Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Dem Debate Tonight - Predictions?.........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:15 AM
Original message
The Dem Debate Tonight - Predictions?.........
My prediction is that the big three candidates will be falling all over each other to be the first to create the "Kumbaya" moment that will get them face time on news channels and newspapers tomorrow. A pissed off Dennis Kucinich will point out that while the big three are bickering about gender and race - the important issues are not being addressed. Then Russert will ask Dennis if he's seen any UFO's lately or if he campaigned in Roswell.

Did I miss anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. GE won't let Kucinich debate - GE won't let me watch...
I stand with Kucinich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Since you are such a fan, can you explain to me why K. gives interviews to Fox?
"Kucinich learned of the judge's decision when he was handed a note during an interview with Fox Business Network's Neil Cavuto."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Kucinich is frozen-out by so much of the corporate media that he
must take any opportunity he can to be heard. Also, the rest of the corporate media treat Kucinich the way Fox treats the other Democrats, so, to Dennis, there isn't a great deal of difference. How's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Heard on Fox? He is used there for a comic relief...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. It is this kind of fucked-up condescension that will drive a good many
progressives from the party. I don't understand the tactic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. whole 2%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. So it's good to hear that you don't want our vote. Because you
won't get it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. I know. You will write in Kucinich -- so why should I care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. FOX uses him to show how "kooky" Democrats are.
It's sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. What's sad, is that right-wing Democrats get to say who's "kooky"
and who's not. It is sad that a real FDR Democrat is called "kooky" by someone claiming to be a Democrat. The condescension is laughable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Thinking K. is "kooky" makes one "right wing"? Is this a new litmus test?
Since 2% of Dems support him in the polls, 98% are thus all "right wingers"? Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. No. Just you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Oh, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Last I Heard Is Dennis Is Back In - But GE Is Going To Appeal And The Judge......
says he will issue an injunction and stop the debate if Kucinich is left off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
43. This is the important issue being overlooked by us all.
The whole last minute incident may be a game manipulated by the corporate-elite M$M so that in the end we won't have a debate. They don't want either Edwards or Kucinich to be heard. I know Edwards could use a debate performance for public exposure as he has been shown in a recent poll to be neck to neck with C. and O. in Nevada and could overtake them if he does well in the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I am assuming that GE will manage by tonight to exclude Dennis.
If not I will watch and listen ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
40. You can always watch Fox... He'll be there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tonight is going to be a curious night.
I think Obama (who is not the best debater) will come out of his shell. Hillary might too. Edwards is probably going to attack Hillary and Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. No, just Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. Just Hillary what?
She will attack? Come out of her shell? What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. Edwards will attack just Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hope to goodness that the moderators will stick to the ISSUES.
But, unfortunately, they want a fight. They can't help themselves to bring up race and gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Obama will take off the gloves on Iraq and healthcare
Edwards will back him up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. I agree - "Kumbaya" on MLK and race and then both attack Hillary w/ Dennis getting few words in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. and you think three of (male) them attacking Hillary will help whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Because it's not just "they" who want a fight but so does Edwards, and just with Hillary,
which will look ugly again if he does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
36. My spouse decided to vote for HRC because of JE's remark about her "crying."
He was undecided between the 2 of them but said he couldn't vote for JE after what he said. He thought it was a sexist thing to say. I must say I was disappointed in JE's remark, too. If I had a chance to talk to him I would challenge him on the remark, or at least ask him to clarify what he meant...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. it will suck because any voice for peace is excluded
did you notice that everyone who openly called for an end to war is out?

Not because of what People think, but what People who Program People think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Kooch is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. NO WAY
I


stand



corrected


:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kooch will throw hand grenades into the flower-arranging session
...bless him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Great -- that's exactly what I would hope for ... if I were a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. "If I were a Republican" LOLOLOLOLOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. so are you saying taht if K. is not my candidate I AM a Republican?
I already know that, according to you, that makes me "a right-wing" Democrat but I guess that's not bad enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
45. Why do people still think it's effective to make nice?
We have had seven years to try the polite approach. IT DOES NOT WORK.

If you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got. Swing for the testicles, repeatedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sorry global 1 but you must of missed the description about
Edwards-his angry. And Damn well he should be. As we speak right now I'm not sure if Treasury Secretary is alive. It has been reported on Worldreport.org that he is dead. Let's hope this is a rumor and that Henry Paulson is keeping it together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Not being "snarky", but what are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
47. I Don't Understand What You Are Talking About?.....
what's this about the Treasury Secretary? What about worldreport.org?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think you nailed it.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleOfNah Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. "Did I miss anything?"
Gravel getting the most applause?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
33. The hillary supporters will she say was the most
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 11:38 AM by Bread and Circus
amazing thing ever, the Obama supporters will say he was the most amazing thing ever, and the Edwards supporters will say he was the most amazing thing ever.

The pundits will talk about how Hillary "held her ground", how Obama will seem less than stellar, and how Edwards tried to gangbang Hillary.

The public at large (all 15 of them watching) will say Kucinich won even though he will have had about 17 seconds of microphone time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Don't forget that the Clinton supporters will also say that anyone who
doesn't support their candidate is stupid. That seems to be the gist of it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. I think we all say that...however, I now have about 20 people
on ignore (literally) so I'm starting to forget how stupid I am for supporting a Muslim, present voting, shucking and jiving, crack smoking, do nothing, Pro Iraq War, anti-choice, no issue, insubstantial, male chauvinist, lazy, fairy tale of a negroid.

Did I miss any other slur that's been cast at Obama around here or by other Democrats at large?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. As the "First Gentleman" wannabe would say,
"I feel your pain". I have a lot of folks on ignore, too. Just hang in there. We all can't be stupid!


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
38. I am not a Kucinich supporter, nor have I ever been. BUT excluding him from the debate
makes the Democratic Party look undemocratic! I think DK adds value to any debate about the future of this country and should be heard. There were several reasons I didn't support him as a candidate but I thought his views were refreshing and added substance to the earlier debates. I would have like to have heard more and was annoyed that he got so frozen out. That doesn't make sense to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
42. MSNBC will cancel. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. That's what the corporate elite wanted.
This whole incident was manufactured by them to shut the debate down so certain candidates couldn't be heard by the public. A poll yesterday showed Edwards in a tie in Nevada with C. and O. The M$M was told to nip any chance for Edwards to get more support in the bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
48. No Dennis, it's a snorefest between Tweedle-Dee, Tweedle-Dum and Tweedle-Doh
Add a little Dennis to the mix and it may be worth watching.

Otherwise I'm loading up on amphetamines, just so I can keep my7 eyes open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. if Kuch does get in
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 12:10 PM by GreenArrow
he will end up defending Hillary to Edwards' detriment. Which doesn't mean he'll leave Hillary unscathed; it just means that every time Edwards attempts an attack on Hillary, Kucinich will be there to spotlight the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC