|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:04 PM Original message |
A good reason for going left in the VP choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cjbuchanan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Unless they assassinate both of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not true, Gore was more liberal than Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Max |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 12:48 AM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Max Cleland would be the VP pick if he had won re-election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. This is the most rediculous statement, sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mobuto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. No, the conspiracy targeted James A. Garfield. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Layman (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 09:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. What exactly does,"Kennedy was basically a centrist' mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Layman (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 10:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. What exactly does,"Kennedy was basically a centrist' mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. I agree that Kerry needs a progressive VP for a number of reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wasichu (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Right. Also who would we want to take over if something happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'm not convinced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. McKinley was a Republican. The Republicans weren't behind it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Lincoln was a Republican as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
9. You're assuming that a ticket with two liberals can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
13. Would Kucinich give us Ohio? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 08:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. it could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 12:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Honestly, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Classical_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-09-04 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
16. Deleted message |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC