Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The smear against Obama can be a "teaching moment"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:10 AM
Original message
The smear against Obama can be a "teaching moment"
The smear against Obama regarding his past drug use - i.e., the "did he sell drugs" question - is dangerous territory for anyone who attempts to advance it. The most fertile ground for such a question is a racist assumption. Several other candidates in this race and in the past have either been suspected of or admitted using drugs in their younger days. Not one of them has been accused of being a drug dealer. Even George W. Bush, whose alleged drug past is probably more extensive and sordid than the others, was not assumed to have sold drugs.

In this instance, not only has Obama been brutally honest about his past, there is absolutely no evidence that he was a drug dealer. So why has this issue been raised and why is the press falling all over it? Because he is a black man and it is all too easy for some people to assume that he is more likely to have been a drug dealer than a white person with a similar background.

This assumption is a common one made about our young black men, regardless who they are. Obama is just more prominent than most.

This is a perfect opportunity for Obama and other African Americans to point this out. Yes, we'll be accused of "playing the race card" - we always are whenever we refuse to remain silent on such things. But it is those who are asking the question who are playing the race card by trying to capitalize on the negative steretypes that are consistently used to pigeonhole and, yes, hold back, young black men.

Obama wrote the Foreword to the National Urban League's "State of Black America Report: Portrait of the Black Male." In it, he wrote:

There are at least two stories to tell about the state of black America in 2007. One story celebrates the extraordinary fact that some of this country’s top financial institutions have black chief executives, that a black woman is president of an Ivy League university, that the current and previous secretaries of state are black Americans, that a black coach led his team to victory in the Super Bowl, that the college graduation rate of black women has never been higher, that homeownership by blacks is as high as it has ever been, and that blacks have penetrated nearly every barrier in law, business, medicine, sports, education, politics and public service. Black influence on art and culture is as strong as it has ever been, and black voters should feel empowered by a reauthorized Voting Rights Act. But another story must also be told about the state of black America. A quarter of all black Americans live below the federal poverty level, a poverty rate about twice the national rate. More than a third of all black children live in poverty and almost two-thirds grow up in a home without both parents. In some cities, more than half of all black boys do not finish high school, and by the time they are in their 30s, almost six in ten black high school dropouts will have spent time in prison. Half of all black men in their 20s are jobless, and one study a few years ago found more black men in prison than enrolled in college. The typical black household earns only about 60% of the earnings of white households and has a net worth only about 10% that of whites. The HIV/AIDS rate is highest for black Americans, and blacks are more often the victims of inadequate healthcare and preventable health maladies. This sad story is a stark reminder that the long march toward true and meaningful equality in America isn’t over. We have a long way to go.

The world is changing at lightening speed. Globalization is transforming the game for all Americans, creating more opportunity but also greater vulnerability. At the same time, the black family, as a structure of relationships, love, support and sustenance, is endangered. And government institutions that support working families and ensure economic mobility have been damaged by irresponsible fiscal policies, cynical incompetence, and neglect. Young black males in particular have been left so far behind that their well-being is too often measured not by the richness and meaning of their lives—or their contributions to our economy and common lives—but rather by the costs they impose on others.
. . .
That’s why this annual status report is so important. It is a moment to consider the opportunities that confront America. Will we be able to use the greater financial, educational, political, and cultural assets that we have acquired in order to finish the fight for equality that others have started? Will we be able to coalesce around a commitment to strengthening the black family and reinventing community-based and national programs to support those who have been left behind or need assistance to get ahead? The crisis of the black male is our crisis whether we are black or white, male or female. The failure of our policies to recognize black men as husbands, fathers, sons and role models is being acknowledged, and we need a new ethic of compassion to break the cycle of educational failure, unemployment, absentee fatherhood, incarceration, and recidivism.

History teaches us that equality must be fought for each and every day. We must redouble our efforts to close the health care gap that leaves minority communities with higher rates of disease and lower rates of quality care. We must close the achievement gap by committing to early education and ensuring that we teach all of our kids to take pride in educational achievement. We must close the empathy gap that lets us give up on people who may have lost their way and all Americans must embrace our common fate and shared destiny . . . This is the journey we are on together.
http://www.nul.org/thestateofblackamerica.html

This smear opens the door to some real analysis of these issues and give Obama and others the opportunity to diffuse some of the stereotypes and negative assumptions that people have about blacks in general and black men in particular. There is no doubt that the ONLY reason this attack has been launched against Obama is that he is a black man. No such smear has ever been made against a white candidate - or at least has not been picked up by the mainstream media - regardless of their background or personal history. The people who threw this into the atmosphere expected it to stick because they know that many white people would accept without question the notion that a black man, no matter what his history and accomplishments, may have once been a drug dealer.

But much of the prejudice that leads to these assumptions is based on ignorance, not malice. I believe that there are many good-minded and decent-hearted people who respect Obama, even if they are prone to stereotyping him, who will listen and learn and understand the truth if it's put to them the right way.

This could be a real teaching moment for a large segment of the American public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. So if Hillary has the guts to stand up to all the slings and arrows
from the republicans for the last twenty years and Obama's American Idol group for the last year, how come Obama doesn't have the guts to stand up to this. Is he that weak and ineffective he can't take some slings and arrows like Hillary. Wonder if he would be that weak as a president, put his head in the sand if someone said BOO BOO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. why would obama dignify this attack with a response.
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 10:38 AM by madrchsod
responding to this would mean that he is stooping the the level of his attacker which in the real word is a sign of weakness and immaturity. nice try but obama has been taking slings and arrows for quite some time now and he`s still kept his dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. It will be interesting to see what Obama does here
For the time being, staying above the fray and letting the Clintons twist in the wind a little seems smartest to me. However, once the campaign is past Iowa and New Hampshire, Clinton's smears should and, I think, will be used to consolidate the black vote behind Obama. How does John Lewis, who didn't even want to endorse Hillary, feel now that her campaign is promoting the "black guy as drug dealer" stereotype? I imagine that he and many of the fair-minded black leaders (and that excludes Andrew Young) who sided with Clinton in this fight are asking that question today. Obama doesn't have to stoke those fires; I'm sure they are already burning, especially as he is beginning to lead in the predominantly white states that skeptical blacks didn't think would support him.

The intro that you cite is the beginning of a great speech, and I've heard Obama give it before. Obama's not asking us to "get beyond" race, he's saying governments and individuals need to actuvely fight dehumanization and the hopelessness that it promotes, particularly among black men. What's new is we now have a major Democratic campaign using dehumanizing stereotypes. Obama can allude to that without naming names in the context of the broader teaching moment that you describe and it would/will be extremely powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. One thing Obama has taught me.
If you attack people by claiming you are constantly being attacked by them, people will fall for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yada yada yada..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. What kind of person attacks from the shadows with a whispering campaign?
The Internet is proving invaluable this campaign season for getting factual information out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Oppose Obama and you're a racist."
Got it.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. NO - you don't "got it"
But your response is not surprising. As I noted in my OP, this is a common reaction by some people in these circumstances.

This is not about "opposing" Obama. Nor is about accusing those who oppose him - or even those who are making these accusations - of being racist. This is about a smear campaign against him intended to plant in people's minds that he was a drug dealer - a characterization that is considered appropriate by many because of the racist stereotypes about black men that continue to permeate our society. One need not be racist in order to try to use the racism of others to their advantage.

It is not necessarily racist, but it is, without doubt, racial politics.

The purpose of racial politics is to feed into and exploit people's ignorance, fears, and stereotypes about race, in this case, about black people. Just as was done in 1988 with the Willie Horton ad - ginning up a segment of the white population's overblown fears about violent black men - this smear is clearly intended to feed on some white people's willingness to accept without question the characterization of a black man as a drug dealer.

So, if you think my post was as simple as "you oppose Obama and you're a racist," not only do you not "get it," your overly-simplistic and dismissive reaction shows that you have a long way to go to understand a very complex, but very real, issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. GREATEST OP I've read in a while...really..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm not dismissing the fact that YOU are introducing "race" into the
drug smear issue based solely on your opinion.

Yup, I get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. If you believe that race has nothing to do with this smear
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 01:42 PM by EffieBlack
then you are appallingly naive about politics and clearly know nothing about racial politics.

One of the key tactics in racial politics is to never overtly MENTION race (Atwater never once mentioned Willie Horton's race - they just kept showing his photo and 'nuff said) - all the better to fool people like you, who don't know any better, into buying into it and even defending it by accusing those of us who DO know better of injecting race into the discussion.

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Then call it what you believe it to be : "A racial attack on Obama". No need
to slyly beat around the bush.

BTW, People like me are not fooled by "Willie Horton" who just happened to be mentioned in the context of a Hillary attack on Obama, by people like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. She never claimed it was a "racial attack on Obama"
Effieblack made herself very clear. She said this is classic racial politics, which it is. The fact that you don't seem to understand or recognize it doesn't mean that isn't exactly what's happening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Walks like a duck. If it's "racial politics" then it's a "racial attack".
That much is clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I guess you would believe that
But people with a more sophisticated understanding of racial politics know that it's much more complicated than that.

I'm sure the OP was directed to them since those who see things the way you probably won't benefit from this kind of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. My understanding is sophisticated enough to see through the OP's attempt
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 03:00 PM by oasis
to stir the race kettle by calling her sermon a "learning moment".

You, with your highly "sophisticated understanding of racial politics", have your own take on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. "Question Obama and you're an attacker."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Not just plain old, garden variety "attacker". It's a racial attack doncha know?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Brilliant post, Effie. Thank you. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thank you
I appreciate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Easily recommended....
...thanks for a great post...:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. It looks to me like it's Obama smearing Hillary, not vice versa.
HRC herself never referenced Obama's past drug use and, AFAIK, neither did her oficial 'campaign.' In addition, the person who DID reference said drug use (Shaheen) never said anything I saw about Obama ever SELLING drugs. So where did THAT idea come from?

From the Obama campaign, that's who.

Methinks the fellow doth protest too much.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franc_Lee Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. It appears the Hillary camp is simply getting nervous and desperate with
her numbers dropping weekly across the boards...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC