Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Learned in '80s: Run VICE from Vice President's office.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 07:25 AM
Original message
Learned in '80s: Run VICE from Vice President's office.
The republicans seem to have learned a lot from the Reagan administration. If you are going to do criminial activity, do it out of the office of the Vice President. That way, the Potus stays in power and can pardon you.

Agnew resigned. His offense was personal, not for the benefit of the president. However, if he had run the watergate plumbers instead of Nixon doing it himself, he may have gotten a pardon. As it was, Nixon was too over his head with Watergate to help his VP.

I wonder what Rockefeller did. He was the last republican invisible VP. We didn't hear much about him.

George HW Bush, former head of the CIA, was able to run Iran/Contra from his VP Office. When congress started asking too many questions, pardons were issued to keep the investigations from proceeding. Reagan claimed not to know anything about it. It worked. We should know a lot more about that operation. Some heads should have rolled. Instead, people who should have been looking out for our national security were undermining it.

Dick Cheney, former secretary of defense, was able to spin intelligence to get us into a war that inriched his friends at Halliburton. He was ultimately responsible for outing a CIA NOC and her cover company Brewster Jennings. Again, people who should have been looking out for our national security were undermining it. Scooter has taken the fall. I expect a pardon for him on a busy news day. The problem facing Scooter et al is the Wilson law suit. I don't think Bush can pardon him from a civil suit. I guess the administration didn't take that possibility into consideration. "No one could have ever anticipated"... that the Wilsons would sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. And when GHW ran for Pres, he then claimed that he was out of the loop.
American people swallowed it hook, line and sinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And when Clinton had the access to documents Bush1 kept secret, he protected Poppy
instead of allowing the truth to be told on ALL the outstanding matters he inherited upon taking office - outstanding matters in IranContra, BCCI, Iraqgate and CIA drugrunning operations.

The Clintons' Real Trouble with Truth

By Robert Parry
February 24, 2007



Hollywood mogul David Geffen touched a raw nerve with Hillary Clinton when he told New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd that “everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling.”

The Clintons’ trouble with truth, however, is not just the petty political lying nor is it their quibbling over what “is is” or what “mistake” means. It’s that they have never shown any real reverence for the truth. Too often, they see it as something to be traded away for a transitory tactical advantage.

If a future historian is ever to understand what happened to the United States in this era – how the world’s greatest power so disastrously lost its way – that scholar should look back to the first Clinton-Bush transition in 1992-93, when Bill Clinton could have grasped a unique historical moment but didn’t.

Clinton was the first U.S. President to take office after the end of the Cold War. He could have ordered a long-needed historical review of what nine U.S. presidents had done, often behind opaque cloaks of government secrecy.

This review also could have assessed what damage those decades of secrecy, propaganda and deception had done to the core values of the American Republic. By revealing the truth, both the good and the bad, Clinton could have helped restore vibrancy to the democratic process by giving the voters the means to again be an informed electorate. ......(more)

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/022307.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC