Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What AreThe Current Polls Saying In Florida, Michigan, Nevada, South Carolina?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:43 PM
Original message
What AreThe Current Polls Saying In Florida, Michigan, Nevada, South Carolina?
These are the four left in January, I believe. Anyone have current poll results for the primaries here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Realclearpolitics.com is a pretty good poll aggregator...
on its opening page, it's got polls showing Obama ahead by 7 in SC, and Clinton ahead by 8 in Florida.

It doesn't list new polls for Michigan or Nevada, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What good will the results in FL and MI be? Bragging rights? Does it count for momentum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Is He Not On The Ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Michigan and Florida disobeyed the Democratic Party and elected to have their primaries...
earlier than Feb. 5. Thus, the party has said it will not seat any of those states' delegates at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Florida and Michigan have been stripped of their delegates for leapfrogging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. IIRC, Clinton and Kucinich are the only D's on the ballot in MI
When they broke the rules, the others withdrew.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. MI will have little impact but FL could have an effect on momentum.
The momentum would be in terms of perception going into Sooper-Dooper Tues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. did you see that Hill's lead in Florida is down to 8?
what do you make of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:54 PM
Original message
Her lead in New Hampshire was negitive 10.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 04:57 PM by William769
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. if you have trouble spelling negative, you can always use a -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I sometimes do things out of the ordinary just to miff people.
Apparently it's worked here. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. FL polling is likely to follow the national heats since candidates are not allowed to campaign there
Since nat heats have gotten very close in the wake of Obama's IA victory, I was not surprised to see FL mirror his rise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. There's the old domino effect, though, as far as Michigan goes...
the winner there could have momentum going into Florida, which will, as you said, offer momentum going into Feb. 5. So, in an indirect way, it matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. True but SC is right before FL so I think that should be a bigger factor.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 05:01 PM by rinsd
And since no one is allowed to campaign in FL, it should be interesting.

It would be a referendum on the national campaign with all candidate exposure coming from that lens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Interesting unless, like me, you live in Florida.
x(


But, yeah, I agree that SC will have a larger effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Damn that sucks.
Sorry if I sounded flip about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. No worries.
It's one of those things where you just gotta laugh. Politicians, eh?


I'll still be voting, of course, because like we've been saying, regardless of the delegate count, Florida matters in terms of momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. You have got to be kidding? After the Tuesday poll fiasco? ROFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Throw Florida and Michigan out, Nevada polls havent been updated in a month, and SC shows...
Obama up anywhere from 7-20 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would expect Hillary to take Florida. Her kind of wheeling and dealing
between business and government, among the shaker and movers is very big around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. I will consider all polls useless until the post-NH effect is reflected
in the samples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. None of them worth a bunk for another 3 days really


The dynamics changed last night. I expect a massive swing back to Hilary again. I'd be surprised if Obama's loss last night did not do a lot of damage. The deflation was just withering like a balloon being pricked and it went whizzing off round the room.

After all his national and other primary polls only rose sharply after Iowa. Last night just punctured that very hard.

I don't care what anyone says but the public watched Obama go from a commanding so called 10 to 12 point lead in NH to a 3% defeat, that was just stunning in nature by itself.

NH was a must win for him, the bar was raised and he failed to meet it, its a big problem. Hilary's was just to get close but by winning she litterally picked his momentum up and smashed him round the head with it, she might as well have used a baseball bat on him to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. After New Hampshire? the polls don't mean diddly-squat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Oh, I dunno. I don't think the fact that polls got it wrong in NH erases the fact that...
in previous elections, polls have been right or nearly right a large majority of the time, especially when looked at as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. SC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is a keeper - an interactive summary poll....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC