He shouldn't run, it's clear that the stolen election in 2000 took too much of a toll on him. I know it's been 8 years but he seems notably worn since then, and he looks a bit portly these days (not that it should matter but in today's environment it does).
He just looks notably different than 2000 when he was more vibrant. Yes, I do understand that he's nearly 10 years older.
I admire and respect his work on global warming and loved An Inconvenient Truth. It's a shame that he wasn't our President as this country would still be truly great and headed the right direction instead of hijacked by right-wing nuts and driven off the cliff. That being said I think Democrats are ready for something new, although most of us really admire and respect Al Gore.
Well...he looked good to me at the Nobel ceremony and besides, portly is better than stupid any day. And stupid is what we have now. It may be too late for Gore but let's hope that we can make our selection for President based on the best candidate and not what the MSM tries to ram down our throats.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.