|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 01:43 PM Original message |
Who Else Has Qualifications Like These?: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wes is the ONLY candidate out there that has the character, values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luckyduck (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Kucinich led the effort against attacking Iraq in the House of Reps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not a litmus test: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lena inRI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Here ya go, Patrice. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Thanks much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Caution is good, Patrice; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. as a balance, also research allegations of war crimes against the general... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xkenx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. All totally disproven, and here you lurk with the same mendacity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Deleted message |
xkenx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Naturally, Serbs and Serb apologists would want to smear Clark; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Serbs and Serb apologists writing on antiwar websites... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xkenx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Yeah, because there are any number of anti-war websites populated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. This ground has been covered by those that love the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Can't tell who your choice is....as it can't be Hillary.......as her hubby was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. her husband isn't running.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Oh...I see, Hillary who sleeps with a war criminal according to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Deleted message |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. So tell us something good about Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. she didn't bomb civilians with cluster bombs.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Listen you...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Senator Clinton had no decision making power... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. The difference with your postings and mine are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 09:43 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. your attacks on real candidates.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 08:40 AM Response to Reply #38 |
47. If you really believed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:09 AM Response to Reply #17 |
46. Are you familiar with Matt Taibbi's previous work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Good for you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. can you post blogs that have a different view of Amnesty International as well? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Thought that was your job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Amnesty International thought he was a war criminal too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. AI never considered Clark a war criminal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
68. Here's what their Executive Director said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #68 |
87. That was from a 2000 press release |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Change has come (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
42. from a reporter that pretended to be a porn star? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
60. You again...with all that shit?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
75. Deleted message |
twilight_sailing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. I sure would like to see Clark as the Dem nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Didn't you know , Credentials do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PegDAC (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. Well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. One thing you left out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
49. Hear! Hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
12. I will K&R that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kaleagal (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. He's learned the painful lessons of war that the others couldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. Welcome to DU, kaleagal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
36. Supporters are a reflection of their candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
37. Anybody with family in the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 10:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I'm a 3-generation "military family", w/ 5 wars.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Catchawave ,how is Edwards standing with the AIPIC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Check this post out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #37 |
53. 6 generation military.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susanna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
43. You won't get an argument from me. I love Wes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
44. Shamless Kick For The General! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
45. Thank You Mods For Not Locking This Thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
48. I do hope Wes Clark runs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeStateDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
50. Al Gore is by far the most qualified to be our next president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. I like Gore, but no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
51. I would like to see a little less glorification of the military in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. research his opinion of the School of the Americas. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. That's not giving me a warm fuzzy feeling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. i feel his opinion of said school... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Ah, got it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Actually, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #61 |
76. And not just Cleland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Not different from the PNAC crowd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. make no mistake... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xkenx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #66 |
85. No, YOU provide the ALLEGED proof, instead of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. I don't see glorification of the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. "Getting shot" isn't an accomplishment in and of itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. It's painfully obvious you didn't bother to read what I wrote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Perhaps you should reread my post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #72 |
78. Then you support no Democratic candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. Perhaps if you limited yourself to discussing Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. asdf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
55. Which qualifications are key? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. So please tell me, as intelligent as all of our folks are, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 07:30 AM Response to Reply #62 |
90. Who didn't have a clue? John Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #55 |
65. Are you being serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 07:39 AM Response to Reply #65 |
91. Yes, I'm perfectly serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
67. Clark on cluster bombs and depleted uranium |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Both approved and funded by Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. "Legal" is questionable at best (and certainly not equal to "moral") |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. They are unquestionably legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. No, they are not "unquestionably legal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. So are you writing your congressman in reference to these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. I believe that what Wes Clark believes is in getting away from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. Try on this paraphrase then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:02 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. I haven't hi-jacked the clark thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Nope, nothing there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
71. If qualifications and character.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
84. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC