Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joining the Conspiracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:06 PM
Original message
Joining the Conspiracy
Comments at the link are interesting, too...

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/03/26/joining-the-conspiracy.aspx

Joining the Conspiracy

Anyone reading this blog is presumably aware that, over the past several weeks, Hillary Clinton has gone out of her way to repeatedly compliment John McCain at Barack Obama's expense.

But consider a few other data points:

1) Matt Drudge hyped a photo of Obama in Somali garb that he claimed (and the Clinton campaign declined to deny) Clinton staffers had been circulating.

2) Bill Clinton went on the Rush Limbaugh show on the day of the Texas primary--after Limbaugh had spent days urging GOP voters in the state to cross over and vote for Clinton in order "rig" the election and ensure that Democrats nominated the weaker of their two candidates.

3) The Clinton campaign has been circulating an article in The American Spectator alleging that an Obama adviser, former Air Force chief Merrill McPeak, is an anti-semite and a drunk.

4) When Clinton attacked Obama on Jeremiah Wright yesterday, she did it at an editorial meeting of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the vanity publication of Richard Mellon Scaife, while sitting next to Scaife himself.

Drudge. Limbaugh. The American Spectator. Richard Mellon Scaife. What exactly is it going to take before Clinton campaign staffers recognize that they are, in essence, now working for the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy?

--Christopher Orr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. The powers that be in staff realize and want to profit from it. K & R..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. these are bullshit charges
. . . and yet another boring, biased article which doesn't bother to prove it's lurid charges. A good example for what passes as truth from the Obama camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Just curious
Which one of those things didn't happen?

The author takes a few factually verifiable events, and makes a conclusion based on them.

"A good example for what passes as truth from the Obama camp."

Disprove the premise, and you disprove the conclusion. Get started on showing how those facts are not facts, and you win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. #3 isn't accurate -- Edit I meant #2
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 01:36 PM by Drachasor
Clinton was on another show, and his interview was aired during the Limbaugh time-slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Read this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I meant #2
My mistake would have been clear if you read the content of my post, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. OK. See response #28. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. That guest host has his own show, Bill was on that
Then the interviewed was re-aired.
http://www.wbap.com/Article.asp?id=606119&spid=6051

Notice the time when the interview was done (last update). It was well before Limbaugh's show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Spin it any way you want, but it was Rush's show and Mark Davis
was sitting in for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I'm not spinning it. Clinton never agreed to go on Limbaugh
I've been a consistent Obama supporter on these boards, and I despise the tactics Hillary and her campaign have used. That said, I don't think this point is a fair bit of criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Everything in the OP has already...
been on the news, repeatedly. Are "lurid charges" always false? Don't think so. BTW, the article isn't from "the Obama camp," and you know it. Quit sniping.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. quit the bullshit attacks and I'll quit defending my candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. No defense for your original 'lurid' assertion, seems like. Be my
guest, defend your candidate, but this is indefensible, as you just proved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. My opinion doesn't have to be justified to you. It stands. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Translation: "I won't let the facts get in the way of my opinions"....
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I fail to see any bullshit attacks in my post...
Quit sniping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. She wasn't referring to your post but to the other one
BablyonSister can speak for herself, but if you look at the "reply to post #", her reply was to someone else's post.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. OK.
But as you can see, I was responding to bigtree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Huh?!
1,2,& 4 have been discussed extensively with photographic evidence and comments from the Clinton campaign. I was not aware of 3) until just now. If you follow the link, you'll see that the blog is sourced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. bullshit. The spin is incredible here. These are NOT proven. Not as expressed.
This is just another biased attack on Clinton from an Obama supporter. Posted here as yet another factless attack by an Obama supporter. I think the article is bullshit. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. "factless"...
"We came in under sniper fire..."

Now THAT'S factless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Okay, I'm curious... if the 4 points are inaccurate "AS EXPRESSED" as you say
how would you express each of them in a way that you would consider to be accurate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. just wallow in it. I won't waste my time explaining ANYTHING to folks posting these lurid attacks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Translation: "I can't refute the charges."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Translation: I'm not wasting my time.
deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. I wasn't asking for them
I wasn't involved in posting "lurid" attacks. I'm sincerely interested in how you view those 4 points and how, to you, they could be expressed "accurately".

But hey... if you'd rather not or can't say... it's your prerogative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. "I think the article is bullshit. Deal with it."
I feel increasingly the same way about your posts. It's rather sad that you can feel as strongly as you do and not offer one piece of information to support it. Why do you bother responding? Has your ego grown so that you think that we just want to know that you disagree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. But "Obama Is The Antichrist!"...
Or so I'm told...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think a number of DU'ers have been wondering out loud lately if the Clinton's...
are really Republicans and not Democrats at all. I think we have been hood winked by these people for a very long time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. But Nafta was meant for the workers right?
Well even if you disagree about Nafta, surely you can agree that going after the "welfare queens" is good for Murika? :sarcasm:

They are DLC Oligarchists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Once you realize that Whitewater was a dog and pony show used to get INTO Rosw Law Firm and scrub
the files clean for Jackson Stephens, the firm's largest client, the longtime friend of GHWBush who helped him bring BCCI into this country, and the same man who bankrolled the Clintons' careers and underwrote Bill's primary campaign, it stops being a mystery.

Gee - would Clintons take the heat and protect BushInc and its players in exchange for the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R, at this point I don't put it past them...the enemy of my enemy is my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R. I was just going to post this one myself, babylonsister. Thank you.
It really is an eye-opener!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. The photo Drudge published
was published weeks earlier in a right wing national newspaper, and it was discussed in hundreds of posts at Free Republic days before Drudge published it, with some posters there writing "we have to get this to Rush Hannity and Drudge". Clinton said she had no knowledge of staffers passing on that photo, but Drudge never even claimed it was given to him by Clinton staff. All he claimed is that it was "obtained" from an email some Clinton staffers shared between each other. "Obtained" frequently means unauthorized possession, as in stolen in some way. That email was reported as private speculation about if that photo would cause Obama damage, which is what hundreds of Free Republic users had been openly speculating about in public. It was a duel Drudge hit against both Clinton and Obama to release it the way he did, because he knew Obama supporters would go ape shit about any Clinton connection and as a result that photo would get picked up and carried everywhere in light of the new political controversy everyone started to talk about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Point being- she's on record as using Drudge. So even if THAT case wasn't accurate, she HAS
engaged in that behavior- using Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. if any Clinton supporters don't know the deep significance of this:
"..she did it at an editorial meeting of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the vanity publication of Richard Mellon Scaife, while sitting next to Scaife himself."

then they are following someone, buying into someone, that they no very little about...historical facts versus assumptions....

see what the P T-R's editorial view of Bill and Hillary was in the '90s....

the 'vast right wing conspiracy' that Hillary espoused as being the root cause of all of the Clinton White House problems....DID EXIST....

and Richard Mellon Scaife was one of the leaders of it, financially and directly..

the Clinton campaign is so desperate...to lie with those who tried to destroy them in the '90s.....

Hillary has no truth, and now she has no shame...

...just blind ambition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. The Obama camp has no shame in their desperate attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. Translation: "I have no answer as to why Hillary would agree to talk to Scaife".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Somehow I missed #4. Interesting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. you took the dive......






and it's time to flush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bill Clinton appeared on Rush Limbaugh?
Wow. What was their explanation for that?

Are they hoping to appeal to Republican voters, or are they pushing for a McCain victory so Hillary can run again in 2012?

Either way, how do I look? :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yes, the day of the TX/OH primaries. Here's a link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Thanks! Boy, this should be interesting... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. No he didn't
Babylonsister is repeating a proven lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. And are you being a tad bit disingenuous, MF?
I'll give you Rush Limbaugh wasn't the interviewer, but it was the The Rush Limbaugh Show:


Bill Clinton on Rush Limbaugh Show Day of Texas PrimaryEIB Guest Host While Rush Is "Sick" 3/4/2008 Mark Davis of WBAP Dallas/Ft. Worth (from the link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. It was an interview conducted
on ANOTHER show that morning.

It was replayed on the Rush limbaugh show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Well from the snip I included,
it's easy to see why there might be a misunderstanding. Why didn't you clarify that instead of just calling her a liar?

I understand your point now, although I think it's splitting hairs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. because she KNOWS the circumstances
and still tells this untruth. That's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. but...but...but...
If you'd just have clarified -- like you did for me, it would have been so much more helpful. And NICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. I understand what you're saying.
You're not aware that this was "clarified" over a week ago, and many times since then. There have been at least five threads on it where it was debunked, and the people who continue to spread this tale were active in those threads.

They know exactly what happened, and they persist in telling an untruth. They're liars. I don't know any better way to describe them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
45. Don't forget with the Clinton campaign embraced and readily accepted a debate on Faux...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/05/clinton-accepts-fox-news-_n_85111.html

And remember when she wanted to have a debate every week until March 4 after Super Tuesday to get free advertising for her cash-starved campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
46. Rec'd for Hillary's "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
47. Bill Clinton didn't go on Rush Limbaugh's show
and you knowingly spread that lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. MF, look at my above post -- #49.
I don't understand why you're saying he didn't go on Rush Limbaugh's show. Is the snip I posted incorrect?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
54. Speaking about fox..what did Hillary say on her interview tonight?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. You've got to see it. I was in shock
even after her behavior these past few days. She took it to an entirely new level tonight. She blamed Obama for Michigan and Florida too. Said Obama is the only thing standing in the way of re-votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Did she bring up Wright again?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
59. Hillary's NEW Friends and what they did to the Clintons
Well, some of the things they did....


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Vince_Foster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
60. Kick
Google Hillary neocon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC