Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Edwards and Obama make a policy agreement?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 10:58 AM
Original message
Should Edwards and Obama make a policy agreement?

I don't mean to downplay their differences, which surely exist, but most here agree that Edwards and Obama have more in common than any of them with Hillary. Right now, Obama is the frontrunner, but Edwards is holding his own - and there's the very real chance that the "change" vote is split among both allowing Hillary to retake frontrunner status by super Tuesday. That's not something that either the Obama or the Edwards camps want.

Even though his chances of winning the nomination are slim, I don't think Edwards should simply quit the race - first of all, he clearly represents lots of democrats; second, his message helps shape and energize the democratic primary no matter who ends up being the nominee; third, he has broad appeal and scores high on electability (except for the money issue which I'm not going into).

So what's the best solution for those of us who like both John and Barack? There's already buzz of Edwards being Obama's VP, and others have pointed out that Edwards would be a great AG. While that would be great, I would like the alliance between them to go beyond a specific position - I would like Barack to incorporate some of Edwards' proposals and populist focus into his own campaign.

If Edwards edges Hillary on NH and SC, then there is no question that his campaign should go ahead. If, however, he comes in third in both, I believe he should enter a policy agreement with Obama before super Tuesday to ensure that the best the Democratic party has to offer gets a clear victory in the primaries and carries a progressive message to the GE and the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. How can they? One's a corporatist, the other isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Things are not black or white

While Obama is more a corporatist that I personally would like, he's certainly not as bad in that respect as HRC. Part of the agreement could definitely be about corporativism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. After last night,
Obama and Edwards should get a room. They make a nice pair of tag-teamers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. If he stays in it, he ensures none of his supporters defect to Hillary. And in the convention he
could possibly send them Obama's way in exchange for a position on the ticket or AG. But the race is far from over at this point. If Hillary comes in third by a reasonable margin, it's an Edwards/Obama race down the stretch where either could win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC