Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conventional msm wisdom says, If HRC wins 20 out of the 22 states in play on Tuesday, even if the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:46 PM
Original message
Conventional msm wisdom says, If HRC wins 20 out of the 22 states in play on Tuesday, even if the
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:07 PM by IsItJustMe
delegate count is close, it's all over for BO.

I was watching CNN earlier and they had three 'wise' political analologist on there. It's very possible, given the way that the Dems appropriate there delegates, that HRC can win most of the states and still be very close, if not damn near equal, to BO, in the delicate count (i.e. Nevada: Hillary won popular vote while BO won more delegates).

I don't buy that argument at all. To me, if the delegate count is close after Tuesday, the race is still on.

What say you?

Edit: correction 10-12 20-22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are MSM elements who are pushing Hillary harder than a constipated turd...
there is no doubt about that. So I would take that talk with a huge bag of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. She won't. Obama's winning in Illinois, Georgia, Utah, Connecticut and California.
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 03:54 PM by Alexander
He's tied with her in Alabama, Missouri and Arizona.

He will probably win the Alaska and North Dakota caucuses.

There is no way Obama will walk away with fewer than 4 states on Tuesday. There is a good chance of him winning more than 6 states, which will be devastating to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. What polls did you use for this? thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. I can answer that.
Zogby has Obama up 2 in California.
The Deseret News has Obama up 24 in Utah.
Polls in Georgia have Obama up big there.
Alabama is split, within the polls.

Hope that helped! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. yeah i agree its all about the delegates
though a several wins would be really nice, especially in cali
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's what I was thinking. It is about the delegates. We saw to 2000 when Gore got beat, even
though he had a half million more votes than GW. It is about the delegates, bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. there's now way he'll only win two states tho
Illinois, utah and Georgia are locks with others looking pretty good like idaho, delaware, colorado, conn and cali
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. She'll be lucky to win 10 of the 22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Advantage Obama, if he's within striking distance after Tuesday.
Pasted from an earlier post of mine ---

Here's what's coming up the rest of Feburary that could give Obama the BIG MO...>!

Feb 9:
Washington caucuses - Obama does well in caucus states, run good in Seattle
Nebraska caucuses -

Feb 10
Maine caucuses -

Feb 12:
Virginia - diverse, Tim Kaine endorsement helps
Maryland - diverse, large African-American vote
DC - a given

Feb 19:
Wisconsin - anti-war, lots of students
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Hope those caucus states
are more like Iowa instead of Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Nevada was good for Obama.
He was supposed to lose by 10-20 points and ended up winning the most delegates.

No one in the media is writing this but I think Obama does better in caucus states because white people who might vote against Obama in the voting booth don't want to stand next to their neighbors and have to explain why they voted against a candidate just for being black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. I read about him making a play for Nebraska
Smart. If he doesn't win on Super Tuesday it will revive his campaign. If he does win it could be the final nail in the coffin to push Clinton out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's a really strange spin - a head scratcher
Clinton loses the delegate count and the majority of states in play and this somehow eliminates Obama? WTF?
Somebody is goofin' ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think most states are not winner take all
so winning and losing doesn't matter as much as the delegate count - I don't think this thing will be decided on Tuesday....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No states are winner take all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Well there you go
lol - won't be over on Tuesday I don't think....but you know we won't be deciding that the M$M will decide for us - just like they did with our candidates....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. From my understanding, the Dems are apportioned according to the vote; where as the Repugs are
winner take all. In general, I think this is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Winning and losing state counts for the MSM in declaring "winner"
regardless of delegate count. It's part of the election night story.

For example, Clinton "won" Nevada in the media playbook even though she lost the delegate count 13-12
So there is a perception advantage to "winning' a state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Yes indeed
please see my post #17

good of them to do that for us - but when it comes to the convention I think they might actually count delegates - but then again maybe they use electronic voting machines and delegate voter suppression - now a days one never knows....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. What states are we talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton HAS to Win Super Tuesday because Obama
Is going to win VA, MD, and Washington area. Hillary better have a big lead after Tuesday or she is finished
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. She not only needs to win, she needs to whipe the floor with Obama.
That means win California by 10+.
That means slaughter Obama in NY.
That means win Delaware by a big margin, along with MA, NJ and Connecticut.
That means she needs to get within 10 of Obama in Illinois.
That means she needs to get within 10 of Obama in Georgia.
That means she needs to win Alabama by a wide margin.

If Obama stays within 100 delegates of Clinton after Tuesday, he will become the favorite. If it's 200 delegates, it'll be a toss-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Lowering expectations for our guy much? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. No, because I think Obama will do extremely well.
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:34 PM by Drunken Irishman
My expectations are that he either wins California, or loses barely. I think he'll take Missouri, come close to NJ, win Alabama and Georgia, cruise in Utah, win in Idaho, Colorado and one of those Dakotas.

Clinton, though, CAN'T succeed in a tight Super Tuesday. Obama will have the money, the momentum and he'll start getting some major endorsements. The only way Clinton "wins" Tuesday is if she cleans up and I don't think she will. If it's close, Obama will be declared the winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. If Hillary continues to win states but Obama maintains delegate parity, I would assume more super
delegates would gravitate toward Clinton so that the choice of the voters is heard, not some obscure mathematical formula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh this thing is far from over.
I don't think this will be over until the Great State Of Oregon gets to vote in May. Thank You very much.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. I saw that. They said if Hillary wins 20 of the 22 states, even if Obama gets more delegates,
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 04:06 PM by jenmito
it's over. And that ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. If the delegate count is close, it ain't over.
Not by a longshot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. I think it comes down to NY and IL...
because if all things are substantially equal (meaning substantially close counts on delegates), then NY and IL will be the only states where either candidate can have a +59% showing and get bonus delegates. It appears much more likely at this point that Obama would break 59% in IL before Hillary breaks 59% in NY. This would be the biggest headline of Super Tuesday IMO.

The polling data suggests at this point that they are going to split the states quite evenly.

Whoever was on CNN pushing this "wisdom" was either an idiot or a paid shill. Clinton is not going anywhere after Super Tuesday even if she loses every state in play. Obama is not going anywhere after Super Tuesday even if he loses every state in play either. Both candidates have a shitload of money and will walk away from ST with a shitload of delegates. One of them will be up, perhaps by a decent number, but unless all the polling is waaaay off there is not going to be a knockout punch for at least another month. Even in the worst case scenario for either candidate, they could still probably point to a few successes (Obama : "We came within 3 points of Clinton in CA after being down by 20" or Clinton: "We finished one point behind Obama in CA") and march ahead.

What might happen if one candidate delivers a death blow to the other is that the polls in the remaining states shift to the big ST winner...but even still that is not guaranteed. What if Obama wins big on ST and the CLinton machine kicks into high gear and it works? She could still pull out TX, OH, get Florida and Michigan seated, etc. Ditto for Obama. What is he barely loses in all ST states in play but the exposure kicks in and his numbers surge?

This thing is going on for the next month AT LEAST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. Hillary won't win 20 states. Neither will Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes, because the MSM is so pro-Hillary. When will poor Obama catch a break?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. I beleive that the delegate count will be close after Tuesday...
And the race will go on. But if Obama wins California, all bets are off, and it is over for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC