Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

COLUMN: Clinton Should Follow Romney, Edwards Out Of The Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:55 PM
Original message
COLUMN: Clinton Should Follow Romney, Edwards Out Of The Race
Even Mitt Romney knew.

The man who would say anything (see "double Guantanamo") realized it was best to say no more. His continued presence, he realized, would do nothing but hinder the transition of opponent John McCain into the Republican presidential nomination.

And now And now Hillary Clinton stands confronted with a similar predicament: How does she face admitting that the campaign to which she has dedicated her past year, the campaign that she was probably told she would easily win, is now merely a faded pipe dream?

Romney, for all the horrors born of his campaign, handled the decision with grace. John Edwards also chose to bow out and let his issues live on - which they have - rather than play the role of kingmaker at the Democratic National Convention.

Clinton cannot win the nomination through pledged delegates - the ones selected by the people - and would need a radical shift in support among unpledged delegates, coinciding with the seating of delegates from the unsanctioned primaries in Michigan and Florida, in order to win. To be blunt, she can only win if the process were to somehow overturn the will of the people.

Certainly supporters and her own feelings will tell her she can go on after her wins in Ohio and Texas. And she has every right to go on if she desires and thinks it best. But her internal drive and persistent campaigning will undeniably cloud her reasoning in this decision, especially following the euphoria of acceptance she experienced in Texas and Ohio last week.

It's hard not to consider the thought process going through her mind. In any other year, Clinton would almost certainly have been the nominee. She had the name recognition, the political machine and an increased Clinton nostalgia to go against the Bush fatigue.

But something happened along the way she hadn't prepared for, something that shattered her cloak of invincibility: a fresh face emerged, offering not only divergence from the current administration but also a step forward from the unproductive squabbling and fear-mongering of the past.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/13/politics/uwire/main3937379.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. It just isn't going to happen..she has too much to gain by staying in the race
as does the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. She Has Absolutely Nothing To Gain - The Country Only Gains McSame By Her Continuing Her Losing Bid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. she has too much to gain by staying in the race
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 03:02 PM by DJ13
She's damaging both her own reputation as well as Bill's.

A new poll was released yesterday that showed that for the first time since the early 90's Bill has higher negative numbers than his positive numbers with rank and file Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The country has NOTHING to gain from a president who sides with Closed Government
and protecting the secrecy and privilege of the powerful elite.

What was the LONGTERM effect and the very costly consequences of putting in a closed government Democrat in the 90s?



http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Neither Romney nor Edwards had the massive Clinton ego of inevitability
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 02:58 PM by DJ13
That ego has blinded her and her followers to the reality she has near zero chance left to win outside of trying to destroy the party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree, and she should apologize - ON TEEVEE!
Saying she is sorry "if they were offended" ain't an apology!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinsb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. the CBC
Having moved to Canada I truly appreciate the CBC. I listened to CBC radio alot in the states, but now that I've moved here I get CBC newsworld (24 hr news network). CBC news tends to be very objective and neutral about US politics - especially internal politics. For example: the CBC had extensive coverage on the leadup to Iraq and the general consensus amoung the many experts they brought in was that there were not WMD's in Iraq, No ties to terrorism etc.,

On the political campaign coverage (and remember they have no horse in this race) Clinton looks bad - desperate and unwilling to admit it's over: But according to their experts and analysis it is very much over and Hillary's campaign is (in a financial sense) running on fumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's wait a while and see how Obama handles the racist Church he belongs to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think he needs to be more concerned about so-called Democrats attempting to stir up race hatred
Tell me, how can an ENTIRE CHURCH be racist? How exactly does that work? Is the building racist? Is every member of the congregation racist?

Or is it just the scary black man in the pulpit? You know -- the one speaking the ABSOLUTE FUCKING TRUTH about how this country deals with people of color.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Oh, wait to see if a swiftboat attack works?

Because that's the only way she can win. Pretty pathetic. I think the author of
this article is right on. She wasn't prepared to lose and cannot accept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Inconvenient truths about the New Democrats, the Third Way, Democratic Leadership Council, etc."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC