Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Nation: The Clintons' Iraq Fairy Tale

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:54 PM
Original message
The Nation: The Clintons' Iraq Fairy Tale

THE CLINTONS' IRAQ FAIRY TALE...It's fascinating to see Hillary Clinton attack Barack Obama for things that she herself voted for, like funding for the war in Iraq.

Following her Meet the Press appearance on Sunday, in which she sharply questioned Obama's antiwar credentials, Clinton's National Security Director Lee Feinstein said that "Since 2004, Senator Obama explicitly called for keeping troops in Iraq and opposed a timeline for withdrawal, only changing his position when he became a candidate for the White House." Actually that's what Clinton did, waiting until February 17, 2007--after Obama--to release her own exit strategy. In the years after her vote for the Senate's Iraq resolution, Clinton clung to her support of the war. On a February 23, 2005, Meet the Press appearance, with Senator John McCain, she criticized the idea of a timetable for withdrawal, saying: "We don't want to send a signal to the insurgents, to the terrorists that we are going to be out of here at some, you know, date certain. I think that would be like a green light to go ahead and just bide your time." Her conclusions were hardly different than Senator McCain's.

That's why Clinton's latest attack against Obama should be seen as part of a consistent attempt by the Clintons to rewrite their history on Iraq, from Bill claiming that he had always opposed the war to Richard Holbrooke alleging that Clinton had voted "to empower the President to avoid war."

Since the war debate began, Clinton and her advisers have lagged behind prominent members of the party in opposing the war and then calling for a strategy to get out. As an example, take the pivotal moment after Congressman Jack Murtha issued his dramatic break with the war. .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=270194



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary joined the GOP in attacking Murtha when he said the war was lost
And she did the same against Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for that post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmonicaman Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. As a non american
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 07:03 PM by Harmonicaman
and as the rest of the world has had to put up with the Bush business cabal running this world to the brink of disaster over their extended and extensive profit margins on the backs of dead brown people, and the illegal betrayals of americans constitutional rights, we are wondering what the hell is going on with the democrat wannabe candidates and the whole Us electoral race for next prez.

Sometimes it looks like none of those people actually want to win the thing and are doing their best to queer the pitch for the forthcoming election.

Has Bush screwed everything soooo bad no democrat wants to touch it with a barge pole, and they're doing their best to get the republicans re-elected so that the whole shit storm can fall on those who caused it.

meanwhile the republicans are doing their best to nominate a total buffoon to get out of the way when the whole shitstorm comes down so they can blame the democrats for the lot.

is that about it ?

or have I missed a meeting ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, they are a piece of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Her argument was surreal double talk
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 10:21 AM by HamdenRice
When I watched her on MTP, it was clear that she had decided to just completely obfuscate the issue with double talk and bullshit, because she didn't have a factual leg to stand on.

We've had 7 years of a president completely bullshitting us, insulting our intelligence with lies. Do we need more?

Another reason that I will never vote for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC