Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times "A.P. Delegate Projections" numbers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:12 PM
Original message
NY Times "A.P. Delegate Projections" numbers
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 12:31 PM by uppityperson
http://www.nytimes.com/

A.P. DELEGATE PROJECTIONS
2,025 needed

Delegates:
Barack Obama : (Won on Mar. 4) 88 ... (Won to date) 1,275 ... (Super-delegates) 202 ... (Total) 1,477
Hillary Rodham Clinton : (Won on Mar. 4) 115 ...(Won to date) 1,150 ...(Super-delegates) 241 ... (Total) ... 1,391


Re-edited to say I am not staunchly supporting either, just giving info I found since I didn't find it easily elsewhere. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Popular vote count to date:

(*Obama Not on Michigan Ballot; Iowa, Nevada, Washington & Maine Have Not Released Popular Vote Totals)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks. Pop vote is interesting since it looks like this will go to convention.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 12:21 PM by uppityperson
And it is good to see how people are voting, even if only delegates matter at this point. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Obama will have the popular vote,
and the Delagates.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. 115-88 is wrong.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 12:26 PM by RUMMYisFROSTED
From the details jump:


March 4
Ohio 66 75 0 0 +Details -
Rhode Island 8 13 0 0 +Details -
Texas 61 65 0 0 +Details -
Vermont 9 6 0 0 +Details -
http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/delegates/index.html


159 Clinton
144 Obama

And that number is probably wrong, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I just copy/pasted from NYT. Have you other numbers?
Other info? I'm interested in numbers this morning. Thanks.

(I am not a staunch supporter of either)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Just pasted the details into the post w/ link.
Took me a minute to do math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I tried clicking on "details" but none show up. Projected vs what they have so far?
Just reporting what they say, thanks for that info, will keep watching. It is close, any way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. 27 vs 15. Almost a 100% difference.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 12:33 PM by RUMMYisFROSTED
By my best guess, HRC will win a single digit delegate advantage. Most likely 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. How many delegates are left?
And what are the odd given that both remain in the race that either one can actually get the nomination before the convention?

Think statistically not if one were to win all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Statistically? Odds? No predictions from me. Another webpage for you...
http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/delegates/index.html
My math says 611 left, taken from the above page.

March 8 Wyoming 12
March 11 Mississippi 33
April 22 Pennsylvania 158
May 3 Guam 4
May 6 Indiana 72
North Carolina 115
May 13 West Virginia 28
May 20 Kentucky 51
Oregon 52
June 3 Montana 16
South Dakota 15
June 7 Puerto Rico 55
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is not a final tally. The Texas Caucus is still being counted
We don't even have a winner yet and at CNN the count registered at 36% with Obama ahead. Remember that will account for 1/3 of the total Texas delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hence "Projections"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Wrong..they are not factoring that into the projections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Huh? AP Projections aren't factoring what into projections?
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 12:33 PM by uppityperson
Do you mean TX isn't in the projections yet since they are still counting? Got it. These numbers will and are changing as all the votes get counted. They are not a final tally, but projections based on what is known and will change. Not set in stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. They are factoring in the primary results but not the caucus results
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 12:33 PM by jzodda
so those projections are accurate but leave out 1/3 of the Texas delegates which is still outstanding and still being counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Perhaps they would be more accurate saying "as of now, stand by for updates"
I think most people want to know the final result, but posted this info based on whatever has happened and things are still happening to change the numbers. Good thought to not take this as "this is HOW it is", but an ongoing process. As I take "projected" since I don't trust the numbers until all the votes are counted, and even then doubt them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I'm with you
I don't trust the numbers till they are all counted. It seems every network seems to have different projections as well. What a mess :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. And 58 delegates at stake in WY and Mississippi within the week
Obama will win the lions share of both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. This page lays it all out pretty clearly
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/03/ohio-texas-vermont-and-rhode-island.html

It shows the delegate allocations from last night by state, as well as how many are still to be allocated, total delegate counts, super-delegate counts, and number of delegates still needed for each candidate.

Check it out, if you want numbers it's a good source.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thank you for that page.
Will check back later tonight, maybe tomorrow, see what happens by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC