Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Marine Corps Reserves chief defense counsel on Pentagon tribunals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 01:29 PM
Original message
U.S. Marine Corps Reserves chief defense counsel on Pentagon tribunals
Posted on Fri, Jan. 19,

Critics react to Pentagon tribunals

A Miami Herald roundup of verbatim reaction to the Pentagon's new manual for prosecuting suspected terrorists as alleged war criminals at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba:

Snip...

• Colonel Dwight H. Sullivan, U.S. Marine Corps Reserves, Chief Defense Counsel:

``The rules appear carefully crafted to ensure than an accused can be convicted -- and possibly executed -- based on nothing but a coerced confession.

'The rules would allow an accused to be executed based on nothing but hearsay. This is inconsistent with the approach recommended by Senator Lindsey Graham. Senator Graham, a veteran military lawyer, stated that although there may be a need to have additional exceptions to the hearsay rule, it would serve us well as a country to set down and come up with a hearsay rule that has exceptions for the needs of the war on terror, not just ignore the hearsay rule in general.' (statement, Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Aug. 2, 2006)

``The rules provide no protection against unreasonable searches and seizures -- even searches that would intrude into a person's body. Under the Manual, a defendant can have his body cavities forcibly searched, without his consent, and any evidence derived thereof may be admitted against him. A defendant could be subjected to risky surgery in an effort to try to obtain something that the prosecution wants to see, like a piece of shrapnel. A defendant has absolutely no right to object to such conduct under these rules and the authorities don't even need to obtain a search warrant from a judge.

'The rules' broad protections for classified information threaten to swallow everything. These rules are particularly scary coming in the wake of new Guantánamo classification guidelines that make even the prisoners' own name classified as `SECRET.'

more...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC