Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Gonzales Obstruct Justice By Attempting To ‘Shape’ Goodling’s Testimony?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:28 PM
Original message
Did Gonzales Obstruct Justice By Attempting To ‘Shape’ Goodling’s Testimony?
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/23/gonzales-obstruction/

Did Gonzales Obstruct Justice By Attempting To ‘Shape’ Goodling’s Testimony?

In a damaging revelation made late in her testimony today, Monica Goodling disclosed that right before she took a leave of absence from the Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales personally attempted to shape her future testimony to Congress about the U.S. attorney purge.

Describing it as an “uncomfortable” conversation, Goodling claimed that in a personal meeting with Gonzales, he “laid out for me his general recollection…of some of the process…regarding the replacement of the U.S. attorneys.” After he had “laid out a little bit of it,” Gonzales asked Goodling if she “had any reaction to his iteration.” She then added:

I remember thinking at that point that this was something that we were all going to have to talk about, and I didn’t know that it was — I just — I didn’t know that it was maybe appropriate for us to talk about that at that point.

Rep. Arthur Davis (D-AL) asked her if she felt the Attorney General was trying to “shape your recollection,” to which she replied “no.” But Goodling acknowledged she was “uncomfortable” with the conversation. Watch it at link~

Gonzales’ conversation with Goodling took place on either March 14th or 15th, a week after “the House Judiciary Committee requested that Goodling testify before the committee.” Goodling’s testimony indicates that the Attorney General may have crossed “into a borderline area of coaching a likely witness before the eventual testimony.” More importantly, Gonzales’ attempts to coach a witness could potentially be viewed as an obstruction of justice. Here’s 18 USC section 1505:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede…the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress–

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Yet another example of why there is “no confidence” in Alberto Gonzales.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like the only part of the obstruction law applying is "corruptly"
since one can't really call it threats. But one can call it corrupt by its very nature. About as softly and non-threatening as possible, but reeking of corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Layman's point of view here; it sure sounds like it. Definitely goes over the line
of appearance of propriety that is a basic standard for lawyers, as far as I understand. Any new word on the "no confidence" movement in the Congress? I've lost track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've read it's being delayed until after their 2-week break. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. She was right to feel "uncomfortable"
She likely knew what Gonzo was doing, and that it was potentially illegal.

Rarely, if ever, does someone in Gonzo's position sit someone down and say "Look, here's my version of events, and if you're called to testify, that's what I want your story to be." It's usually much more subtle, although Gonzo's asking if she "had any reaction to his iteration" wasn't so subtle. In fact, Goodling herself said that that was when she began feeling uncomfortable about the conversation.

Yeah, I would too.

It'll be interesting to see how the DOJ hits her back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Go to Find Law and Dean's latest
column on Gonzo. Very interesting analysis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Seems as though gonzales obstructs justice just by getting up in the morning.
Or maybe breathing. Or maybe changing his shorts. Blowing his nose. Brushing his teeth.

That's all he's about. To obstruct justice so bush stays protected. He did it in Texas. He's doing it now. That's all he's there for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. "...but he's a very nice man..."
Goodling is not going to make Christmas 07 alive due to her revelations... Gonzo The Torturist has her in his sights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Most definately, by doing such he created a conflict of interest since he himself
is under the gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. The master of 'I don't recall' suddenly remembers something?
Wow. I'm shocked. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC