Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Hillary fire Bill Shaheen, Co-Chair of her New Hampshire campaign?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:25 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should Hillary fire Bill Shaheen, Co-Chair of her New Hampshire campaign?
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 08:28 PM by hnmnf
As many of you know, Shaheen was the one to sleazily bring up this Obama drug story. She has said she doesnt condone the actions, but should he be fired as well?

I edited this because I put resign in the question and fired in the message. I want it to be fired in both places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. "She doesn't condone the actions?" Sorry, Hill, but if you keep him on your staff,
you're condoning his actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely not
Do you know how much it would hurt Jeanne Shaheen's Senate campaign? Obama is the one who chose to bring up the drug usage. I strongly disagree with using it against him, but it's not like he didn't know of the consequences it could potentially cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So like Bush, she doesn't hold anyone accountable? It doesn't matter how much
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 08:35 PM by jenmito
it could hurt someone else. She has to hold the person accountable, take blame for it herself, or people will rightfully conclude that she did NOT really condemn his actions and/or she was in on it all along. We don't need another Bush admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. The New Hampshire co-chair is Billy Shaheen; why would this hurt Jeanne? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Behind the Spin: What Bill Shaheen really said
Earlier in the day New Hampshire Clinton chair Bill Shaheen told the Washington Post that Republicanswould have a field day asking Obama about his admitted previous drug use.

"It'll be, 'When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?'" Shaheen told the Post. "There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It's hard to overcome."

So, anyone in here want to stick up for the Republicans and say it's not going to happen? Not me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They turned John Kerry, a war hero, into a lying coward who shot people in the back.
They called his decades of principled, nuanced service "flip flopping." If they can't find dirt, they'll make dirt up. If they find dirt, they'll make up filthier dirt.

My only problem with Obama is not that he has flaws in his past, but rather that I'm not sure he'd be able to fight back well enough. However, I think Clinton is starting to teach him a thing or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He believed Bob Novak
when he drummed up an outrageous lie about Hillary Clinton. How inexperienced could you get? Not to mention desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Personally i saw that as a wise move
He basically forced Hillary to do one of two things
1: state she didn't have any such info
2: reveal what info she had

Both would put the story to rest while attacking Novak would leave the question hanging(if not give it more fuel)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. It was Hillary who joined the GOP smear of John Kerry
after a flopped, but somewhat truthful, joke to a college audience. Hillary knew that Kerry had not meant to insult the intelligence of those joining the military, but Kerry was a potential rival then, so Hillary was quite happy to swiftboat him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. YOU'RE the one spinning-just like them...
We KNOW Shaheen SAID that the REPUBS. would have a field day with (insert the negative message here). Duh-you don't see that as a slick way for SHAHEEN to put it out there? And how would the Repubs. have a field day with something that's already out there and has been for years? Not to mention that BUSH was an alcoholic 'til he was 40 AND refused to take a physical allegedly due to cocaine use. No way they'd touch this. But Hillary's camp did. If she condems what Shaheen said, like she claimed, she should fire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bill's a pretty connected guy. I say no.


I knew him as "The Judge"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is unbelievable: Obama's past is not off limits.
Obama's past if fair game in politics.

Obama just brought it up in a speech last week. How is it sleazy?

You guys amaze me. Every nod, every sentence, every move of Clinton is dissected and attacked ad naseum on DU, and yet Obama's admitted violation of criminal laws is off limits?

What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. If it wasnt sleazy, than why did Hillary put out a statement against it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't know. And it bothers me that she did.
It should not be off limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. admitting to having used drugs and seeing it as a mistake is
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 08:50 PM by Bodhi BloodWave
one thing and i would have no problems if they had criticized him for that, but for somebody to indirectly imply that he might have sold drugs to others is a totally different ballpark(specially since he at the same time give ammo to the republican)

I can't recall Obama having ever stated he sold drugs thus he have not brought that up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. There was no indirect implication
I read it. And here is the problem with the whole issue.

In his attempt to keep people from talking about it, it disclosed it in a book. And then suggests that any talk about it is "unwarranted attacks" and "off limits."

But, what do we know about the drug use? How far did it go? Where did it take place? Was it on school grounds? Did he give it or sell it to his friends? These are all questions that come from the original disclosure. Common sense questions that need to be addressed.

Instead of feigning outrage and appearing that he has something to hide, he should just talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. and what do you call having it in a book
and more recently speaking about it in a speech, hiding it?

and what should he say exactly, he has admitted to using it and he has admitted it was wrong of him(as he views it)

what exactly do you want him to say?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well, he brought it up
And if people have questions about it--those questions are fair game. If he does not want to answer--that is his choice, and people can glean from that what they will.

Questions: how often / what / with whom / did he sell it? / did he give it to friends? / how did he get it? / did he do drugs at school? / what was the extent of the use?

Those are legitimate questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Then Shaheen should ask about it up front and not phrase it
as something the republicans will do to him during the General election

Newsflash to Shaheen: you are bringing it up, not the republicans

so my view: Sure bring up those questions, but be up front about it and don't try to hide behind doing it as a favor to Obama since the republicans are sure to do it(atleast one rep running complimented Obama on his honesty, the rest sofar seems to have shrugged their shoulders)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. All Clinton supporters should be imprisoned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudmoddemo Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Either Way It's No Good for Her
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 09:06 PM by proudmoddemo
If she fires him, then it'll look like her campaign is totally incompetent. The Chair of the New Hampshire campaign doesn't just go off to the Washington Post on his own. That was clearly approved by the campaign, which knew about his message and approved it. If she doesn't, then she basically admits to the truth: her campaign not only condoned this, it wrote it. So she either way she has something in common with Bush on this. Not what you want in a Democratic Primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Show him the door
Sheahan gave the media the impression of an undisciplined Clinton campaign. Pundits will question why are there loose cannons with loose lips on the "experienced" campaign?

The drug issue was bound to come up, as it should, but the way it was brought up, with the insinuations of drug dealing, etc, under the guise of "The GOP will make these attacks", plays to Obama's strength. He can respond to this as an attack rather than the valid question of drug use, and the compare and contrast between Honest Obama and Bill Sheahan the dirt flinger in the court of public opinion bolsters his image of "changing the tone".


Firing Sheahan is a band-aid on what is turning into a hemorrhage. Hillary has to make some changes, and Jeanne Sheahan's campaign cannot be HRC's concern. There have been a number of miscalculations on behalf of Hillary's campaigns and it is derailing her message. Reports of animosity between President Clinton and the Sr. Staff, recent instances of rogue operatives sending the Muslim infiltrator email, and now this. I think Hillary needs a change in direction now, if she waits longer the campaign looks like a sinking ship. Bill needs to take over the war room, cause Hill's people are failing her and her message.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bill Shaheen was right on the money
I fear for Barack under the barrage he will experience if he is the nom. I just hope they leave enough of the Senator to stand up to President Huckabee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Then did HRC make a mistake saying that she does not condone his actions in any way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Yes, I think so. In context what he said made sense
Out of context he is wrong.

Quote:

The Republicans are not going to give up without a fight ... and one of the things they're certainly going to jump on is his drug use," said Shaheen, the husband of former N.H. governor Jeanne Shaheen, who is planning to run for the Senate next year. Billy Shaheen contrasted Obama's openness about his past drug use -- which Obama mentioned again at a recent campaign appearance in New Hampshire -- with the approach taken by George W. Bush in 1999 and 2000, when he ruled out questions about his behavior when he was "young and irresponsible."

Shaheen said Obama's candor on the subject would "open the door" to further questions. "It'll be, 'When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?'" Shaheen said. "There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It's hard to overcome."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. So you disagree with Howard Wolfson?
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 09:26 PM by jefferson_dem
...now that the cat is out of the bag and all...

Howard Wolfson, Clinton's communications director, said the campaign has not tried to make use of Obama's past cocaine use and that it would not attempt to do so in the future. "Candidates personal lives should not be a part of this campaign," Wolfson said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/11/as-iowa-nears-clinton-al_n_76235.html?load=1&page=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Nope
"Candidates personal lives should not be a part of this campaign," Wolfson said.

He's right but Shaheen does not believe the Rethugs subscribe to the same values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. So you don't think Shaheen interjected personal lives into the campaign with his comments today?
Ok... That's nonsense.

Here it is again, in case you need a review --

The Republicans are not going to give up without a fight ... and one of the things they're certainly going to jump on is his drug use," said Shaheen, the husband of former N.H. governor Jeanne Shaheen, who is planning to run for the Senate next year. Billy Shaheen contrasted Obama's openness about his past drug use -- which Obama mentioned again at a recent campaign appearance in New Hampshire -- with the approach taken by George W. Bush in 1999 and 2000, when he ruled out questions about his behavior when he was "young and irresponsible."

Shaheen said Obama's candor on the subject would "open the door" to further questions. "It'll be, 'When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?'" Shaheen said. "There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It's hard to overcome."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Yep, I agree with Shaheen
and I'm glad someone is finally speaking to the seriousness of what Obama will face from the rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Don't look now but even Shaheen doesn't agree with Shaheen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Shaheen should not be fired! Let the Hillary campaign crash and burn!
No Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton dynasty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. as long as her guru has her under his spell
she`ll keep losing voters...hillary supporters still won`t admit that penn is the reason she`s failing..well of course that reflects on her judgments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzShellG Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. Ofcourse it is sleazy....
And it goes to show that Senator Obama was correct in believing what Bob Novak said. Apparently, his camp may have heard elsewhere that she was planning/planting dirty tricks. That's one thing that turned me away from Clinton. It's the underhanded way she/her camp operates w/out being acccountable for what they did. This was obviously planned and Novak must have caught wind of it somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. The dirty trick is taking Shaheen out of context
Read the entire quote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. He and Hillary have since apologized
Cuz obviously they did nothing wrong :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. They followed the great rule
It is always easier to apologize than to ask permission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Right after Linda Short and John Matthews n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Who are they?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Hillary's SC State Chairs
Voted to put a gay marriage ban in the SC Constitution, and along with Darrell Jackson, spoke in support of the ban on the floor. By DU standards, homophobes for sure, except interestingly, nobody cares about them at all. So sure, let's fire all the scum from Hillary's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Whoa! This is the second time I've read about
Clinton and her homophobic ties. Yet Obama got beat over the campaign relentlessly for his ties. Very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'd be more impressed if she would take responsibility for her campaign.
She's unwilling to though, which is sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Nah, she should do the Bush-lite thing and keep him on... that'd move NH Dems/indies toward Obama
Edited on Wed Dec-12-07 11:26 PM by ClarkUSA
I love it. Hillary shows her true character at last and boy, is it fucking ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
43. Nope, he only told the truth.
It's not dirt if the candidate himself keeps reminding people of his drug use. He brought it up recently at a school, nobody smeared him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nexus7 Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
44. Has Obama fired his wife yet?
Michelle Obama asked how anyone could manage the country when they couldn't manage their own family, an obvious reference to the Monica affair. Considering Hillary is being asked to fire Shaheen for his relatively harmless and valid question, I supposed everyone asking for this has really strong opinions against Michelle?


Oh, no? Gee now, let's not be hypocritical, OK?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I'd love a link to what Mrs. Obama said; I hadn't read that.
If you can't provide one, pls. let me know where you heard that. Thanks.

And Shaheen isn't relatively harmless when he indicates someone is dealing drugs when he doesn't have a clue and wants to do no more than inspire hatred.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3827011&mesg_id=3827157
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nexus7 Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Our apologies...The item you requested does not exist on this server or cannot be served.
That's what I found at that link. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nexus7 Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. C'mon
Is it really that hard to use Google? I remembered the incident, and did a search, and happened upon that particular link. And you can too! Try terms "michelle obama hillary speech". Trust me, this isn't a secret incident.

But I suspect a lot of people will intentionally play dumb. Whatever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. What are you rambling about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nexus7 Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. I dunno, are you an idiot?
And have you stopped beating your wife?

What kind of nonsense question is that in your subject line?

What is the point of your content-free posting? Are you trying to get to 1000? Do you have a justification for Michelle Obama's comments? Who knows?

Perhaps all you feel in your head is a giant empty rage when something negative is said about Obama, which leaves you speechless (and wordless).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #44
51. What are you rambling about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-12-07 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
46. Did Obama cancel McClurkin? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #46
54. Does one excuse the other?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
49. It was fine that he said the republicans will bring up Obama's drug use
which I don't think they will (Bush used drugs also) but he should have shut up before actually giving examples of the questions the republicans would ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC