|
I don't mean to downplay their differences, which surely exist, but most here agree that Edwards and Obama have more in common than any of them with Hillary. Right now, Obama is the frontrunner, but Edwards is holding his own - and there's the very real chance that the "change" vote is split among both allowing Hillary to retake frontrunner status by super Tuesday. That's not something that either the Obama or the Edwards camps want.
Even though his chances of winning the nomination are slim, I don't think Edwards should simply quit the race - first of all, he clearly represents lots of democrats; second, his message helps shape and energize the democratic primary no matter who ends up being the nominee; third, he has broad appeal and scores high on electability (except for the money issue which I'm not going into).
So what's the best solution for those of us who like both John and Barack? There's already buzz of Edwards being Obama's VP, and others have pointed out that Edwards would be a great AG. While that would be great, I would like the alliance between them to go beyond a specific position - I would like Barack to incorporate some of Edwards' proposals and populist focus into his own campaign.
If Edwards edges Hillary on NH and SC, then there is no question that his campaign should go ahead. If, however, he comes in third in both, I believe he should enter a policy agreement with Obama before super Tuesday to ensure that the best the Democratic party has to offer gets a clear victory in the primaries and carries a progressive message to the GE and the White House.
|