Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Is Your Candidate, & WHY? Play Nice!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mrdemocrat78 Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:19 AM
Original message
Who Is Your Candidate, & WHY? Play Nice!
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 03:23 AM by mrdemocrat78
The purpose of this is not to bash anyone. The point is to focus on why your are choosing your candidate without calling anyone else out by name, no personal attacks, bacially... no b.s.

so here goes...

Obama is my candidate. Of the three front-runners, I find them to all pretty much have the same stances on the issues I am concerned about; or at least close enough to mine to not waiver me. That said, I am relying on pretty much one thing.

The Iraq War Resolution. Obama spoke out against it. And the way I look at it, that is the most important decision so far this century and he got it right.

Since they have pretty much all (except Kucinich, and I commend him on that) supported funding the war, I can't hold it against Obama any more than anyone else.

That said, there IS a difference, and I don't blame any of them for funding the war. I think we all know Bush would just leave them over there and say that the democrats abandoned the troops. It's a no-win situation.

Alright, that's all. The only person I called out was Bush, so let's see if you can do the same. I don't care who your candidate is;

JUST TELL ME WHY YOU WANT TO VOTE FOR THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards
IMO...The best chance of cleaning up the Banking and Insurance industries that have taken over Washington and are now lining their pockets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards - best health care plan
His ideas on key domestic and foreign policy are superior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdemocrat78 Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What makes his policies superior?
...Not an ounce of sarcasm intended. I seriously would like to understand them better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. While not single payer
of the 3 Dems, his is the one that will get us there the quickest.

His proposal offers individuals and employers a choice between private health insurance or public (Medicare, Medicaid, etc.). Its the only plan out there that pits public and private insurance programs against each other forces them to compete.

If you can't afford coverage, there are tax credits and other incentives to help everyone purchase it. There's more, I'll fill you in later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puckster Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Edwards
I really think he's the only candidate who is serious about getting us back to some kind of accountable, Constitution-based government. Cutting into the stranglehold that the corporations have on our government may not be a "sexy" issue for some, but I think it's critical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dennis!
Because he is not afraid to call them on their bullshit.

I voted for him in 2004, and will likely vote for him again in 2012.

He's definitely got my vote this time around!:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards/Hillary now, because health care is too important.
Its a matter of life or death for the really poor, seriously. I don't think Obama's plan does enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdemocrat78 Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But "WHAT" makes their plan better?
Again.. No sarcasm, just an honest inquiry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Universal Coverage.
I got in a lot of trouble when I was unemployed with no money and broke my collar bone. They told me it would heal itself and sent me home with a sling, and charged me $900. I didn't have health insurance and couldn't pay it, so it spiralled out of control and still effects my life. I was looking at Obama's plan, and from what I can tell, he does a lot to make it accessible to low income workers, but doesn't say that he will cover every single person in America like Hillary or Edwards does, and that's the coverage I needed when I had no money and no job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Of the top three
Obama is the most inspiring.

Edwards has the best policies.

Clinton has the best political machine.

On the results side we have this.

Obama - 1 win and one tie for first.

Edwards - 1 tie for second and one third place.

Clinton - 1 tie for second and one tie for first.

so far, Obama is leading, but not by much. Edwards is trailing and needs a clear win or at least a tie, Hillary is a close second to Obama.

This is all just my opinion looking at the results of Iowa, NH.

I haven't picked yet (my candidate, Joe Biden, dropped out).

(Sorry, Kucinich is a great guy, but I don't think he will get into contender status)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleOfNah Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Democratic candidates.
Maybe some local Greens. No Republicans, Libertarians, or Theocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sazemisery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Edwards
Because he is cute! :sarcasm:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. Any Dem who can kick these Repukes out of OUR house!!!
I don't really care which one. There are good things to say about all of them. I am in Michigan so the primary does not make much difference to me. I will fight for the nominee with every fiber of my being. Until then, I prefer to stay out of the fray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. They ALL can -see my sig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Obama, because he
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 05:54 AM by FrenchieCat
stood up when it was required and others were sitting ,
and gave the most honest speech, when it mattered,
to all of us.

Now our coffers are bare, and our soldiers are mutilated
while this war rages on, and everybody "say" that they have solutions.

But it was Barack Obama who showed he had the best judgement,
and demonstrated what some would call, REAL leadership.




Delivered on 26 October 2002 at an anti-war rally

I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income – to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

Now let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn’t simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.

The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not – we will not – travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. I support Dennis
He campaigns on the issues. He does not take money from the corporate fat cats. The DLC and the media are doing their best to marginalize him. For those reasons I will support him will my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. GRAVEL. The one OP (and everyone else) ignores. For his record. For his stands.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 06:44 AM by robbedvoter
Because, much as I like DK, he was fine when they only kicked Gravel from debates, and only objected about himself when his turn came. Gravel said "progressive candidates"
Ad in spite what Randi said on air yesterday, he is still in the race. Pass it on.

But since this thread is about the likes, I am proud of both Clinton & Obama for their truce yesterday. My respect for both went way up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. Edwards
IMHO, our best chance against the Corporate Fascists. Every issue can be traced back to their "stranglehold on democracy." And JE isn't afraid to say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC