often political enemies alter them.
Case in point: The DLC
At the very top of their entry in wikipedia, we see this:
This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.The very next thing we see is this:
This article does not cite any references or sources.Two things that are common in discussions of the group on places like DU.
Taking a look at the discussion of the DLC's article, we see these gems:
person 1: I added a link to my blog, Democrats Against the DLC. I'd be fine if somebody wanted to get rid of all those blog links, but as long as everyone else is doing it...
person 2: ~~Hi, I got rid of it because it was essentially nothing more than an advertisement.Bobbyd100 02:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
More here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk : Democratic_Leadership_Council (remove spaces before and after the colon)
Seems the entry on wikipedia has been a dumping ground for anti-DLCers. It's really silly that there can be so much disagreement on the actual facts concerning the DLC when their entire body of work is online to be viewed.