Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huffington Post: Florida Suggests Half Vote Solution To Settle Democratic Party Squabble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:01 PM
Original message
Huffington Post: Florida Suggests Half Vote Solution To Settle Democratic Party Squabble

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-levitt/florida-suggests-half-vot_b_91752.html

Posted March 16, 2008 | 12:28 PM (EST)

Appealing for Solomon-like decision making, Florida's Democratic leadership is asking that 50 percent of its elected delegate strength be seated as a means of breaking the impasse and saving millions of dollars in a re-vote which has little support from both the Clinton and Obama campaigns.

The newest face-saving proposal was sent by "over-the-weekend mail" to the Democratic National Committee as a way out of the dilemma facing the party caused when Florida held a rules-breaking election one week ahead of schedule.

Indications are that Sen. Hillary Clinton - who won the Jan. 29 Florida primary - would agree to the "50 percent proposal", but spokespersons for Sen. Barack Obama still are asking for a caucus.

"When a 'Violation of Timing' occurs by a state party, the number of pledged delegates shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%)," veteran DNC member Jon Ausman of Tallahassee reminded the party's Credential Committee in an appeal by mail. He explained Florida could still get 210 delegates but each would only get l/2 of a vote. He also asked that Florida's elected officials - superdelegates - be seated.

"I am respectfully requesting that these two challenges and/or appeals regarding Florida's delegates and alternates be scheduled before the next Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting for consideration and review," Ausman said, apparently with the backing of a number of Sunshine State officials. A spokesman for Sen. Bill Nelson, the state's leading Democrat called the 1⁄2 vote suggestion..."an idea...not necessarily a proposal."

The documents were sent by Ausman to the co-Chairman of the Credentials Committee James Roosevelt, with e-mails explaining the appeal being forwarded to Democratic leaders all over the State. Ausman and Janee Murphy, Secretary of theFlorida Democratic Party, said they expected to go before the Committee at its meeting on April 14.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. How will the popular vote be counted, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Superdelegates should only get half a vote also. They are the ones that screwed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Half it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Super delegates shouldn't get any vote
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:36 PM by OhioBlue
as you said, they are the ones that screwed it up.

I could understand seating FL at 50%, but I would not understand giving the supers a vote. FL went against party rules. The FL party leaders should be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I hate that they give themselves a full vote and split the voters delegates.
But I know they wont agree to not getting their full votes so I guess that is necessary for any deal. Jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. I agree. NO vote for the stinky supers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Delegates are what matter.
The "popular vote" isn't a formal measure used for anything in particular. It's more of a talking point than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Count the popular vote in full -- It won't make a difference
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:38 PM by Drachasor
Obama is still going to win the Popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Exactly. Both need superdelegates to win. I don't see why they shouldn't be seated.
It's assinine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Doesn't matter. It's about the delegates. Always has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. There is no official popular vote count
That's just something RealClearPolitics computes for interest. There is no Democratic Party certification of a national popular vote or anything. Some superdelegates might use it as a guide, but they will decide for themselves how to factor in Michigan and Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. If we can have half the Chimp vote back...
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Florida will never give up.
They will pout and whine and cry and stamp their feet.

:nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. 3/5 would be more ironic. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Split it 50 Clinton/50 Obama - no Supers, and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. that sounds like a fair compromise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. What's the difference between doing that and not seating them at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. They get delegates at the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. This is a political party, not a travel agency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. .
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 06:04 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. So what? The delegates don't represent anything
If they simply split the delegates 50/50, the delegates don't represent the voters and make no real difference to the counts anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. why Obama only got 36% in Fl...why should he get 50%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. 1/2 the number of dels he would have gotten, or half of the pop. that voted for him.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 06:25 PM by annie1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. but "half the pop" did NOT vote for him....36% did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. he would still get 36%. so if they formerly had 200 dels, he would get 36% of 100 dels instead of...
36% of 200.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. oh sorry, i though you were referring to the original post, not the...
50/50 obama/clinton split. what a corny idea. i agree with you, sorry i misread what you were responding to. :D. Apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. And Clinton campaigned there the night before, against the rules.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
41. Bullshit. They're already halfing the number of delegates; they
should at least reflect who won this primary, and the percentages of the candidates should be followed. I believe it was the FL Dem Party that were the culprits and I don't remember how many super delegates FL has and who they are. Could someone list them.

Hillary won these votes fair and square, and I really believe they should be seated as the vote indicates. I still believe that the FL dem party should pay a fine for disobeying party rules, and the voters should not be punished for something they couldn't help.

I hope the Convention will address some of these problems, such as why three small states should be representative of the whole country, and the problem of manipulation of our primary vote for nefarious purposes because of open caucuses and primaries, and on and on and on. I sure there are many more problems that need attention, like a refusal of the democrats to participate in elections that use electron voting machines and central tabulators, for one instance.

We have so much to discuss and the FL and MI votes are only one of those.

If you Obama supporters are so certain of your plethora of votes, delegates and super delegates, why are you so worried about Hillary getting the votes she earned in FL and MI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rules are rules...
An Obama win in Virginia & Nevada will negate anything that happens in Florida, and he'll win Michigan regardless..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. This may be the best solution.
I don't like it, but it may be the only option for FL. However, I don't think that the FL superdelegates should get a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thats not a good solution, but if the SD's arent allowed to vote it would be OK
It still gives Clinton more than she deserves, but if the Florida super delegates (the same people responsible for this mess) arent allowed to count it would be a reasonable compromise.

One thing that we all need to consider is that the Clinton campaign is now trying to say the national total votes "express the will of the people", so she's no longer concerned about the actual pledged delegates she moght get from Florida, she wants the Florida vote count to be rolled into her national total so she can try to convince the SD's at the convention that she's deserving of the nomination.

I dont believe the Florida vote totals should be included by the DNC, as part of the punishment for moving their primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Superdelegates are going to consider FL and MI regardless as to their seating status.
In fact, if Obama fights to not allow them to be seated in one form or another that will be another consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gear_head Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. does Obama have the votes, in the eventuality of a floor fight...
at the national convention,
to evict these Florida delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. There were no delegates to begin with. FL was sanctioned.
So why all of a sudden are they there? Why now are we taking Bill Nelson's suggestion...he's a Clinton superdelegate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. The existing vote cannot be the basis of anything... that's just nuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. fuck that....my family members are WHOLE people why should they be made half of a person?
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 06:24 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Have them call their DEMOCRATIC legislators who made this happen.
If we allow FL and MI to get away with breaking the rules, what's to stop everybody from completely disregarding the process?

Remember, primary voting isn't a national election/representation issue. It's a poll completely governed by the RNC or DNC. There are no such things as "voter's rights" in a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. When your family members break the Democratic party rules
then they should suffer the consequences too.Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. This a fairly reasonable compromise
The DNC has called FL's bluff and Florida has basically admitted it has a weak hand. So now it's down to a question of whether it's fair to Clinton and Obama. Now, clinton had big name recognition, and it didn't hurt that she jetted into Florida on the monday before the vote, even though it was for a private event rather than a rally - she still got some free local press coverage and sent a message to voters.

On the other hand, Obama can afford to lose a few delegates, and realistically a good many of the Edwards delegates from FL would switch their vote to him, if Iowa is any guide. With the state delegates reduced to 1/2 votes as a compromise, Clinton probably nets only 10-15 delegates. I'd say it might be a good idea for Obama to be gracious and give her the freebie in order to put it behind them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
40. PLAGERISM... I suggested this 4-5 days ago.but I think SDs should be 1/2 also
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 09:13 PM by Johnny__Motown
and I suggested the same for Michigan too, although we/they may re-vote in MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, they should re-vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. I say let's do it, and quickly. This makes us look pathetic.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
43. That's what I would've done in the first place if I were Dean
There had to be a punishment or the DNC would have no credibility and every state could move their primary up to August of 2007 if they wanted. On the other hand, completely invalidating Michigan and Florida's delegates has been problematic.

The Republicans did this and it worked out well for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. Why are so many thinking that is fair? They had no delegates.
They still don't have any delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC