Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: N.H. Blog Unmasks a Campaign in Comments (Clinton campaign sock-puppets)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:28 PM
Original message
WP: N.H. Blog Unmasks a Campaign in Comments (Clinton campaign sock-puppets)
Edited on Thu Dec-13-07 12:33 PM by Pirate Smile

N.H. Blog Unmasks a Campaign in Comments

Something smelled quite fishy on Blue Hampshire, the influential liberal blog in the Granite State.

And bloggers at Blue Hampshire were able to trace it back to Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign, which has lost ground to Sen. Barack Obama in a recent state poll.

As on other blogs such as Daily Kos, readers of Blue Hampshire -- about 800 a day, a relatively small but consequential group that includes party activists and state Democratic leaders -- recommend "diaries" that visitors should read. Yesterday, four readers who created new accounts and recommended pro-Clinton postings were traced back to Clinton's campaign. And those readers, Blue Hampshire noted, didn't disclose their relationship with Clinton. In the blogosphere, there's a word for this frowned-upon behavior: "sock-puppeting."

Dean Barker, one of Blue Hampshire's editors, wrote last night that the four accounts had been banned from the site. Kathleen Strand, a Clinton staffer, told Barker, he wrote, that "this was not an orchestrated effort but the product of over-eager staffers and volunteers, done without her awareness, and that it will not be repeated."

Already, the political blogosphere is buzzing about it. Josh Levy of TechPresident wrote this morning: "I'm still amazed that anyone with a basic knowledge of computers would think that they operate anonymously from a campaign office. Haven't we learned anything from Wikipedia?"

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/12/13/nh_blog_unmasks_a_campaign_in.html


The Clinton campaign sure has a lot of over-eager campaign staff freelancing all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-13-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. You'd think these campaigns would at least provide a handbook
of what staffers should NOT do. Seems mistakes like this could so easily be avoided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC