Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada's NDP sends letters to Clinton/Obama regarding NAFTA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 03:29 PM
Original message
Canada's NDP sends letters to Clinton/Obama regarding NAFTA
The leader of Canada's federal New Democratic Party has sent letters to both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama pledging the NDP's support for the re-opening of NAFTA. I have received permission to repost the contents here. As they are virtually identical, I will post only one, with personalizations noted.

Jack Layton, MP, Député
Toronto – Danforth
Leader, New Democratic Party
Chef, Nouveau parti démocratique

March 1, 2008

Dear Senator (Clinton/Obama):

Canadians are watching the Democratic Primaries with great interest, particularly the debate around the future of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Working Canadians, like working Americans, are deeply concerned that this agreement has cost hundreds of thousands of jobs and has not helped us build the greener, fairer economy that we must leave as a legacy to our children.

(One of the following paragraphs is addressed to Clinton, the other to Obama.)

I have heard you say: “I believe in trade, I just want to make sure that the rules of the road apply to everybody and they are fair and that they reflect the interests of workers and not just corporate profits.
************
I have heard you say: “Let’s get real about the future of trade in this country, let’s get real about NAFTA. It simply isn’t working for all Americans. I am not just going to talk about what is wrong with NAFTA. I am going to fix it.”

(The rest of the letter is identical for both candidates.)

I could not agree more.

It has become apparent that a rising tide does not in fact lift all boats.

Both of our countries have seen impressive economic growth rates, increased productivity and investment flows. Yet, in the United States, Mexico and Canada, income inequality has grown dramatically in the almost fifteen years since NAFTA took effect. The very wealthy have reaped most of the benefits of increased trade and investment, while ordinary people have watched high-quality manufacturing jobs move elsewhere. There is a growing gap between the rich and the rest of the people.

In Canada, this prosperity gap has reached crisis proportions. Despite the fact that most Canadians are working longer hours, 80% of families lost ground or stagnated in both earnings and after-tax returns compared to the previous generation. Real wages have not increased in more than 30 years. The share of corporate profits in our economy is at its highest point since 1961, yet the corporate contribution to the public purse is declining.

In Canada, we have had ten budget surpluses in the last decade, and yet most Canadians believe they are a mere paycheque away from poverty. Eighty per cent of Canadians think the government should intervene to close the gap between the income groups. But successive Canadian federal governments have failed to deliver policies that will turn this growing disparity around. While aboriginal peoples, single mothers and recent immigrants are the most disadvantaged groups, the middle class is also losing out.

The United States and Mexico face similar challenges, albeit in quite different contexts. In your own country, the erosion of social security, the plight of the uninsured in health, the strength of powerful business lobbies in Washington and the shocking poverty of the working poor in African-American and Hispanic populations, are realities you are intimately acquainted with. Your commitment to resolving these issues explains the excitement your campaign has generated across the country. In Mexico, despite constitutional guarantees, the majority of people – including many migrant, self-employed, informal sector workers and the unemployed – have no social assistance whatsoever. The crisis in the rural sector with the most recent phase-out of agricultural tariffs will throw millions more into extreme poverty.

This growing inequality has become institutionalized through NAFTA and will become even more entrenched through the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). These agreements have provoked a chill on government regulation of the economy, as international trade rules override domestic rights. Regulatory harmonization has trumped social harmony. The provisions of Chapter 11 have unduly emphasized corporate rights at the expense of our governments’ capacity to regulate in the public interest. This is sometimes correctly referred to as a democratic deficit.

The New Democratic Party has noted for over a decade the inadequacies of our free trade agreements that do not offer sufficient protection for workers, for the environment, or indeed for the capacity of governments to regulate in the public interest. We have also expressed grave concerns about the dispute settlement process, for both its procedures and the non-respect of decisions rendered – as in the case of the softwood lumber dispute between our two countries.

NAFTA, with all its weaknesses, was the first trade agreement to incorporate side agreements on labour and environmental protection. As you have noted, such side deals are not enough. While they provide documentation on the growing problems in these areas and create forums for trilateral cooperation, they do not have the authority to impose sanctions for violations of the rules or to put in place common solutions. The promised leveling up of environmental and social standards has simply not happened.

On behalf of the New Democratic Party of Canada, our caucus and our membership, I warmly welcome your commitment to rethink NAFTA. Everyday Canadians, Americans and Mexicans are ready for such leadership. Leadership that is ready to tackle complex problems with forward-looking solutions. Our two countries are trading nations, close neighbours and culturally and historically related in many ways. I look forward to strengthening these ties in a way that respects the sovereignty of each of our countries and ensures that we are each democratically accountable to our own people. Together, we can prudently lay the groundwork to craft trade agreements which will lead to improvements for the vast majority who have been left behind since NAFTA came into effect in 1994.

The Democrats in the U.S. can count New Democrats in Canada as allies in the vital effort to improve upon NAFTA and help build a modern 21st century North American economy that is prosperous, fair and sustainable for today’s families and future generations.

Sincerely yours,
Jack Layton, P.C., M.P., Ph.D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Treasonous to both Canadian and American citizens.
We didn't vote for NAFTA or combining our two countries. The British royals would be in America once again.

Canadians have no freedom of speech from what I understand. It is after all a Common Wealth country.

New Democrats are globalists in Canada just like America it seems. You don't want to vote Conservative (Republicans here) but vote Liberal (our Democrats). It seems they have become the same New Democrats in both countries...supporting globalism and world government by the few elite.

Did we vote for that? I know they just ignore us but we can't put up with their treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dont be so sure.
Last I heard, Bill Clinton (along with Bush 1 and 2) is a big fan of the "one world government" BS. And if I remember correctly, it would begin with a North American Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That I already know
but we didn't discuss or approve it (they smoke screened it with Monica and Linda Tripp (me up). Most Americans don't support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Canadians have no freedom of speech from what I understand. It is after all a Common Wealth country
you understood wrong..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I read that from a post by a citizen of Canada.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 06:37 PM by mac2
I'll see if I can find out again.

This might be what he is taking about...freedom of speech taken away a little at a time.

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/bernstein200312020910.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. The crisis in the rural sector with the most recent phase-out of agricultural tariffs will throw mil
... will throw millions more into extreme poverty.

There's the heartbreak as super-American-agribusiness has overrun Mexico with cheap, subsidized corn. Then, in 2007, the price of food has begun to climb all around the world.

Mexican farmers have lost their livelihoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. The NDP are Democratic Socialists...
...and also the most pro-Canadian party in Parliament, and by pro-Canadian I mena trying to make sure Canada does not become the 51st state.

As for freedom of speech, The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms is a beautiful document, ensuring the right to free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. That defines the problem with NAFTA to a T.
This needs not to sink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC