Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton: "We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:41 AM
Original message
Clinton: "We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates"

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1725514,00.html

Exclusive: Clinton Vows to Push On
Wednesday, Mar. 26, 2008 By MARK HALPERIN

<snip>

Last question Senator. Some people look at the current state of the delegate counts and say the only way you can win the nomination is at the convention, with a convention where delegates move around perhaps, and you'll make your case side by side. Are you comfortable if that's the way you win the nomination, going all the way to Denver and winning it there? Is that a comfortable outcome for you?

You know it's the same thing for Senator Obama. Neither of us will reach the number of delegates needed. So I think that that is, you know, the reality for both of our campaigns. And all delegates have to assess who they think will be the strongest nominee against McCain and who they believe would do the best job in bringing along the down-ballot races and who they think would be the best President. And, from my perspective, those are all very legitimate questions, and as you know so well, Mark, every delegate with very few exceptions is free to make up his or her mind however they choose. We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates, but every delegate is expected to exercise independent judgment. And, you know, I'm just going to do the best I can in the next 10 contests to make my case to the voters in those elections and then we'll see where we are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. When Obama's sworn in on inauguration day she'll STILL be thinking she can win n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "Once those returns come in from Guam I am IN LIKE FLYNN, BABY!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. She is very much part of the old energies
and they will hang on as long as there is a gasp left in their old tired partial lung.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemzRock Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I should save these posts. In ten years, if BO is successful, someone will
be saying the same thing about BO. Calling him an "old energy."

Why is Obama's group blocking Candidate X? They are such blankity blanks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Do you have a point?
Are we talking about ten years hence? Not that I noticed.

For NOW, Obama represents the New Energy for our world. Clinton is very much old energy, which also creates a drag on the new for a bit. It's a birthing process. The evolution process will still be in effect in ten years, as far as we know. So, yeah, duh, anything out of date will be so. No one can predict who that will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Only if Michelle Obama is grappling for the presidency
Because in ten years Barack will have been out of office for two years and his VP will be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. She'll hold a separate inauguration: 'President-in-Exile of the States That Really Matter'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. "So-called pledged delegates"?
Could she be any more transparent?

How would she feel if she was ahead and Obama was trying to poach pledged delegates from her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has Hillary thought through the "Day After"?
If she should prevail through any of the machinations she and her campaign have proposed, via superdelegates, browbeaten pledged delegates, or projected electoral votes, what will the Day After look like for our party? How will disenfranchised Obama voters and African-AMerican Democrats feel about the Democratic Party gifting the nomination to Hillary though she lost the popular and delegate votes. Has she thought it through? Does she really win that way? Does she want to?

She needs a long weekend off the camapgn trail to think this through.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Hillary willing to lose to an older man (McCain) but not to a younger Obama
means to her, attaining the Office is more important than ANYTHING. She knows if she loses the nomination, but if she bloodies the nominee enough to lose the GE, she gets a chance to pull all this crap AGAIN in 4 years, IF there is anything left of the party by then.

She is willing to sacrifice the best interests of party, people, the nation so she gets another crack at running for president should she not get this one.

THAT sort of driving ambition indicates something very tragic about her values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. sounding more like george W who-cares-what- you-think bush to me all the time
Instead of winning votes on issues and leadership, HRC campaign wants to change rules and/or skate around them.

Memo to Team Clinton: America is sick and tired of that lame assed substitute for ethics and leadership.

ENOUGH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. The so-called voters are paying attention to this nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's time the media picked up on this bizarre contradiction...
Voters voice not being heard in Michigan and Florda=Disenfranchisement.

Convincing pledged delegates (who represent the voters voice across the country) to go against their constituent's wishes=Fair Game.

Media? Hello? Anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. The rules of the party will guide delegate selection, and
the rules are that pledged delegates that change their vote. You gotta live it. It is the same for both candidates. I'm sure some delegates will change their Clinton vote for Obama also. Circumstances in each state differ, and the pledged delegates can vote their choice. Party Rules state this, not me. Donna Brazille was explaining this to Wolf Blitzer on CNN yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. You don't count...
is essentially what the Clintons are saying to millions and millions of voters in many states, not just the few big states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Actually, FL and MI should count. The rest of us can go screw.
Logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. You know, I'm starting to, you know, get to the point where, you know,
I can, you know, no longer stand her.

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. And this is why we're seeing so many useless national polls.
Don't believe ANY of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_brand Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Screw the voters, it's about who's the strongest nominee agaisnt McCain...
In Hillary's opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Once again, the Clinton's try to disenfranchise voters.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Let's just hope she is as forgiving...
When/If I decide to change my support from Sen Clinton to Sen Obama..

The way things are going, I am just about there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC