation? It's not so hard. Rove does it all the time as a matter of fact. First come up with the nastiest, ugliest, most twisted rumor about someone, or tidbit of information twisted way out of context, you can possibly imagine. Then make sure to get some media outlet cover it, and then another, until it builds into a big enough distraction or problem that your target has to deny it in public:
"The vicious rumor that is now circulating, claiming that I had sexual relations with the Grandfather Clock in my Congressional Office, is an utter and complete fabrication, and below my dignity to comment on further, other than to point out that I don't even HAVE a Grandfather Clock in my Congressional Office", he said in a statement released today. Heh, heh, Gotcha.
Excuse us Mister Congressman, but the relevant question is DID you have a Grandfather Clock in your office at the time that this incident is alleged to have occurred, not do you have one there currently. Why was your answer so evasive in regards to the timing involved? Do you deny also that you had ANY clock in your Congressional Office during the period in question? Maybe one smaller than, and perhaps not as old as a Grandfather Clock? We are sorry to be so insistent Sir, but can you explain how such a serious allegation against you would come to light if there was nothing whatsoever regarding your personal behavior that could have raised suspicions along these lines? As you know, it is uncommon for a Congressman to be accused of engaging in sex with a Grandfather Clock, Sir. We will extend you the courtesy to explain your actions in this controversy tonight, on Larry King Live. We can fit you in right before the panel of distinguished experts who will join Larry for a lively and illuminating discussion on the fetish of timepiece erotica.
It works pretty much the same with a nation's reputation you know. There are certain accusations that one would rather not rise to the level of a Presidential denial. Until recently, until George W. Bush's Administration as a matter of fact, it was uncommon for the United States to be accused of condoning the torture on prisoners. How quickly we forget when it was US accusing the other guys of using torture, and THEM denying it. Guys like Saddam Hussein to be specific. So now we have both our Vice President and President officially reassuring the world that there is no truth to the allegations that they support the use of torture as a tool for interrogation. We might sometimes let a prisoner bob for apples, but use torture? Nope, absolutely not.
How do we expect the world to react to repeated denials by our President, Vice President, and Secretary of State, all their seemingly weekly proclamations that America doesn't use torture? What are the odds it will be like this:
"That's just great Mr. President, Mr. Vice President, Madam Secretary. Thanks for clearing this Water Boarding thingie up so emphatically for all of us, because to the rest of the world out here, given those photos and stuff we saw of Americans torturing prisoners inside Iraq, and all those reports we heard about secret CIA detention centers, you had us a little worried there for a while. Can you imagine that we actually started believing America might torture people who you seize and detain? The United States of America? How silly of us. However now that you corrected our mistaken reaction to Vice President Cheney's "No Brainer" comment about using torture to save American lives, we promise not to even think about WATER BOARDING again. It's almost like we never even heard of WATER BOARDING. Consider WATER BOARDING forgotten. If any of our recently radicalized anti-American friends, neighbors, co-workers, religious and/or political leaders and/or loved ones bring up WATER BOARDING to explain how America tortures prisoners, we will explain that WATER BOARDING is un American. No doubt Americans can use water in creative ways, but we know WATER BOARDING is not one of them. Though a few more excitable people may still believe America uses WATER BOARDING to torture prisoners, hopefully they will hear your soothing clarification in time to cancel getting fitted for their suicide belts".
I suspect the actual world reaction to the Bush Administration's "how many torturers can dance on the head of a pin?" neocon theology is a tad less trusting than the one I hallucinated above. Though I have long known that the National Republican Party is incredibly adept at the art of Character Assassination, I admit to still being startled to see them so ruthlessly now assassinate the long standing character and international reputation of the nation whose government they so totally control; America, the country they supposedly "love" and want us to leave for them. I'm surprised because typically Republicans restrict their character assassination to out of favor foreign heads of State and people who they view as threats to their own domestic hold on power.
To quasi quote the G.O.P's hallowed Great Communicator; "There they go again". This time it's against James Webb, a distinguished Viet Nam War Hero who actually served with honor in Ronald Reagan's own Administration as Secretary of the Navy. No matter, James Webb is a G.O.P. enemy now, so the order went out to assassinate him. They thought they could give Webb enough words to hang himself. Six novels they figured ought to be enough. So what if the leading contender to head the Republican's 2008 effort to retain power, John McCain, is on record praising James Webb's fictional writing? This is about the 2006 Mid Term Elections. This is about keeping power now. Neither does it matter the acclaim James Webb has gotten for capturing hard truth with equally hard prose in his fictionalized accounts of War; a War in fact that Jim Webb personally saw and George Allen personally avoided. And now James Webb is looking at another war, a war which he sees devastating two nations in Iraq, their nation and our own, while George Allen sees the need to stay his cheerleading course.
So it comes to this again, Republicans twisting Webb's words on War into cut and paste pornography, forgetting that War itself is the real pornography. It is a war today, a malignant war left unattended by those who set it's course, that literally destroys the lives of America's Son's and Daughters. James Webb's words, his often stark depiction of a prior war and the chaos and degradation it rained down on those unfortunate enough to be caught in it's fury, those words destroy no one. Rather they wisely warn us of the true depravity that is War. Here is some of what critics said about James Webb's novel; "Fields of Fire":
Newsweek "In swift flexible prose that does everything he asks of it....Webb gives us an extraordinary range of acutely observed people, not one a stereotype, and as many different ways of looking at that miserable war. . .Fields of Fire is a stunner. "
Time "Webb's book has the unmistakable sound of truth acquired the hard way...."
James Webb used fiction to convey a deeper truth, now George Allen wants to obscure that truth by abusing that fiction. The pen may be mightier than the sword, but a poison pen tells a mighty lie. Who in Virginia can trust George Allen now as he tries to pen Webb as a pornographer? Who in the world can trust George Bush now as he tries to claim America won't torture? Virginia, our Nation, and yes the world, have seen enough Republican lies, distortions, cover ups and hypocrisy to last a life time. And that was just in the last three weeks.
|