|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 11:11 AM Original message |
Inhoff says he'll filibuster any global warming legislation by Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. I hope he does. That will play well in 2008! GOP had head in sand, up ass!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
2. And I hope the Repubs try to filibuster a raise in minimum wage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
3. He's gonna need lots of coffee and tastycakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think that the GOP is going to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlGore-08.com (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
5. So... are there actually enough troglodytes in the Senate to make the filibuster work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 12:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. You only need someone who is willing to talk non-stop until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Not true - that changed a looonnngg long time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Oops! That kind of takes the bite out of the filibuster. I am old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
6. Is Inhoff a member of the Flat Earth Society? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slestak (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good. The gop couldn't find a more ignorant showpiece. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well then shouldn't we simply play the nuclear option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. The nuclear option the 'pukes proposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. True - but I say GIVE THEM WHAT THEY ASKED FOR just the same... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. Let them try and stifle the people's agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gasperc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. I think more than 9 republicans disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
15. If anyone asks you what control of the Senate is reallly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. It's nearly impossible to do it single-handed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Especially for Inhofe -- he doesn't know enough big words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-17-06 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. DO IT! Let's "give" the repukes THEIR "nuclear option"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
21. He'd do it to wrangle some more corporate money from K Street. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdxmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
22. I foresee any filibuster attempt on this particular issue failing almost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
23. The one issue that may get enough Republican support... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
24. That ought to be comical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
25. An Inhofe-related tidbit and it's not encouraging. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I think that's actually encouraging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 01:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Good point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. remember how demonized the democrats were when the filibuster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-18-06 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
29. Makes me wish we had let them "go nuclear" on the judiciary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 03:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC