Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Nader: Things Are a Lot Worse than We Thought!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:31 AM
Original message
Ralph Nader: Things Are a Lot Worse than We Thought!
In this video, Ralph Nader tells a group about how one congressman explained that part of the reason he won't vote for impeachment is that Bush will, in response, attack Iran, call for Martial law, and cancel the 2008 elections.

As Nader says, If the congressman is right, things are a lot worse, and if he's wrong, he's really paranoid and we don't have a healthy opposition party.


http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_rob_kall_071012_ralph_nader_3a_things_.htm

And we would not have Bush* without you, Nader. You are a deciding factor in how things got that bad, so do not act surprised. And you needed to be more paranoid in 2000 when you were saying there was not a significant difference between the parties. Personally, I think you knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. I just have so little respect for Ralph Nader. He seems to only show up every 4 yrs @election time
Where is he in those non-election years, when there is still vital work to be done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Now now, I'm sure we'd be wanting to impeach Al Gore right now if he'd taken office.
I mean, there's really no difference, right? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I hadn't thought of that. We wouldn't be talking about impeaching anyone right now.
Good call. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. And Bush would be getting a Nobel Peace Prize if he hadn't been elected too
I mean, Gore and Bush are two peas in a pod, just like Ralph told us, right? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. lol
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. That's riiiiight!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ralph Nader is like a four year locust scourge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is why we should all vote for the Democratic nominee.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beberocks Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Exactly! It makes me mad to hear Nader voters complain about *
After all, they helped elect him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. When I was complaining about how Bush* was starting to nominate right-wing justices...
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 10:48 AM by LoZoccolo
...and how Nader and his followers must not have thought that that would be a significant consequence of their 2000 votes, I was hit with "why are you talking about that, that was years ago!" Well duh, a presidential vote has consequences for years to come!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. I was going to say he only pukes out his bullshit every 4 years, but...
Several have beat me to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Dr. Justin Frank, the psychiatrist who wrote "Bush on the Couch" has recently
said the same thing about bush as the congressman. He said bush is so paranoid and crazy that you can't push him into a corner. If you had a rabid giant rat living in your basement that you know would be gone in about 400 days, you might choose to wait it out, rather than setting a rat trap and get bitten. Duh, ralph, that's the lunatic you helped elect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, thanks for the brilliant diagnosis
Thanks for putting the moron in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. I have zero respect for Ralph Nader....
It's inconsequential to me if he points out fact or not anymore. He is the reason Bush sits in the White House today. That's all I need to know. I recall asking Naderites if they were aware that by asking people to vote for Nader they would never elect Nader but they would put Bush in, and one went as far as telling me that he didn't care, that it was a Dem problem, not his.

So Ralph Nader can talk till he's blue in the face, and so can Naderites, and as far as I'm concerned, they're just talking out of a not-very-pleasant part of their body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. If what he says is true, then Pelosi and Congress are allowing
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 11:15 AM by Cleita
the White House bullies to intimidate them with fear. IMPEACH them all right now and if they start more wars, call for martial law and cancel the 2008 election, it's more evidence to impeach them on.

I always suspected Nader of being a right wing operative. He's the one right now trying to make us afraid so we don't impeach them while pretending to be with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. Nader should be hunted down and made to realize what a collosal fuck up he really is
He should be given a mega headache/guilt trip on how he kept Gore from being our rightful Leader....

He and the GOP has fucked our Nation to the point of collapse....

How the Hell can he sleep at night?? Only through the Delusion he and the GOP possess. Fuck him and the pig shit he thrives in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. If this is true what makes you think he will fade quietly on Jan 20th 2009???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Personally, I believe that he hates being president....I think he can't wait
to go but he and cheney are so insane that they might go totally psycho if cornered and bomb away. I don't think it is worth the risk, so if Pelosi and company can keep him calm and with a sliver of his maniacal ego intact, we may get out of this with a shred of our country left. Better than nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. What a damned clown he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. The Pro-Bush and Anti-Nader crowd have one strong character FLAW in common.
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 11:30 AM by ShortnFiery
They love to blame THEIR OWN MISTAKES on someone else ... pound it home and nurture that hate.

How productive and healthy ... how's that working out for you running up to the primaries? :crazy:

Yes, Heaven forbid that you DARE to look inward ... yes, do a little introspection in order to make the LOGICAL conclusion those of us who are not stuck in the "hate Nader" mode arrived at during 2001: Al Gore picked a poor running mate and ran a lack luster campaign.

Just for one moment, could you be willing to set aside ALL THAT HATE, to acknowledge that if The Presidential Election had NOT been close, perhaps Nader would not be the fall-guy because Gore would have won? :shrug:

NOPE, don't do anything productive ... just remain seated on that *pity-potty* and blame it all on that mean ole' Ralph Nader. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. There is little doubt that Nader played a factor.
Nader chose to run most heavily in the states where he thought that he could be a spoiler. Mission accomplished.

It is possible for events to have multiple causes. The 2000 election is one of those events. Ralph Nader was one of the causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Sure, and hyper-focus on that one element until you worked yourselves into
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 11:41 AM by ShortnFiery
a tizzy. :eyes: It's much better than admitting that WE ARE FLAWED That is, Our Gore Campaign / Promotion / Canvassing could have been run much better?

Please at least pause to reconsider all this ruminating over one man as the PRIMARY reason Al Gore is not President today? ... In my not so humble opinion, those who choose to BLAME someone else for their disappointments in life as well as nurture those resentments, tend to vote republican. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. What part of "there are multiple causes" are you having difficulty with?
Repeatedly denying that Ralph Nader was a factor in the '00 election is no less obsessive than asserting that he was the sole cause of the loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. What part of "obsessing on one fall guy" do you not copy?
Gosh, I could do this all day, but I have chores, ya know? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Perhaps you should bother to actually read.
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 11:51 AM by TwilightZone
There were multiple reasons why we lost in '00. Ralph Nader was one of those reasons.

Where in that statement am I "obsessing on one fall guy"?

That would be: nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Perhaps you should READ all the flame-tard responses?
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 11:56 AM by ShortnFiery
This is a big time pity me = hate Nader party. In my decades of addiction counseling ... well you must drive your friends and loved ones nutty with all that spewed hatred toward one guy? :shrug:

Shh! Nope, I'm not suggesting a Dx - NOBODY can in cyberspace. But I'm getting the impression that some of you love to obsess on such hatred and it just "ain't healthy." :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. If you're looking for people on DU that share your Ralph Nader hero worship,
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 11:59 AM by TwilightZone
you're going to be disappointed.

If you spent all those years doing addiction counseling, you should understand what you're doing. It's called projection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Too funny, I was pissed at Nader too, but I resolved that hate within a year - No, I've never voted
for Nader and I never will. But love the hyperbole, it looks raucous on you. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Sure, you were.
If you expect anyone to believe that, you're fishing in the wrong lake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I expect you NOT to believe my comments in the post above, but they are genuine.
Everyone will have to arrive at their own conclusions - as usual. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Another character flaw: Denial
It's apparently easier - or funner - to remain mired in negative emotions than it is to look at the ample evidence of blatant election theft in 00 and 04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. No, I admit that WE, The Democratic Party helped Al Gore run a less than stellar campaign.
You see, I admit my faults. However, people who wish to spend their time blaming others for their own foibles, are by definition, the ones in denial.

Good luck - you're *nurturing that hate* IMO, just like right wing republican :wow: I should know, I live among these beasties ... bravo - you have this HATE gig in common. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Huh? is that in response to me?
Because pointing out the fact that the republican machine, coupled with the supreme court, and the so-called "liberal" media, which is nothing but a megaphone mouthpiece for right-wing corporate interests, did in fact steal the last two general elections doesn't have anything at all to do with "nurturing hate;" abiding that fallacy allows the right to frame the debate as they've successfully done over the past several years, with much cooperation from card carrying Dem's who likewise shout-down any who dare raise the issue - "get over it!" ...and anyone who sticks to the facts is somehow fostering hatred ....uh, no. It only angers those brainwashed by mainline propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. I'm not blaming them on anyone.
My own mistake is that I didn't slam Nader harder in 2000, so I'm fixing that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Oh yes, now you've really hit on the answer I was hoping for ...
:eyes: :crazy: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. we need to learn from mistakes...one of them was allowing Nader to lie about
us. Nader is a brilliant man who knows better but is busy trying to wash the blood off his hands with stubborn repetition of the same old shit. He allowed a lot of people, how many we will never know, to rationalize their votes for self-interest, for an evil man by thinking "they're all the same anyway, at least my taxes will go down".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Excellent Points - Nader was *one cog* in a totally f**ked up 2000 Election.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. Nader was a decisive cog.
He was also a cog that didn't need to be there, and whose premise was a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. And he holds to the crazy idea that...
Our political system be open and diverse to a wide range of views, issues and opinions, instead of continually relying on the two Name Brands which are only viable for extremely wealthy candidates, and are in fact largely two right-wings of the same one corporate party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. No third party candidate has ever won the presidency but several have been
spoilers, ralph among them. So not only is the idea crazy, but evil. Extremism in the defense of "liberty" is a vice, no matter what Goldwater said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. His actions do not reflect that.
Edited on Sun Oct-14-07 12:48 PM by LoZoccolo
If he believed that he'd do something about it. What he is doing does not work toward that goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. That's what I say about Nader.....
He blamed us who are Democrats for not having another political party and set about to punish us by ensuring us a fascist president then pretending he was just running for office. I realize he thinks people are stupid, but he has an over-inflated concept of how stupid he thinks people are. He thinks none of us noticed what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
29. SCREW NADER - don't care what he says except I'm not running
The POS is responcible for the Bush Whitehouse

TRAITOR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
40. So you're saying you think he knew how this would end up?
Where's your tin foil hat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Yup, I think he knew.
I think he wanted this country so fucked up that we would have an all out revolution. I think in his twisted mind, he would be the saviour (okay, I admit that's a little:tinfoilhat:).

I gave him the benefit of the doubt in 2000, but when he ran in 2004, I knew he was a spoiler. He had absolutely no excuse to run in 2004, as he knew Bush had already screwed up things badly, and that he wouldn't have a chance in hell of winning. Our only hope was for a dem to be in the white house, and he tried to screw with that. Bill Maher and Michael Moore both got on their knees and asked him not to run. He was taking money from repubs and trying to get on the ballot in swing states. The dems had to spend considerable time, energy and money trying to fight him, just in case he would make a dent in the election. I don't forgive him for 2004! He doesn't get a second "maybe he didn't know". He knew and still wanted to fuck with us.

What I want to know is, what book is he trying to promote now. He has seriously "jumped the shark" and I wouldn't give him the time of day anymore. And this is from someone who used to hold him in high regard.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. It's actually not as tinfoil as you may think because it has historical precedent.
Stalin encouraged German communists not to form an alliance with liberals during the German election which eventually yielded an Adolph Hitler victory. The mentality there was that Hilter would make things so bad, that people would run to the communists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Exactly. He wanted the country all f*cked up so there'd be a revolution.....
He didn't give a shit if the most helpless among us suffered greatly. He's egotistical as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. When my dad was in college in the early seventies, he saw Nader speak.
He told me that basically he came in thinking that Nader was going to be really cool, and left thinking he was crazy. I can't remember what kinds of things Nader said that made him think that, so I don't know anything about whether or not it had anything to do with fomenting a revolution or something, but that was his impression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I think he knew things would get worse.
Because he knew that there really was a difference between parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. who gives a ROYAL F' what Nader says n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
48. Ruck You, Falph!
Dumb idiot says there's no difference between a Nobel prize winner and an asshole.

Do us a favor Ralph and drive off in a Corvair!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. Anyone NOT thinking Nader won't jump into the 08 elections is really dumb...!
Ralph a bought and paid for spoiler, the GOP even openly contributed to his 04 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
50. Unless he names the congress member who said this, I take it on
faith that he is lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC