Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ned Lamont: Two Months (HuffPost)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:26 PM
Original message
Ned Lamont: Two Months (HuffPost)
Ned Lamont

03.19.2007
Two Months (14 comments )

Last week, days before the fourth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, a group of us met with Hans Blix, the former top UN weapons inspector. He reminded us that not only did the UN have hundreds of weapons inspectors on the ground in Iraq before the invasion, but that he had ready access to all of the Iraqi sites which US intel had targeted for inspection. He reminded us that weapons inspectors had already checked out some of the locations which Colin Powell would later refer to in his UN Security Council testimony, and had found no evidence of WMD. And he reminded us that, while weapons inspectors were not yet ready to stipulate whether or not Iraq still had WMD at the time of the invasion, he believed that another two months would have allowed them to make that determination.

Instead of giving the weapons inspectors another two months to better determine whether the rationale for the invasion made sense, President Bush launched the invasion.

Four years, hundreds of billions of dollars, and tens of thousands of dead and wounded later - with the Middle East less stable and America less secure - the invasion and subsequent occupation have proven to be a colossal foreign policy blunder for our country, with no end in sight.

There were better alternatives to a precipitous invasion then, and there are better alternatives to our ongoing occupation now.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ned-lamont/two-months_b_43747.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Never forget that Bush yanked the inspectors out of Iraq
so that he could invade.

I remember this very clearly from just being so stunned when it happened - and that the media wasn't screaming bloody murder about it.

I knew even before then that Bush was awful, but it was then I realized that he planned all along to invade Iraq regardless of anything Congress did, and regardless of any protests.

I really don't have any idea what could have been done to stop him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes, that sinking feeling that this was predestined by bushco.
Yes, the media failed big time in not bringing this issue front and center, (of their newspapers). Hell, the msm pressed and trumpeted the "buildup to the war" with dramatic music, how could they then turn on bush and say Anything negative at that point? Bombs were being dropped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting this.
For more news on Ned, see this article from the HARTFORD COURANT:


"CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- The nation's most prestigious rehab for defeated politicians is found on a short corridor of modest offices outside Harvard Square...."They affectionately refer to it as the school for losers," said Thomas D'Amore, a political consultant and former Kennedy fellow. "Part of the benefits for the fellows is they go there to heal."

"Then there is Ned Lamont.

""His defeat last fall in Connecticut's U.S. Senate race, a contest nationally watched as a referendum on the war in Iraq and the political clout of the anti-war movement, left no apparent wounds for Lamont to nurse during his Kennedy fellowship.

"As part of a broader examination of modern campaigns, Lamont relives his race against Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman every Thursday from 4 to 5:30 p.m. in a conference room crowded with Harvard undergrads and graduate students.

"Lamont, 53, a cable-television entrepreneur who became the darling of the anti-war left by winning a Democratic primary, is also using his time as a Kennedy fellow to chart a new course for staying in public life, though not necessarily elective politics.

"'It's a little tough going back to selling MTV on college campuses after trying to end the war,'" Lamont said last week with a wry smile.

"Call it a midlife exploration.

"Habitually even-keeled, Lamont lacks the angst to qualify for a full-blown midlife crisis. He occupies the same comfortable niche he did during his campaign: a successful and independently wealthy businessman, husband and father of three. His defeat denied him an office, rather than ending a lifelong career."

Lots, lots more http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-lamont0311.artmar11,0,3449337.story

Another nice quote from the article: "I think the critical thing to remember is he only ran for U.S. Senate after other people would not. It was not an ego trip for him."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thanks for info. Such a shame a sleaze bag, Dem/Repub,
was allowed to do his election bid in by playing both sides of the field. I have no doubt Lieberman has lost the respect of the Dems and Repubs.on the Hill. That is my only consolation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I really thought so much of Ned Lamont
for running after no one else would. And if there was any justice in the world..he would have won.

Hope the majority of the Connecticut voters feel like getting even with lieman if he changes to the Fascist Lieman party for real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wise words by Blix!

"There were better alternatives to a precipitous invasion then, and there are better alternatives to our ongoing occupation now."

After watching briefly this a.m. on c-span the protesters "For War" from this weekend, where the mothers of Iraq warriors made statements that those against the war were against the troops and our great leader. Wish I had made notes. They have not been listening, have made up their minds as to what those against the war are saying. Except for those that are against war under any circumstances (religious reasons), all Americans want to have a standing, well cared for military. Their stupidity was overwhelming!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tweety just let Asshole Card get away with that Republican Revision!
"Everyone in the World believed that Saddam had WMD!"--Andrew Card, Hardball, March 19th, 2007

NO!! Not Everyone!

The UN & The MAJORITY of the World though that Saddam MIGHT have WMD, and favored giving the UN Inspectors TIME to find out if he had them!

I HATE hearing that bullshit!
Don't let this revision stand. Correct ANYONE who repeats that LIE!

I'm sending Tweety an E-Mail now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why isn't this being written by Sen. Lamont?
Good man. Hope he runs for another office. He should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah, maybe when lieman runs
in six years again after he's done all he can to royally Screw America..Ned Lamont can come back and WIN this time. Heck, he'll be young enough. He seems like the type who doesn't age..only gracefully!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Maybe sooner
Edited on Mon Mar-19-07 09:31 PM by benny05
For Senator (if Dodd lets it go), Gov, or Chris Shay's seat.

We need Ned in some kind of public leadership.

"Work's gotta pay"--Ned Lamont.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah!
Good guys dont' always win the first time around..they hang in there and never give up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's why I can't let go of my
Edited on Mon Mar-19-07 09:24 PM by zidzi
Ned Lamont Avatar..because he made so much sense and would have made such a great addition to the US Senate and the world would be so much better off with lieman gone to pasture instead of up there on tv whorin' it up with the corporatemediawhores like someone gave a shit what lies are coming out of his weaselly lips.

Keep up the good work, Ned Lamont..we love hearin' from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's why the invasion had to be so soon, "before the summer heat"
Remember that? They were in such a hurry, and gave different reasons for the hurry, but what I remember most is the "summer heat".

Of course, it was before Blix could definitely prove them liars!!

ONce they got their war, it no longer matters.

The $$$$just keeps rolling in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC