Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The real democrat in the race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AmyStrange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 01:56 PM
Original message
The real democrat in the race

The real democrat in the race
By Jeff Jacoby | June 3, 2004

FROM: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/06/03/the_real_democrat_in_the_race/
FOR WHICH presidential candidate will James Baker, Brent Scowcroft, and Lawrence Eagleburger -- the foreign policy barons of the first Bush administration -- vote in November: For the one who shares their Kissingerian approach to foreign affairs, in which order and stability are more important goals than democracy and human rights? Or for George W. Bush?

It is an irony of the 2004 presidential campaign that the candidate who most nearly resembles Harry Truman and JFK in believing that Americans should "pay any price, bear any burden" to promote liberty and democracy in the world is the Republican incumbent, President Bush.

The Democratic standard-bearer John Kerry, by contrast, articulates a foreign policy that uncannily resembles that of George Bush the Elder. Like Bush I, Kerry has little patience for the idealistic "vision thing." He downplays the idea that the United States should be in the business of advancing freedom around the globe. Considerably more important, he suggests, is keeping the lid on trouble spots.

In a recent interview, The Washington Post reports, Kerry made it clear that "as president he would play down the promotion of democracy as a leading goal in dealing with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, China, and Russia. . . . He said securing all nuclear materials in Russia, integrating China in the world economy, achieving greater controls over Pakistan's nuclear weapons, or winning greater cooperation on terrorist financing in Saudi Arabia trumped human rights concerns in those nations."

<SNIP>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. The premise is that George Bush cares about democracy and human rights?
Edited on Sat Jun-12-04 01:59 PM by jpgray
This article is almost ridiculously delusional. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, Bush really cares about bringing democracy to Iraq
That's why he overthrew a democracy there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee, another smear piece by the Boston Globe!!!
What Librul Media???

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jeff Jacoby.....'nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree in part...
Edited on Sat Jun-12-04 03:05 PM by wyldwolf
Despite all the posturing by some here over what political label to put on Truman and JFK (and FDR and Johnson, for that matter), their foreign policy was, for the most part, that of intervention in foriegn conflicts to protect the interests of democracy.

However, that is a bit outdated today and to compare them to Bush II is a bit misguided. Whereas there are ulterior motives behind most wars, those motives in Bush's policies and the most transparent ever.

Kerry is taking the lead from Wesley Clark who believes that the future of the US military is humanitarian.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyStrange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree...

YOU SAID: "Kerry is taking the lead from Wesley Clark who believes that the future of the US military is humanitarian."

Although I disagreed with Kerry's IWR vote, I am encouraged and glad that Kerry is thinking this way and moving in that direction,

d

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC