Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I thought this debate truly demonstrated our need for Al Gore to run.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:19 PM
Original message
I thought this debate truly demonstrated our need for Al Gore to run.
Not to ruffle anyone's feathers too much, but the best performers keep warmongering and the others don't have a chance in hell.

Just my humble opinion, but we really, very much need Al Gore in this race come Fall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I totally agree. But did love DK and Gravel tonight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. yep.
not that I think they are realistic in the slightest, but I do like their candor and opposition to this idea that attacking "evildoers" is always the best answer.

I must say, I liked Edwards tonight from that point of view... GORE/EDWARDS! (as my friend Wraith says): RECYCLE IN 2008!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingDaevid Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. I'm committed to Kucinich---
---but I also still have the urge to shout, "Come Back, Gene McCarthy! All is Forgiven!" ;-) ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it did just the opposite. We have less than no need for Gore.
We've got at least four people on that stage who would make good presidents, in my opinion. It's an excellent field of candidates. We certainly don't need to recycle Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I am sorry, but Gore is a lot better than the 08 field altogether
Edited on Thu Apr-26-07 08:28 PM by politicasista
(minus Obama or Edwards) He won in 2000. He is the most experienced, if not qualified candiate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree
I think it showed what a rich field we currently have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. a rich field yes, and if I could combine all their individual gifts into one candidate...
oh wait, that's who I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I thought "one will be president with VP and cabinet positions to appoint"
Edited on Thu Apr-26-07 08:32 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
it was a beautiful thing. MKJ

edited to add: and yet, we have miles to go...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. and the four are?
and why do you think they would be better presidential candidates, or presidents than Gore?

Recycle Gore... that's funny! an insipid and wholly inaccurate assessment of what his candidacy would be, but funny from an environmentalist standpoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. I second that!
Gore/Feingold :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. the dream team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. That would be the team to do something on the level of what FDR did when he took office!
which is what this country needs now! A NEW New Deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Al can jump in if he wants to, but as demonstrated tonight, he's got
a gifted field to fend off if he wants the nomination.

I was impressed with our team this evening in South Carolina.

Go, Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Of course, Go team! But all the same....
It's the combination I'm looking for that I don't see among them. Almost in a couple of them perhaps, but almost just isn't the same as the real deal, you know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I looked and saw a stage of presidents.
Gore is in or Gore is out. Clark is in or Clark is out. Hart is in or Hart is out.

If this group is the group from which our next president is chosen, I think we're in good hands and well on our way out of the Bush nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Gary Hart?? And I sure haven't seen
Clark mentioned, anywhere, tonight.
I wonder what he's up to?

And has Hart said one word about running? If so, the media whores never told me that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Those media whores are a tight-lipped bunch sometimes.
I don't think Hart has issued any formal statements one way or the other, but there are two sites of interest:

http://www.garyhartnews.com/hart/

and

http://www.RunGaryHart.com

_______

And you're right -- the MSM isn't the place to go for info. Another DUer passed both these sites on to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes, we have a feast of candidates! I may have issues with one or the
other, but they're sane enough to not be rethugs, and on most issues, I can agree.
I will vote for my undecided favorite in the primaries, but whoever gets it gets my vote.
Lots of drama before then though!

And then there's the rethug candidates. :D

Good evening, Old Crusoe! I didn't watch the whole thing, but am now getting the general gist with the post-debate debate on. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. babylonsister! Howdy. It was a good night for our Democrats down in
South Carolina.

Republican operatives all over the country were tuning in on the sly, and end this evening realizing that we are so totally going to kick their red butts in 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Now you know what Crusoe, you just sold me!
Sometimes us "stuck on one feller" types need a little nod toward the big picture. Thanks. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm for one feller, too, LoH, so I really do understand where you're
coming from. My thought is that for most of my life my first choices don't usually win the nomination.

Mo Udall. Jerry Brown. Gary Hart. Bill Bradley. You get the picture.

At the same time, the Republica Party is so horrifying and unethical -- and moreso by the HOUR -- that my loyalties are going to any of those potential presidents on the stage tonight in South Carolina, or to Gore, Clark, or Hart if any decides to jump in.

For me the hinge is Bush, and the damage his administration has done to the collective well-being. He has never understood that he is not The President, but Our President, and he occupies the people's office and should protect the people's highest aspirations of our constitutional republic.

He has failed miserably at that, and likely doesn't even know what Lincoln and FDR and JFK and others are even talking about.

So if Gore jumps in, he has my heart, mind, and muscle just as he did in 2000, even though my first choice was Bradley.

We're Democrats, and 2008 belongs to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Yes it does.
The Earth is moving and humanity is on the edge... We Democrats are the only ones who can bring this Nation out of the Hell these Republican pieces of shit keep dragging us into time after time, and finally the truth of this vicious cycle is being understood by an even greater majority than ever before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. You got it. And I'm with ya.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. We have a great field. Gore is not running. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. If he doesn't then so be it.
but how exactly am I supposed to "get over" something that hasn't not happened yet? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
23. If Al Gore announced his intention to run, it would change the landscape dramatically.
Overall, I thought Obama, Edwards, and Clinton did pretty well. Hillary got a bit shrill a few times, but came across as Presidential to me. (And I'm not a huge fan of hers.)

Richardson - NO WAY. I didn't catch the whole conversation, but what the heck was the deal with him stating Gonzo should resign because he's Mexican? That should have nothing to do with it. He is not qualified to be Attorney General, he has not lead his department properly, has allowed the Justice Department to become political, and he's either a liar or not in control at all. For those reasons he should resign or be removed from office.

Dodd was OK, but I wasn't impressed with him at all.

The remaining candidates didn't move me one way or the other. I wasn't overly impressed with them, nor was I able to completely write them off.

I will say that the entire lot of them is more impressive than any of the Republicons, I probably won't be able to watch that debate due to my low spin tolerance these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
24. another debate or two like this, and he may jump in
and I'm an Edwards supporter, but we'll see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. That's it exactly...
I'm also an Edwards supporter in my real life, but the general public will not be moved by any particular candidate until they show them something truly statesmanlike (or womanlike), and we haven't really seen that yet from any of the candidates. But watching Al nowadays, he's taking opportunities to show people what a Statesman looks like, and doing it in a very approachable and exciting way. He is already a force to be reckoned with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
26. At least he will be around as an advisor to whoever wins.
And this time, I'll bet, they'll take is advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. No They Won't
If Hillary gets in, I doubt that she'll give much interest to Gore's position, unless they already have some sort of deal worked out, where Gore does not enter the race, in exchange for a position in any future administration.

They won't treat him like the repubs have, but I'm somewhat skeptical that he'll suddenly have all this access and clout. If he wants that, he should become President, and make the rules himself.

I still don't buy the whole argument that he can do more in his position now than as President. That's a bunch of hogwash. As President, with a Democratic controlled Congress, he would wield more authority than he could ever possibly wish for. He would set the agenda. As an outspoken citizen, his stature might be great, but his power will be limited to the extent the President at the time wants it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
27. I want Gore to run as well....
We need someone to stand up to the Corporations and demand they change their environmentally greedy behavior.

As FDR addressed the Robber Barons: "I welcome your hatred." I don't see the top three saying anything close to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
30. And that's the only reason you want him in this?
To make it "interesting" for you? I think he is way past the ego driven money wasting antics of political campaigning. I personally can't stomach it anymore myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC