Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Year of the Youth Vote: Is Obama's campaign the first ever to be carried on the backs of the young?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:22 PM
Original message
Year of the Youth Vote: Is Obama's campaign the first ever to be carried on the backs of the young?
TIME: The Year of the Youth Vote
By DAVID VON DREHLE
Thursday, Jan. 31, 2008

....(Missiouri Governor Claire) McCaskill endorsed Obama (at the urging of her daughter Maddie) — a big boost in an important Super Tuesday primary state. And the story of that endorsement is the Democratic-nomination battle etched in miniature. Kids like Maddie Esposito are the muscle of Obama's army. His campaign has become the first in decades — maybe in history — to be carried so far on the backs of the young. His crushing margin of victory in Iowa came almost entirely from voters under 25 years old, and as the race moved to New Hampshire and Nevada, their votes helped him stay competitive. In South Carolina on Saturday, Jan. 26, Obama's better than 3-to-1 advantage among under-30 voters more than neutralized Clinton's narrower edge among over-65s. Now, as the candidates shift to the coast-to-coast, Dixie-to-Dakota battlefield of Feb. 5, Obama is counting on a wave of Democrats experiencing their own McCaskill moments, roused to his banner by the fervent — if sometimes vague — urgings of youth.

Caroline Kennedy's three teenagers began working on her last year. "They were the first people who made me realize that Barack Obama is the President we need," the daughter of John F. Kennedy told an audience in Washington on Jan. 28. Her decision, joined by her uncle Senator Edward Kennedy, to place her father's mantle on Obama's shoulders was both a boost to Obama and a rebuke to the Clintons.

Frustrated by feckless Washington, energized by the unscripted, pundit-baffling freedom of a wide-open race, young people are voting in numbers rarely seen since the general election of 1972 — the first in which the voting age was lowered to 18. Obama is both catalyst and beneficiary. In state after state, he has drawn more young voters than any of his competitors. For a group of voters with no memory of a time before Bushes and Clintons, Obama is a fresh face. His opponents promise to fight, but Obama promises healing. His is the language of possibility, which is the native tongue of the young. And if he happens to be light on details — well, what are details but the dull pieces of disassembled dreams? "I had a friend tell me this was impossible, quoting all these political-science statistics at me to show that it's hopeless to try to organize students," says Michelle Stein, 20, media coordinator for Obama's youth campaign in Missouri. "Now he says, 'You were right, I was wrong. Where do I sign up?'"

Combining digital-age technology with old-fashioned shoe leather, the Illinois Senator first rallied Iowa students to cancel Clinton's cakewalk. While enthusiastic Democrats of all ages produced a 90% increase in turnout for the first caucuses, the number of young voters was up half again as much: 135%. The kids preferred Obama over the next-closest competitor by more than 4 to 1. The youngest slice — the under-25 set, typically among the most elusive voters in all of politics — gave Obama a net gain of some 17,000 votes. He won by just under 20,000....

In a year of unprecedented levels of participation by Democrats of all ages, Obama is counting on a youthquake that reverberates upward. On the short road remaining to Super Tuesday, the race may come down to this: Will the youthful ranks of Obama's movement grow virally as the election goes national? And will a public long trained to follow youthful trends be swept up in the tide?...

http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1708570,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't forget to mention that many of the Iowan "youth" were students from neighboring IL paid
to help in Iowa. Many accounts of people noticing IL license plates and kids who came over for 3+ days to help Obama. You only need to be in the state for 3 days and the caucus coordinators don't even check IDs for verification of residencey.

This is why the Iowa caususes are an inflated reading of really what's out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Provide links for your bullshit please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. All the campaigns had volunteers from out-of-state working in Iowa and NH.
There may be a few hundred college students who study in Iowa (and so they live in Iowa most of the year and will vote in Iowa on November 4th) but they have cars with other States' licence plates.

If it's really true that the caucus coordinators don't check residency then I agree it could be a problem. In which case then I guess the good folks of Iowa should find a way to solve it.

But in any case it looks like even if you completely ignore the under-25 age-group, Obama would still have won the Iowa caucuses (but by a much smaller margin).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. bullfuckingshit of the most disgusting and dishonest kind. YOU should
be ashamed. There is no evidence at all to suggest the lie that you're smearing around. This is why I dislike the Clinton campaign. It's built on slime and smearing. And people like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. the red x is really handy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Eugene McCarthy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You're right! Thanks for the reminder. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's a good thing when young people are catered to. Usually they are ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think, so far, Iowa is the only place they showed in large numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Eugene McCarthy, Geroge McGovern, John Anderson, Howard Dean...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. JFK is the classic example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. yes my sister was "young" then
and all her friends were big jfk supporters...after years of nixon jfk was a breath of fresh air.

it`s truly disgusting to read people opinions that the "young" are somehow are to stupid to know who to vote. many of my generation gave their lives in a war they could not vote for or against.. maybe those who ridicule our youth should study history or shut the fuck up.

by the way----Amendment XXVI (the Twenty-Sixth Amendment) of the United States Constitution, ratified on July 1, 1971, standardized the voting age to 18. --->It was passed in response to the Vietnam War<---- and to partially overrule the Supreme Court's decision in Oregon v. Mitchell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Amendment XXV!
If you can be drafted and die for your country, not being able to vote would be outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. it`s their world- they better vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC