Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AlterNet: Hillary's Dirty Campaign Tactics -- Nevada Suit Designed To Suppress Obama Voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 04:59 PM
Original message
AlterNet: Hillary's Dirty Campaign Tactics -- Nevada Suit Designed To Suppress Obama Voters
Hillary Clinton's Dirty Campaign Tactics
http://www.alternet.org/story/73782/

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted January 15, 2008.

In Iowa, New Hampshire and now Nevada, the Clinton campaign has sought to suppress the vote of her rivals' supporters. The headlines say the latest schism among the top Democratic presidential candidates is over gender and race. But on the ground in the presidential season's opening states, there is a darker narrative: that Hillary Clinton will not just fight hard, but fight dirty, to win. And her tactic of choice is attempting to suppress the votes of her rival's supporters.

The latest example is from Nevada, where the Nevada State Education Association is widely seen as filing a suit on Clinton's behalf to stop Las Vegas' most powerful union, Culinary Workers Local 226, from caucusing inside downtown casinos after the union endorsed Barack Obama. The tactic foments a split along racial and class lines in arguably the strongest union city in America. "It's horrible," said one longtime Nevada activist, who didn't want his name used. "It will cause fights and damage that will last for years." But the Clinton campaign has made similar moves in New Hampshire and Iowa.

* snip *

While Clinton campaign surrogates have verbally accused Obama of many things, from "fairy tale" answers on Iraq to being a drug user while they served the country more nobly, intentionally suppressing voters -- especially under-represented, low-income minority union members -- stands out in 2008's Democratic presidential campaign.

After all, the Democratic National Committee moved Nevada's caucuses to the top of the primary lineup so minority voices could be heard -- and no organization is more aligned with those voters in Nevada than the Culinary Union, whose training materials for its members are printed in four languages. In contrast, the state teachers, whose suit seeks to stop those workers from caucusing in nine "at-large" precincts in big downtown casinos, have a statewide base because its members work throughout Nevada.

* snip *

In other words, a strong turnout from the tens of thousands of Culinary Workers Union members in Las Vegas, where 70 percent of Nevada voters live, could swing the state's early foray into presidential politics. In 2000, fewer than 1,000 people participated in Nevada's caucuses. In 2004, that number was about 9,000. This year, estimates are in the tens of thousands. Nevada political insiders say the NSEA lawsuit is designed to suppress Obama's voters.

* snip *

"This (caucus) plan was created by some of the same people who are plaintiffs in the suit against it," he said. "It's not that they didn't like the plan when Clinton was ahead."

Digg!

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election, with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. I stood in the crowd at the Obama/Reno, NV appearance yesterday next to a young Latino couple
They had switched their support to Obama because they have family in Las Vegas who work on the Strip who believe Hillary and Bill Clinton are behind the lawsuit. So, whether the Clinton campaign wants to admit it or not, they have egg on their faces and they appear to be behind voter suppression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Interesting anecdote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I am relieved to hear your story.
I'm tired of the bad guys winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Alternet is almost always spot on. One of the most credible sources
out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The trend makes my skin crawl.
But the Clinton campaign has made similar moves in New Hampshire and Iowa.

In the first primary state, her supporters -- backed by New Hampshire Democratic Party officials -- pressured poll workers to remove observers stationed by the Obama campaign. These volunteers had intended to track voters as part of their get-out-the-vote effort. That tactic came after the Clinton campaign sent a mailing targeting women that said Obama would not "stand up and protect" a women's right to choose because he had voted "present" -- but not yes -- on a few abortion-related bills in the Illinois legislature.

"I've kept most mailers I got from every presidential candidate this year, and that mailer was the absolute worst," wrote New Hampshire blogger Peter Glenshaw. "Never mind that Obama has a 100 percent approval rating from Planned Parenthood in Illinois. Never mind that Planned Parenthood asked him to vote 'present' on those bills."

And in Iowa, the Clinton campaign -- with the help of the state's largest newspaper, the Des Moines Register, which endorsed her -- was discouraging students from returning from winter break to vote, even though their right to do so was legal, said Rick Hasen, who writes a respected election law blog. "Indeed such voting could help to compensate for the otherwise anti-democratic nature of Iowa's role in the presidential election process," he said.

As the nomination process has unfolded and Clinton has encountered resistance in every state so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Unfreakin'fortunately this
doesn't surprise me because I knew from hillary's vote on the IRW that she was headed down this road and nothing was going to stop her.

The only question is..What will stop her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. We have the vote to do it if we can come together.
And as this election unfolds, that is my most fervent hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rec'd ~ Alternet has
been a reliable source of Democratic news for years and I very much appreciate them reporting on this. Thank you, Atomic, for bringing it over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for posting this, AK
You can always count on the Clintons to act just like Repugs. Why is that?

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I don't know, but I do know how completely deflated this tactic makes me feel.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 05:32 PM by AtomicKitten
I never thought I'd live to see a Democrat using voter suppression to win an election.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. hillary's like a stampeding buffalo
that needs to be turned around before she does anymore damagage.

It's the dlc(dinos)..it's not Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. it's utter narcissism and a disregard for the democratic process
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Work that meme, anti-Hillarites!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks hillary echoer...
We'll do what we can to stop that mofo vote suppressor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Post those one liners Hillbot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I didn't know Alternet supported Obama
Do you have proof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. hey
:thumbsup: on your Obama avatar.

Coolest thing I've seen so far today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Hey yourself
Just decided last week. Kerry's endorsement helped. If he's going out on a limb, I reckon I better get out there with him.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Very, very happy about the endorsement.
I loved Kerry's speech in SC. He is arguably the most eloquent surrogate Obama has going for him, and I will be eternally grateful he stepped forward and spoke up on Obama's behalf. Truth is, it didn't surprise me but I was nonetheless delighted. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Great! I'm glad Kerry's endorsement
got you on board and I know it's going to help a lot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. do you even know what a Meme is? doubtful.
Calling Voter Suppression memetic does not stop it from being Voter Suppression, now does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Fuck the voters if they don't wanna vote for the Goldwater Girl
That's what you are saying...

Let's make sure people who have the right to vote CAN'T. In most worlds, that's called CHEATING. Then again, cheating is a very familiar trait in the Clinton toolkit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Honest Question: If they had nominated Clinton, would this lawsuit exist? NO.. that is why it's
unfair. Again, if Hillary wins the nomination and proceeds to the General Election - these are people she needs to go out and vote for her.. and this is NOT a way to garner their support.

These tactics scare me, because although I want Obama to win... Clinton is my 2nd choice. And, if we continue with these tactics.. all we're doing is setting ourselves up for a Huge Dem nomination.. followed by another November loss to a Republican.

WHY CAN'T OUR CANDIDATES SEE THAT?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Three of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit authored the plan
they are now seeking to get an injunction against. All three Clinton supporters.

The suit was filed two days after Obama got the endorsement.

So, your math is exactly right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. And don't forget this
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 05:47 PM by Debi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. vewy interesting
funny how all the pieces fit together so nicely!

thanks for this info ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Thanks RoadRAge...
There's no compromising with hilliarys and she is not on any choice of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Clintons are getting down and dirty
And it is a digusting sight. And it scares me that any Democrat is not extremely angered by this right-wing tactic by the Clintons. And yes, of course the Clintons are responsible for it. How naive do you have to be to think that this is just a coincidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. the trend is flat-out depressing ....
but your Bush Lie Dispenser made me laugh - thanks! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. No problem!
Sometimes it's easy to forget who the real enemy is, even if the Clintons are starting to act like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. Where are Clintons Supporters on this??
Do you agree with it? Disagree with it - but will still vote for her anyway as she is the best choice? Seriously - if Obama pulled something like this and supported an initiave to stop people from voting just because he wasn't endorsed by that group - I would have some serious doubts about supporting him.

This boils down to DEMOCRACY.. and it wasn't an issue when Clinton thought she'd win the Cullinary endorsement. It's only an issue now. That is a big problem to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. One Hillary supporter's comment on this (on another thread) was "BFD!"
They said it's no big deal that Hillary may have an advantage. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Just as suspected..hillary echoers
are incapable of seeing any other picture big or small.. besides hillary on some imagainary throne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Yup. And there are still no Hillary supporters here.
Sad but not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Hey Jen.
This sh*t is the epitome of depressing. I never thought I'd see a Democrat suppressing the vote, well, ever. This is precisely the atmosphere that has got to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
37. Meh. Unions will go to many lengths to get what they want...
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 11:37 PM by annie1
and for whatever reason they are supporting her in the first place, is why they're placing this suit. they want her to win. jmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. trying to win by disenfranchising voters isn't a good thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC