Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

911 was an airline security issue, not a terrorist issue.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 10:58 AM
Original message
911 was an airline security issue, not a terrorist issue.
As soon as we define 911 as an airline security issue instead of a terror issue, terror no longer becomes an important issue in the USA. This is because there has not been all that much terror in the USA, Tim Mcveigh and the sniper notwithstanding.

And the airlines were waiting for a security problem before 911. They knew their security was not all that good. The airlines were not waiting for a terror problem.

Why don't we have more high speed trains to deal with the airline security problem?

Terror is like last on my list of worries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Airport security was an easy target for the regime to use to scare America
Planes crashing into buildings and airport security has been such a great fear mongering tool for the bu$h regime. What would they have been able to use that is so visible in the United States to promote the fear and mold the opinions of so many?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. they don't care that much (QRS 11 etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. But the reason we need to look at airport security is, natch, terrorism.
Terrorism is an issue, like it or not. How we deal with terrorists is the issue here. We can either declare war on the rest of the world and treat terrorists like they're some sort of enemy nation (wrong). Or we can treat terrorists like we do any other dangerous organized crime problem, through law enforcement and prevention (right).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. What about that group in CA that killed themselves thinking
They were going to a new life in outer space somewhere? What if a group like that decided to go by taking down some planes? Is not that a worry? They weren't terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. What if space aliens attacked?
What if the rapture happened?


Until nutball cults actually start targeting airports and whatnot, why not deal with reality instead of hypotheticals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. We have had all kinds of nutballs targeting all kinds
of things. McVeigh and his group, the sniper and his band of two. There are plenty of nutballs. Many more nutballs than terrorists. I am also more inclined to group the 911 guys as your typical nutballs rather than your typical terrorists. Those 911 guys were real nut jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Kay. I certainly agree with that.
But it's still a semantic argument. I don't care whether we call them terrorists or nutballs. The point is, just like the snipers or McVeigh, the 9/11 hijackers were criminals. Thugs. They should've been treated as such, and our response should be commensurate. The big mistake was treating al-Qaeda like it was some sort of foreign power to be attacked by our Army. I mean, that's all they could ever ask for, to be treated like a power on the world stage instead of a gang of criminals. Talk about a great recruiting tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. It wasn't even airline security--those guys got expedited visas from Saudi even though they were on
terror watch list.

If we applied the same rules to Saudi we did to other countries, they would have been stopped.

If people in DC acted on info from field agents, they would have been stopped.

If normal hijacking procedures had been followed by the FAA and NORAD, most of the planes would have been stopped.

and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. FAA Norad
But Cheney was in charge of the military excercise that day...........makes you wonder :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. he was heart of operation--literally (he had a USB cable running from his chest)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Cheney
Butt he doesnt have a heart.............:rofl: :rofl: :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. PIC: Cheney DOES have a heart. All his defense connections paid off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. 'those guys' are ALLEDGED killers - no criminal trial has been held.
Edited on Wed Aug-01-07 11:32 AM by higher class
The Cheney administration refused to hold criminal investigations - refused trial by judge and jury - refused all investigation and finally accepted an investigation of our intelligence services ONLY.

WTC bombing #1 - criminal case - convicted attackers in jail

WTC bombing #2 - criminal case - treated like Pearl Harbor - no trial, no jail and UNCONVICTED attackers and their much talked about funders/co-conspirators were not tried and there are reports that some of the 19 are alive and well and living in varions countries in Africa and near Asia. IN FACT - the Cheney administration passed down a ruling that Saudis - rumored to fund and sponsor the ALLEDGED killers - WERE NOT to be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. You were only twice as likely to die in a plane that day as listening to attack on radio driving
but seven times more likely to be injured in a traffic accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Help me help Earth Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good luck with that line of reasoning.
By the way, trains have NO security. I've ridden AMTRAK for free just by virtue of not being noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC