Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Hillary going to take a DAMN position!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Superman Returns Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:17 PM
Original message
Is Hillary going to take a DAMN position!?
Where has she been? Why is she never putting herself out there on the most defining issue of our times? Does she think she can just not take a position, come out of nowhere and proclaim herself queen? I have utmost respect for Hillary but even as mentioned by Chris Matthews, Where is she? Why are Obama, Edwards, Biden, and Vilsack putting themselves on the line and Hillary still remains, plotting and maneuvering. I'm sick of it. I'm not attacking her for being moderate as others on DU do. I just want to hear her freaking view points. Granted the primaries are still awhile away, but prospective candidates need to take positions as they happen, so the public gets a good variety of voices and opinions. Hell, take a position as an influential NY Senator if your not sure you want to run (though we all know you are). The decision over our Iraq policy, whether to escalate or bring our troops home, is happening now! Please Hillary, stop acting like some political kingpin, waiting for anointment, and put yourself out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why not wait for Bush to make the damn proposal...
Before criticizing people for not commenting on it...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The whole thing has been leaked...
She has been silent....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Leaked by whom?
and for what purposes? Why fall into their trap of lies? Hillary is much smarter than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Come on everyone knows what the guy is gonna do...
Just watch tv for a moment or two...

There are no surprises anymore...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. So?
Satisfying the desires of DU posters for instant gratification is probably not at the top of her list...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I could care less...
I am agreeing with the OP by saying she is always waiting, it seems, until it is safe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. That's what smart politicians do...
whether you agree with it or not, that's politics, always playing it safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. Then why did all the rest of them start opposing the Bush Splurge...
There is a time for playin' it safe and there is a time for showing some kind of leadership...

I don't know...

I have been real up close and personal over the last 30 years with plenty of politicians and I can tell you this, the politicians who play it safe may win an election here and there but when leadership is called for, the people won't flock toward those who play it safe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Over the last 30 yrs...the World has never been in such chaos
as it is today...AND, we didn't have the instant communications like we have today..
We had to wait to read it in the paper the next day...or wait for a tv summary..

Why does Hillary have to run with the pack when she's not part of the pack?
How can Hillary please everyone. How can you please everyone and be the end all to all who depend on you?
As far as I know, she's the only woman considering a presidential bid..
she's cutting her own swath and I respect her for that...she's no dummy.
One misstep and she'll never hear the end of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Just the impression I get that she is far too cautious....
Sometimed the world would rather see someone be bold and project leadership instead of standing back and waiting to construct to exact appropriate response...

That's all I am saying on this...

and it doesn't matter to me which gender or race...

Caution, if allowed to determine everymove, is dispassionate and people lomg tp have a passionate leader....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Yes, I thought the same thing..but
seeing she's married to the best campaigner in the history of the world...
AND.... after we learned last night that Bush didn't wait for Congressional approval
and the surge has already begun..

I don't believe she is doing this on her own. She has to be listening to Bill.
(If she isn't, I'm getting in line for a textual spanking.)
So, now that the surge has begun, she can speak freely and express her true opine,
which she did, after it was publicly announced..

I'm in wait and see mode for now... I have faith she is serious in this endeavor.
And her reasons for doing things the way she has been will soon become evident.

Can you imagine if she came out and vehemently clobbered Bush. She'd suck all the oxygen
out of everyone else's campaign. The press would be all over her like stink on skunk.
She would have run the race in the paddock and blown her self out before the race begins.

Nothing lost here for giving her the benefit of the doubt... and HOPE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. I agree...and what would she have said..
well, now... Bush ordered the deployment of troops to Iraq last Friday.
But don't tell anybody...It's not public knowledge yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Thank YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Not the point
The escalation of this war is not a good idea because it does not solve the real problem which is political. Political problems can only be solved politically. Also, bush's belief that a political problem can be solved with more force is not only wrong, it also will further negate the move toward a real solution which is diplomatic. Thus, this idea is totally wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Ditto. And: has EVERYONE else in Congress made a statement on it?
Or do you think this is just today's We-Hate-Hillary thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superman Returns Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. yeah pretty much everyone has
name one influential player in politics who hasn't, both Democrat and Republican? Don't tell me Senator Clinton isn't influential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. must ... be .... careful ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. hard to balance on the head of a pin - afraid to take a stand because it might offend
Must be all things to all people....

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Today's NY Newsday Article
questioned her on precisely that. Your constituents want to know, Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. If you have the utmost respect for her,
how come you call her "Hillary"? Someone else called attention to this issue on a thread today, and s/he was right.

How come you name Obama, Edwards, Biden, and Vilsack by their last names; but Hillary by her first? Is it too hard to write, "Sen. Clinton"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. because there is no respect.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superman Returns Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. well,
to be honest, you do have a point, and for now on I will caller her Senator Clinton. I guess its because she is a strong, independent woman, and "Hillary" as opposed to "Clinton" makes her transcend her husband's name. Also, calling her just "Clinton" confuses people as to who your talking about. We do the same thing with the Bush father/son duo, emphasing W or J.R. or 43.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, we are studying the taking of
positions, and we are, well, while we are in favor of the taking of positions, insofar as our rights as Americans to take positions is sacred to us all, the actual taking of positions could be construed as giving succor to our enemies both foreign and domestic, which of course I am sworn to uphold.

Is that clear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. She said last week on the Today show she's AGAINST the surge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Uh Huh... and before that she said she was
for the surge, if it led to a withdrawl.

I guess she liked the press that Biden got better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Relax...she will...could you give a chance to HEAR the whole policy strategy ..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Troop SURGE Underway
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Jan. 10, 2007 — President Bush's speech may be scheduled for tonight, but the troop surge in Iraq is already under way.ABC News has learned that the "surge" Bush is expected to announce in a prime time speech tonight has already begun. Ninety advance troops from the 82nd Airborne Division arrived in Baghdad today.

An additional battalion of roughly 800 troops from the same division are expected to arrive in Baghdad Thursday. Eighty percent of the sectarian violence occurs within a 30-mile radius of Baghdad so that is where most of the additional troops will be concentrated.It is the first small wave of troops in a new White House strategy that is expected to put more than 20,000 additional U.S. troops on the ground in Iraq and likely require new call-ups of the National Guard.

The president is expected to deliver his announcement about the increase of troops, a plan that has already been met with stiff criticism from many members of Congress, in a speech tonight from the White House. The arrival of additional forces in Iraq comes a day after leading Democrats said they would back legislation that would block funding to pay for the additional military forces.

A spokeswoman for Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who Tuesday urgently called for Congress to vote on — and reject — the proposed surge, told ABC News that the arrival of additional soldiers "underscores Senator Kennedy's point that Congress must act immediately." Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-N.M., also responded to the report, calling the troops' arrival "deeply disappointing." Reid has said that Americans don't want to see additional forces in Iraq and that he has been considering plans offered by his congressional colleagues.


http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FWNT%2FIraqCoverage%2Fstory%3Fid%3D2785532

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Congress needs to put a leash on Junior tout de suite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. She is a weak, spineless, chickenhawk.
I firmly believe she would have gone to war with Iraq had she been president in 2003. She would have tried to prove she was "strong on terror".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
51. nonsense! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Given how much she supported the war for so long and how long
she has taken to realize the Iraq War was a mistake, I dare say that she would not have made the right call had she been in the presidency at the time. She gives into political pressure very easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. A totally superficial argument..
based in supposition using unrealistic guidelines as the basis for erroneous conclusions.

First of all, she voted for the War as many others did, as a last resort measure, IF
all diplomatic remedies were exhausted, (which they weren't) that is If WMD were found
posing an eminent threat to US security.

One can debate whether either of the conditions of the resolution were met. But to say that
the voters of the resolution voted for war either reflects profound incompetence or intentional
deception.

The resolution was, using Bush's own words, a support for Bush to do the right thing. He didn't.
That should be the response to the absurd charge that they "voted for the war."
It astounds me that they allow this lie to perpetuate and I see this as how Sen Clinton views her vote,
unlike others who have declared they make a mistake. They are not the ones who made a mistake.
The simple fact of the matter is Bush LIED!

The question begs..When Bush found out there were no WMD why hasn't he pulled out of Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
55. 9-11 Does Not = Iraq

Bush & his buddies concocted that. Have you been away this whole time?
To Mars perhaps? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. She hasn't pulled her finger out of the wind yet
In fairness, whe could be waiting for Bush to say something specific before she make specific criticisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I'd Hate To Think where That Finger Has Been
(the images your post evoked do not bear description!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superman Returns Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. sooo
just saw Obama on two cable shows talking eloquently and meaningful. Saw Edwards on Larry King. Where is Senator Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. It Is The Finger Thing!! Maybe She's Been Talking To "Little Joe!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Jesus H Balls, man of steel, have some patience!
Hillary is saving the best for last, that's all. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. and if she comes out against it --- she will still be trashed here
Others are receiving kudos elsewhere on DU but Hillary never has the same luxury. Damned if she does and damed if she doesn't. Why bother with the pretense of a reason to trash her anymore? Seriously.

I find myself defending her here even though I don't support her because of the screaming disparity in the way she is treated, and that really pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. It Was Reported Moments Ago She Did Denounce The Plan, Ma'am
We shall see the result here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Agreed
She's certainly not my fave, but whatever she says will be treated as something desperate.

If she agrees with the escalation (as she indicated recently if there is some plan), then she's declared as a neocon freepazoid. If she disagrees, then she is diabolically swerving to the left to counteract Edwards and/or Obama.

Admittedly, I'm not waiting on pins and needles to hear her opinion...





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. I have this gnawing feeling in a corner of my brain
that she might end up being the nominee after all, not really a stretch considering her power base and the wad she's sitting on, and I don't know if DU is equipped with rack-and-pinion steering powerful enough to effect a 180-degree turn in rhetoric. Damn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Ak..just posted this in another thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #29
45. Exactly
She stirs no warmth in my soul either, but I find myself getting more and more pissed off at these righteous little hypocrites who will praise ANYONE but Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
49. She did - - - and she was
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 08:23 AM by MaineDem
Some people are never satisfied.

I console myself with the fact that DU is not the real world.

Edited for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. She just did...
...MSNBC Breaking..Scarborough. She's against Bush escalation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. I just heard (on MSNBC) she won't support it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Breaking news just announced on MSNBC-
Clinton's office released a statement saying she is opposed to Bush's plan.

Meanwhile Barak Obama is all over the media--not a good move on Clinton's part. I think she'll live to regret her pussyfooting around this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. I think it's a great move...
She's got OBama and Edwards running interference for the cause..
Keeping the "gunfire" media response pointed at Bush.

SMART!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superman Returns Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. breaking news
Scarborough said Senator Clinton released a statement against Bush's plan and escalation. Credit is due. Now, will she be a leader or will she wait in the background?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
38. I just checked her website...she's been busy taking care of business..
January 2007

January 10


Statement of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on House Vote to Increase the Minimum Wage

January 09

Statement of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on 9/11 Commission Recommendations

Statement of Senator Clinton on Today's Reintroduction of Net Neutrality Legislation

Statement of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton Regarding the Department of Homeland Security’s Announcement of FY 2007 Infrastructure Protection Program Grants for New York

January 08

Statement of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton On EPA Decision in Favor of Children’s Health

Senator Clinton Welcomes Announcement of New Funding for New York to Combat Lead Poisoning

Statement of Senator Clinton on the Fifth Anniversary of the No Child Left Behind Act

January 05

Statement of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton Regarding The Department of Homeland Security’s Urban Area Security Initiative Announcement

Senator Clinton Announces Senate Resolution Honoring New York Subway Hero

Senators Clinton, Schumer, Kennedy, Lautenberg And Menendez Re-Introduce Legislation to Address 9/11 Health Effects

January 04

Statement of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on Warrentless Mail Inspection



http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/index.cfm







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. She wanted optimum press coverage, so waited until now
so she could be sure of being part of this news cycle.

Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Why would she have wanted that?
She knows whats going on better than any of the other candidates.

Her husband was the former president ya know. I'm sure she knew
the troops were secretly deployed and had to wait until the announcement came.

The real world is a hell of alot harder than making demands happen on an internet forum.
And playing monday morning qb..

So, lets just wait and see how this all plays out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
48. She said last night that she does NOT SUPPORT the surge
-msnbc said she issued a statement after the speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC