|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 03:41 PM Original message |
How to take back the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. 4. Add more judges to the court. 5. Have them appointed by a leftist president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah. That's what I meant. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Do one and two. Then offer all the Bushalini appointees the option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jkshaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. This sounds great, if possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. We have NOT had 9 justices since 1788 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jkshaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Is this a joke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. The SC has not consisted of 9 justices during all of its time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAYJDF (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is just unbelievable. SCOTUS overturning a previous ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frogger (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Unbelievable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not going to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
9. I can't understand these rulings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. Not gonna happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-28-07 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
13. or, 3. find the five Dec 12 2000 bush v gore justices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC