Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is why Obama is not worried about losing the nomination to HRC - The Fix is in.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:34 PM
Original message
This is why Obama is not worried about losing the nomination to HRC - The Fix is in.
Thank you Howard Dean, for showing us again what real leadership looks like.

************
April 03, 2008
Democrats: The Fix Is On
By Donald Lambro

Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean has a plan that will produce a nominee before his party's convention in August, avoiding what he fears could be a "really ugly and nasty" fiasco.

~snip~

Mr. Dean, whose polls show the party's internecine warfare is hurting its chances in November, has been talking to party bigwigs about a deal and now says the delegations will be seated before the nominating roll of the states is called.

The conventional wisdom says the battle between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton will go all the way to the convention. But Mr. Dean wants it over well before that, and possibly before the last of the 10 remaining primaries are completed in June. And it is likely that will happen.

~snip~

Mr. Dean's stern admonition to both candidates to stop the attacks on one another, telling their supporters to "keep their mouths shut," got lots of media attention. His plan to bring the nominating fight to an end, possibly before June, got little notice.

That plan calls on the remaining 350 or so undeclared superdelegates to break their neutrality sooner rather than later, providing enough votes to produce the 2,024-delegate majority needed to clinch the nomination. "There is no point in waiting," Mr. Dean said, adding that he has been "talking to a fairly significant number of — by and large — nonaligned people about how we might resolve this."

Indeed, neutral superdelegates (governors, members of Congress, Democratic National Committee members and other VIPs) have begun to break their silence in the last two weeks, all breaking for Mr. Obama: New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey and this week, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar.

So far, the delegate math favors Mr. Obama. Turning the corner into this week, he had 1,631 pledged delegates to Mrs. Clinton's 1,501. Even if Mrs. Clinton were to win a majority of popular votes in most the remaining primaries, she still would not be able to pass him, because the party's proportional delegate award system effectively preserves Mr. Obama's lead.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/democrats_the_fix_is_on.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is such bullshit... makes me furious that Dean is screwing with the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Did it make you equally furious when those DLCers were screwing with the process
in FL and MI?

Just curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Get your head outta the sand and you
might calm down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He's just asking the super D's to declare sooner rather than later
It doesn't help either candidate if a nominee isn't selected until August. If the super D's are all declared by about the same time as the last primaries, we'll have a candidate and can move against McCain instead of each other.

Pretty logical move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
51. But you don't understand.
This is ALL about Hillary winning the Democratic Presidential Nomination - by whatever means necessary - as a historic stroke for women, and a "first" for which she will be remembered in history.

Performance in the GE is irrelevant. The next appointments to the Supreme Court are irrelevant. Getting our military out of Iraq and restoring America's credibility are irrelevant.

Clear now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. "bullshit"
Dean has the Democratic Party's interests in mind. He's not "screwing" with the process, he's trying to prevent damage to the party and a loss in the GE. If you were a Democrat I wouldn't have to explain that to you, but... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. why do people accuse Clinton supporters of not being democrats... stop, you still need us even if
your guy wins...

so far, because of the actions of Obama supporters, here and elsewhere, your guy can kiss my vote goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Oh, the irony!
Edited on Fri Apr-04-08 02:20 PM by BushDespiser12
:rofl: :rofl:

"How dare you accuse me of not being a Democrat" "I will not be voting for the nominee"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #30
58. I got a kick out of that one myself..
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. OMG, do you see what you wrote??
You fault me for doubting your credentials as a Democrat, and then you admit you're not going to vote for the Dem nominee if it's Obama. Way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Then you're not a democrat
If you won't support the nominee whoever it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. b/w the media BS, race-card BS and the voter fraud, he can kiss my vote good-bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. I see HRC supporters like yourself as
having devotion to a candidate that exceeds devotion to the party.

Your earlier post made that clear. Dean asks Dems to put the good of the party above the good of the candidate.

And rather than seeing that as "screwing", I see it as accepting reality.

The math is quite clear. Hillary can't win it.

Frankly, I don't care if she stays in. Let the states have their primaries - then there is no more quibbling - and the voters get to vote.


but, I do see Hillary "fanatics" as unwilling to face the data.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #29
54. So we've entered into the bartering stage of the grieving process I see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #29
56. why do we accuse you of not being democrats?! DUH--hellooo?
because YOU'RE NOT?

could anyone be any more obviously NOT a Democrat?
somehow I have a feeling you wouldn't be voting Democrat anyway--but to change your vote to "punish" supporters -- ASININE!

sheesh, get it through your thick head: Hillary Clinton is NOT going to be the nominee. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #29
60. If you are ignorant enough to base your vote on how Obama supporters
act rather Obama as a candidate then Obama does not need your vote. I won't vote for that witch because of the type of person she is. It has nothing to do with her supporters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. why didn't he step in when the media was calling the Clintons racist and every other Clinton dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. erm...
1) When was "the media" calling Clinton racist, again? Some people here may be doing that, but I haven't exactly seen that in "the media".

2) And how exactly would Dean "step in" to handle something like that? He's supposed to say "No no, stop that you bad media you"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. HELLO!!!!!! have you been living in a box?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Because asking superdelegates to decide quickly is the worst thing evah! WOOT!!!
Where did you come from? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Were you equally as furious when Hillary's big money backers
sent a letter to Nancy Pelosi, threatening to withhold funds, in order to screw with "the process"?
At this point, I am so sick of the Clintons, and her rabid supporters, I don't give a damn what you & they do.

Withholding your vote is not a threat anymore. But for the sake of your children & grandchildren, I certainly hope you won't live to regret it, while making a point. Grandpa McCain has already promised "more wars", and with the all volunteer army being FUBAR, where the hell do you think the fresh new bodies will come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
50. There's a serious lack of seeing the bigger picture going on these days.
I don't have children so I have no dog in this fight but, silly me, I care for my friends kids and my family's future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean doesn't have this kind of power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. He is speaking out....not saying he has the power. This is the Washington Times
Lambro.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. Politely asking superdelegates to decide is the type of jackbooted fascism we don't need.
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's "The fix is on" ...not the "fix is in"..
Impeachmentmonkey! :) And thanks for the linky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. The "Fix"
I understand not liking the way this is going but it's not a fix. What is he supposed to do? What are your suggestions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. If you read it closely it says "the fix is on" in the article
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 03:30 PM by zidzi
but the OP says "the fix is in" which is a whole different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. so . . what does 'the fix is on' mean? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. "on" versus "in" was indeed my gaff. Sorry for any confusion it caused.
sorry for any confusion about my intent, which is to see this as a positive,
appropriate and creative solution to the current state of polarity and growing
disunity in the Democratic Primary race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The Fix is On means Dean is working for a
viable solution in spite of boneheads like little debbie wasserman, karen finney, and the rest of the dinos.

Thanks:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I wasn't taking "fix" here as a negative. When there's a real problem, that needs a solution
the word "fix" to me isn't necessarily a negative, but can see how it might be perceived
as an insinuation that Dean's doing something inappropriate. But I thought my praise of
Dean would make my intent clear. Anway, that's just what the head line said, which I didn't
write, only copied/pasted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Go Dean! This nightmare will be over months before the convention, and Obama can then turn all
his attention on McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. I only wish. Then this hell would be over
and we could start running against McSame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dean has been saying this all over TV
Openly and clearly. It is not a "plan", it is a plea to the superdelegates to go ahead with what they are going to do.

Why quote the Washington Times and Lambro?

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1948

Here are the videos and links from his appearances...just a few of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Thanks for enlightening me & for the link.
I hadn't seen this ANYwhere -- maybe cuz I killed my TV long ago -- but thanks for letting me know. I
do frequent a number of news sites daily (RawStory, Op-Ed news, AlterNet, BuzzFlash, and RealClearPolitics.
Latter site was where I happened to see it first. And interestingly the article states this:
"Mr. Dean's stern admonition to both candidates to stop the attacks on one another, telling their supporters
to "keep their mouths shut," got lots of media attention. (Dean's) plan to bring the nominating fight to
an end, possibly before June, got little notice.


Whatever. I don't think it's a very good reason for your getting all snarky with me about my post. Whether to
call it a "plan" or call it a "plea" seems a silly reason to get one's knickers in a bunch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Well, you said the "fix was in"....Dean has been so fair that people are screaming
for his head.

I don't think any fix is in. I think it is time for Hillary to stop hurting the party or get out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. And I totally agree with you that Hillary needs to get out now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. If Hill had any class or care about the party she'd leave tomorrow...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. But WAIT! She still has a chance!!!!



Season 4 is coming soon... Just wait and see what happens!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. OT: Season 4 is tomorrow!
oh wait .. lol HRC's the companion? ack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Time machine!
Yeah, and why is everyone trying to STOP PEOPLE FROM VOTING!!!

(Hee.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. After this weekend we'll wonder why everyone isn't voting on these voting machines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm ready to start fighting McSame and not my fellow Democrats.
Let's wrap this up and get busy winning the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReverendDeuce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thank you Howard Dean for trying to save us from that harpy...
You get a big "Yeeaaah!" from me and mine here in the midwest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That was unnecessary.
"Harpy"? Come on now. We can be mature about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. I have an idea! Let's take it to the
SCOTUS! I would bet they could straighten us out in no time. They will rule for John McCain. So let us just forget about Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and cut short all the necessities of having an election. Then we could all stop worrying about Hillary Clinton being a harpy and not getting out so someone else could win. Getting out so Democrats would not have a choice. That seems to be the modus operandi of some people that want her to get out. I will vote for the nominee no matter which Democrat it is, but this crap that keeps on going on day after day ragging on one or the other is making me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PylesMalfunction Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. I really don't think there are many superdelegates...
who don't know who they're going to support. Most of them have made up their mind at this point - they just haven't declared who they're supporting because they don't want to be seen as swaying the election. I understand and respect that but the issue is that neither candidate can win without the superdelegates. They're going to be an influence no matter what so it's getting to that time where they have to start speaking up. I think we're going to see quite a few of them start to declare but especially after the PA and NC primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Because he is leading every way possible, and can not be caught
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
32. If it is perceived the "fix is in" by the hrc delegates and supporters
you can bet yo ass that obama will surely lose. I predicted he will lose if he won this straight. I could see writing in the name Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on a ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Then you would be singing
"hail to the chief" to McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
61. How is the fix in if he is telling them to tell who they will vote for in early summer instead of
August. How is that harming Hillary? All the states will have voted. She can't whine about that. Oh I get it...she wants to go to the convention to whine about the agreement she made that Florida and Michigan would not count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. I wonder how many posters in this thread actually read your article.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
46. Dean is playing with the rules to favor one candidate over the other and it is fucking BULLSHIT!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomBall Democrat Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. He's not playing with the rules -
he's simply asking the delegates.

much like HRC asks the delegates and superdelegates to disregard to will of the people who elected them.

As Obama has pointed out to HRC, you can't have it both ways.

If it's wrong for Dean, it's wrong for her.

Profanity doesn't change facts, BTW.

It just offends - that's all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-04-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
48. The only "fix" I want to see is a brokered convention and
a nominee that is neither Clinton nor Obama.

Then "fix" the corrupt primary process before another primary season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayFredMuggs Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. SO you want a Democratic candidate in the General that...
Edited on Sat Apr-05-08 07:29 AM by JayFredMuggs
No one voted for, volunteered for, nor gave money to in the Primaries?

How "Democratic" is THAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #53
63. Just as Democratic as a primary
that allows big money donors and the mainstream media to narrow the choices; just as Democratic as a primary that narrows the field down to two corporatist/centrist/3rd way/"new dem" candidates before the majority ever get to vote.

Gore is the obvious choice, and the name under current speculation. He won a primary, and a general election, already, but we didn't get to see him seated as President. The nomination of Gore would be a fitting end to the Bush administration, imo.

The selection of Kerry, while not as favorable as Gore, would also be appropriate.

For that matter, Edwards, who had a large body of support in THIS primary, should be in contention.

There were exactly 2 caucuses and 2 primaries (not counting Florida and Michigan, which can't count anyway,) before the field was narrowed to Clinton and Obama. From that point on, I don't consider any of the results to be authentic. Choosing sides based on who one hates most, or dislikes least, is no way to pick a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
52. I think after PA this will be over
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
55. I heard Dean talk about this. He was saying those SDs WHO HAVE DECIDED need to announce....
or who are close to deciding, need to go ahead and decide. A # of superdelegates were not announcing but had made a decision, so Dean is requesting that they not hold their decisions to their chests until the convention, but rather, go ahead and make their positions known now.

A reasonable request. A reasonable thing for SDs to do.

That is all. No fix. Several SDs recently have decided to come out in the open...they were saying publicly they were remaining neutral, but according to them, they had really already decided. So they decided to go ahead and announce.

No fix. Obama has...the votes of the pledged delegates, the popular vote, the money. Hello! Anyone out there thinking that Obama NEEDS a fix, when he's winning fist over hand already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
57. If you don't want the delegates seated because of the rules
Edited on Sat Apr-05-08 08:13 AM by dogday
then apply the rules fairly.. Obama cannot claim victory until he has 2025, nor does he have any authority to call for Clinton to get out. That is also a rule and needs to be followed.. Can't pick and choose.. Both campaigns are doing some shifty things and I just can't seem to get behind either candidate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
59. No. It's Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-05-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
62. The fix was in when it became mathematically impossible for HRC to win
And that had nothing to do with the super delegates, just the peoples' votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-09-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
64. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC