Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton just lost the election, garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:42 PM
Original message
Clinton just lost the election, garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance
garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3167528&mesg_id=3167528

It is paternalistic, authoritarian, unpopular, and a sure loser for social libertarians, moderates, independents, most democrats, and just about everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well if the Hill bomb has gone off can we get JE back in the race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Oh why oh why did John leave us????????..i will not leave him and obama's followers are making it
harder and harder for me to look his way..i am about damn sick and tired of correcting their propaganda!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. "obama's followers are making it harder and harder for me to look his way"
You're not voting for the "followers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. me too and i don't like Hillary..but i can hardly stand Obama now because his followers have turned
me off big time..they are arrogant and liars.

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. how many times are you going to post this propaganda...i am not
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 03:46 PM by flyarm
for either of these candidates but you are sure about to push me the other way..with all these lies and propaganda!!

Hillary's plan is all but Edwards plan..if you are so damn ignorant..who wants to go towards your candidate?


you are doing your candidate an injustice..and yourself..because you are looking more and more foolish by the minute!
fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. did she actually say-garnish or garnishment?
can`t believe anyone would say that. shit i`ve had my share over the years and that word is pretty dam unpopular with me and a whole lot of people in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. garnish with a piece of parsley or a fruit wedge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
60. that word will not win her converts. that's all we need. garnishing
working people's wages. welcome to the gulag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. They're already garnished for Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. yes---- but that`s a very unpopular word to use
did she use it?

both candidates health care plans are about the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. But one is universal, the other isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. They don't give my SS contributions to private insurance companies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. They let you do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. No they don't. I'm one of the uninsured.
I'm self employed and I simply can't afford the $500-700 a month they want. I have a pre-existing condition, meaning that I've been to a doctor for something at least once in my life. That's what a pre-existing condition is. My income isn't steady and I already have enough obligations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. And you're against mandated universal health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Depends on how much it costs and how they'll make me pay it.
If it's indexed to my income it won't be so bad but if it's a set monthly premium it would be harder on me.

Look, I don't have a problem with the rationale behind the mandate. My main problem is that we are handing the GOP a club to beat us with, and we're not even going to get single payer out of it.

It's shaping up to be the "Hillarycare" fiasco part deux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. It will only work if it is indexed to income.
I'm in a similar situation to you and I think if it's handled correctly it's a powerful reason to vote Democratic. Reliable and certain health care for families and individuals trumps the tax argument.

I'd like to see an ad with the tax cost of one day of war next to the tax cost fur universal health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. No they don't. I'm one of the uninsured.
I'm self employed and I simply can't afford the $500-700 a month they want. I have a pre-existing condition, meaning that I've been to a doctor for something at least once in my life. That's what a pre-existing condition is. My income isn't steady and I already have enough obligations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
57. No they funnel the money to defense contractors and put you bills on the national debt tab
This is just one more scam to suck money out of the working stiff's pockets and what should have we been expecting otherwise :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. it is obvious theobama IPOD KIDS haven't drawn a paycheck yet..
they just post his bullshit talking points...

my hubby and i already have health insurance payment requirements withdrawn from our paychecks..and retirement checks!!

who the fuck are they kidding??????????

certainly not me ..and they are showing their foolishness every minute here!!

fly..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. "apply only to workers who can afford health coverage but refuse to buy it,"
Good policy.
Better than Obama's leave-most-children-ill plot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. really? she actually said that?
who decides who can afford it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it's the biggest gaffe of the entire political season thus far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Media is really running with it too
Bad News for her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. As much as I would like to bash Hillary about this.....
Health Care HAS to be handled like the social security program and that means everyone pays.

"Garnish the wages" is just another political hit term for payroll deductions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Social Security is a government program so yes everyone pays
Health Care is through Corporate America. We shouldn't be forced to subsidize huge pay for CEOS. JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. we are already garnished NOW..if we have health insurance..we are already being charged through
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 03:50 PM by flyarm
our insurance and our insurance fees for people who do not have health insurance..and furthermore and more dangerous to all of us ..the fees taken out for those with no health insurance are taken off our lifetime cap of insurance!

so we are being doubly garnished now!! and one of the ways effects our own life long care!

and we are paying to be fucked now!

dearly

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. The mandates were always a deal breaker n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, this is a SERIOUSLY damaging blow to her campaign.
The last thing people in this receeding economy want to hear is "we will garnish your wages".

Nice going Hillary. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. BULLSHIT AND THAT IS propaganda why don't you find out what you are
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 03:54 PM by flyarm
being garnished now for..oh i know... that would not work into your propaganda!!

but see we adults know what we are paying for and how we are already being garnished..now..today..and tommorrow..and we are paying big time for it in more ways than just coming out of our paychecks!

oh yeah..it is already coming out of our paychecks!!..we grownups know all about it..back to your ipod now..



fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Hillary garnishes our paychecks; Obama redistributes revenue wisely
--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. what pigs crap did you swallow?
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:11 PM by flyarm
guess you better look at what Obama promised in his state and never delivered health insurance wise..and don't miss this .........

the people of his state better damn well hope they get Edwards health plan that Hillary copied!!

fly


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22971762/
Nuclear leaks, response tested Obama in Senate
His legislation is re-made after objections from industry, regulators
By Mike McIntire

updated 12:37 a.m. ET, Sun., Feb. 3, 2008
When residents in Illinois voiced outrage two years ago upon learning that the Exelon Corporation had not disclosed radioactive leaks at one of its nuclear plants, the state’s freshman senator, Barack Obama, took up their cause.

Mr. Obama scolded Exelon and federal regulators for inaction and introduced a bill to require all plant owners to notify state and local authorities immediately of even small leaks. He has boasted of it on the campaign trail, telling a crowd in Iowa in December that it was “the only nuclear legislation that I’ve passed.”


snip:
A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very different story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks.

Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee. But, contrary to Mr. Obama’s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate.



snips:

Another Obama donor, John W. Rowe, chairman of Exelon, is also chairman of the Nuclear Energy Institute, the nuclear power industry’s lobbying group, based in Washington. Exelon’s support for Mr. Obama far exceeds its support for any other presidential candidate.


Since 2003, executives and employees of Exelon, which is based in Illinois, have contributed at least $227,000 to Mr. Obama’s campaigns for the United States Senate and for president. Two top Exelon officials, Frank M. Clark, executive vice president, and John W. Rogers Jr., a director, are among his largest fund-raisers.




that trial of Rezko is looking more and more interesting by the day!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
51. do you have a job? do you have health insurance with your job? your check is already garnished!
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:46 PM by flyarm
save your bullshit!!

please keep up your studies..you have alot to learn..but you will get that in life ..after school and mommy and daddy aren't paying for your health insurance anymore!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #51
65. Yes .,, you True Believers are really brainwashed
When somebody doesn't blow smoke up your candied asses, you lose all control.

You swear, you rant, you lie, you screed, you scream. Spoiled rich kids, irate that they have to share the world with people they don't like.

And the constant harping about "mommy and daddy" is just funny. Why are you so obsessed with people's parents and being in school? Are you all under 18? (BTW, I turned 19 in May, 1977.)

So, this is the Audacity of Hope that the new Messiah is offering? A bunch of potty-mouthed, whining idol-worshippers? Count me out!

--p!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Keep Dreaming & Quit Lying.
Just because Obama is a Status Quo Kinda guy you have to hate on change!
SAD!

Hill Yes! Hillary Can Clean up This Mess!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Obama leaves 15 mil uninsured and is anti-choice
He doesn't give consumers or businesses a chance to purchase from a government based health insurance plan like Medicare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. He doesn't? Are you sure about that?
Democratic hopefuls agree on Medicare as a healthcare model

WASHINGTON -- Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards have been sniping at each other for months over healthcare, but there's one thing the top Democratic presidential candidates agree on: Americans of all ages should have the choice of buying a government-run plan modeled on Medicare.

The idea, which would set up a competition between a new government plan and private insurance programs, has been overshadowed by the political horse race. But it's one of the most far-reaching and controversial proposals for making health insurance more affordable and more widely available.

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-na-healthplans21jan21,1,6496355.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. The Edwards Effect
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:15 PM by flyarm
The Edwards Effect


By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: February 1, 2008

If 2008 is different, it will be largely thanks to Mr. Edwards. He made a habit of introducing bold policy proposals -- and they were met with such enthusiasm among Democrats that his rivals were more or less forced to follow suit.

It's hard, in particular, to overstate the importance of the Edwards health care plan, introduced in February.

Before the Edwards plan was unveiled, advocates of universal health care had difficulty getting traction, in part because they were divided over how to get there. Some advocated a single-payer system -- a k a Medicare for all -- but this was dismissed as politically infeasible. Some advocated reform based on private insurers, but single-payer advocates, aware of the vast inefficiency of the private insurance system, recoiled at the prospect.

With no consensus about how to pursue health reform, and vivid memories of the failure of 1993-1994, Democratic politicians avoided the subject, treating universal care as a vague dream for the distant future.

But the Edwards plan squared the circle, giving people the choice of staying with private insurers, while also giving everyone the option of buying into government-offered, Medicare-type plans -- a form of public-private competition that Mr. Edwards made clear might lead to a single-payer system over time. And he also broke the taboo against calling for tax increases to pay for reform.

Suddenly, universal health care became a possible dream for the next administration. In the months that followed, the rival campaigns moved to assure the party's base that it was a dream they shared, by emulating the Edwards plan. And there's little question that if the next president really does achieve major health reform, it will transform the political landscape.

snip:

Furthermore, to the extent that this remains a campaign of ideas, it remains true that on the key issue of health care, the Clinton plan is more or less identical to the Edwards plan. The Obama plan, which doesn't actually achieve universal coverage, is considerably weaker.


Paul Krugman joined The New York Times in 1999 as a columnist on the Op-Ed Page and continues as professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University.

Mr. Krugman received his B.A. from Yale University in 1974 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1977. He has taught at Yale, MIT and Stanford. At MIT he became the Ford International Professor of Economics.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. this what basically killed her first plan
well that and no one could figure it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. chortle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. Mandatory corporate healthcare is NOT universal health care.
Nice one, Hillary. When is Willard Romney going to charge her with plagiarism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Refuse or just Can't!?
she wants to Guarantee that her insurance friends get to squeeze every available nickle for their yachts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hillary! Change. Progress. Wage Garnishment.
I can see that new slogan for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Please link to where Hillary Clinton used the word "garnished"...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. Stop the stupid shit...
this is no different than the way we pay for SS and medicare now. Either you want universal health care, or you don't. If you don't, then vote republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. thank you... so glad to see some adults around these parts!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Half the Country Plus Some Independents will not agree to
National Healthcare--Single Payer. It is a waste of time to even
discuss it. Rasising taxes to pay for health care is socialized
medicine for them. If there is no GOP Support--it will never pass.
Too serious an issue not to have BiPartisan Support.

Hilary has found a way to provide less costly health care for
everyone using Private and Public Cooperation. The Public will
buy this. It will be set up in such a way that should the
public reach the point where they will accept Single Payer
it can easily be converted to Single Payer.

Do not forget, if you are happy with your insurance now--you
can keep it and be happy.

If John Edwards had thought for one minute he could have passed
Single Payer , he would have done it in a NY Minute. There
are realities to be accepted.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. absolutely..thank you..another adult around here that gets it!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Actually, a payroll deduction is a smart idea, IMO. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. For a single payer system, NOT for greedy private insurers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
63. You can pay toward a government plan if you choose
So that's essentially the same thing as contributing to a single payer plan. If other people want to pay more to buy private insurance, how does that hurt you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. The plan will not get through Congress with that provision
When the insurance lobby is done with it you will have the mandates, but without the ability to choose government coverage. That will be a catch-all for the poor and uninsurable. The rest will be required to purchase private insurance. Bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm sure the Repubs said the same thing to FDR about Social Security
oh wait....they're STILL saying it.

Either Universal Coverage is universal or it's not. I don't agree with privatizing Social Security either -- do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. i have been doing my own research on your candidate and i don't like what i see...
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:08 PM by flyarm
like the health insurance he promised in his own state and then did not deliver and this that he promised the people of his state then sold them out..

you can post all your talking point and propaganda..but us grown ups do our own research and this grown up does not like what i am seeing..


seems the people of Obama's state better hope they have Edwards health plan that Hillary copied..looks like they are going to need it!!
fly

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22971762/
Nuclear leaks, response tested Obama in Senate
His legislation is re-made after objections from industry, regulators
By Mike McIntire

updated 12:37 a.m. ET, Sun., Feb. 3, 2008
When residents in Illinois voiced outrage two years ago upon learning that the Exelon Corporation had not disclosed radioactive leaks at one of its nuclear plants, the state’s freshman senator, Barack Obama, took up their cause.

Mr. Obama scolded Exelon and federal regulators for inaction and introduced a bill to require all plant owners to notify state and local authorities immediately of even small leaks. He has boasted of it on the campaign trail, telling a crowd in Iowa in December that it was “the only nuclear legislation that I’ve passed.”


snip:
A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very different story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks.

Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee. But, contrary to Mr. Obama’s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate.



snips:

Another Obama donor, John W. Rowe, chairman of Exelon, is also chairman of the Nuclear Energy Institute, the nuclear power industry’s lobbying group, based in Washington. Exelon’s support for Mr. Obama far exceeds its support for any other presidential candidate.


Since 2003, executives and employees of Exelon, which is based in Illinois, have contributed at least $227,000 to Mr. Obama’s campaigns for the United States Senate and for president. Two top Exelon officials, Frank M. Clark, executive vice president, and John W. Rogers Jr., a director, are among his largest fund-raisers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
37. Hillary is going to get the healthcare money for her
lobbyists my any means necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. nice try, what do you think employee health insurance is? and most colleges require it to enroll
my daughter has to provide her insurance information every time she signs up for classes at the University... if she does not give company name and policy number, they will give her health insurance and charge her account... and she has no job! no insurance, no college!

Welcome to the 21st century!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. the Obama camp is giving these young'uns talking points of which they have zero knowledge..and they
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:23 PM by flyarm
repeat the bullshit and think.. becaue they are ignorant ...the rest of us are...

hey ipod kids..we pay your insurance..we get it..enough with the propaganda and bullshit..you are being made fools of!!

from an Edwards supporter

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. young voters have no clue... and Obama is taken 'em for a ride.....
My daughter will vote for the person I tell her is the best choice... just as my father told me who to vote for when I was 18...

in MN when Jesse Ventura ran for Governor, he came on campus... bought pizza and talked to the young people... After they came out and voted for him and he was elected, the young people were amazed when he made the statement, "If you are smart enough to go to college, you are smart enough to figure out how to pay for it."... when they asked why, after they voted for him? he said he never promised them anything.... they were so caught up with the moment of an ex-wrestler running... they forgot to ask him a question of what he would do for them....

young voters have no clue... and Obama is taken em for a ride.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
44. Stop it. Misinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. i have been trying to stop this bullshit propaganda all day,,these obama kids
are reminding me of Bushbot sheeple every day..

and they sure are not helping their candidate with Edwards supporters of which i am....

makes the resolve only more solidified to vote for Edwards ...on Tuesday for many of us..

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
45. the statement said one of many options, not she "will". dont let facts stop you tho nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
53. Did she really say that?
For fuck's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. no she didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. Yes, she said an enforcement possibility was going after people's wages. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Possible or definite?
There IS a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
58. Exactly why Barack made his plan optional. Obama uses his intelligence positively enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC