Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For seven years we cried out for a "tough candidate". Now we can't handle it and we want her to quit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:03 AM
Original message
For seven years we cried out for a "tough candidate". Now we can't handle it and we want her to quit
I still want tough and hope it goes to the convention. The next 4 years are going to see $10 gas, no airline travel or airlines, food riots and bank failures. IMO, Hillary is the only one that is ready for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad she's just more of the same corrupt Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep. We don't need another Liar in Cheif only looking out for themselves.
And just telling us what we want to hear, as the wind blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
137. Thanks for kicking the thread.
with your irrelevant commentary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. She is tough, ready and knows how to use Washington to get it done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Get what done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
40. She'll use anyone to get "it" done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
68. That may be true.. but the problem is Washington
knows how to use her as well. THey have no idea what to do with Obama. I'd rather have a candidate that the Washington elite fears than one they embrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
72. She did a bang-up job on health care in the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #72
113. You forgot the sarcasm ~ her health care plan got no where
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #113
118. Hi, goclark. I did forget to put in the sarcasm emoticon, but that's
what I meant.

Bill put her in charge and to this hour there is no comprehensive health care policy for the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #118
120. Old Crusoe ~ you are so right! I remember it clearly
They came into office and she was center stage with her Health Care plan.

It was front and center.
Then poof!

It got no where.

And now she is older and still pushing herself around and being bossy.

She is not inclusive unless you are doing it "Their Way"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
76. If I wanted someone to "get 'er done" I'd call Larry the cable guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
152. But Hillary is DLC and DLC=Republican
and we want CHANGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
140. Too bad you are not in the real world
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 09:03 PM by JoFerret
unlike candidates Obama and Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama's too soft
All he's doing is fending off the Clinton machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
77. Fock! That's perfect. And smiling while he does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatsDogsBabies Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think Obama is a tougher candidate than HRC
just because he has a more reserved, less confrontational style, doesn't mean he's not tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
39. amen
Just because she's loud, doesn't mean she has what it takes in a moment of crisis. Bush talks tough too--but is he really? No, he's stubborn and narrow-minded. I'm not saying Hillary is those things, but I'm just saying she's crafted a media image like Bush has. I want the guy who doesn't resort to hyperbole--who doesn't boast that we can wipe Iran off the map, for instance.

Going to war with a recently armed nuclear power? Sure--bring it on! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
61. Tougher and more astute and principled.
By a long shot. Just because you jump up and down and scream the loudest does not mean you are tough. Hillary supporters need only to look as far and Bush to understand where that mentality has gotten the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
102. It's Gary Cooper (Obama) vs. John Wayne (Clinton).
Or Robert Mitchum vs. Edward G. Robinson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. I prefer honest. Tough is in the eye of the beholder.
Obama's restraint against a fellow democrat shows toughness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who is we? I cried out for someone the opposite of Bush, not a Democrat just like him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
144. Obama is more like Bush than Hillary. Folks have blinders on.
Obama is just smarter. But isn't he a uniter and not a divider? Wants to talk to everyone in the ME except Hamas. A healer, religious born again, addiction over-comer, greatly influenced by the pastor who converted him. Sounds a lot like Bush to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. She is the true fighter, and will NEVER back down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. yeah. real tough. she keeps punching herself in the face.
she doesn't have the chops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. In your oppinion. America does not agree. Obama can not close the deal.
Why is that? Oh, it has to be racism, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. lol he's closing it, dear. poor wittle hillykins. it's sexism
that's making the poor thing lose according to YOU and the endless whiny ass threads you post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Cali, I rarely post threads, you are your own personal echo chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #47
71. whether in threads or posts that's been a constant refrain.
and you threw nasty out. don't whine when you get it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #36
45. So constantly, if slowly, increasing your backing
.. is "not closing the deal".

Then what does not moving you numbers at all for half a year, constitute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. If Hillary is so strong, then why can't she close the deal. She's getting beat by what many of ....
her supporters believe to be a nobody. If he's so weak, then why is she behind him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
131. Obama can't close the deal? Hillary had a gigantic lead going into this year.
She can't close the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
42. She Will Take Us Down
in her never-ending fight. The AA community will never trust the Clinton's again after this - they won't vote for her in 2012 if that's her plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
70. Like she continued to keep health care reform in the spotlight in the 90s?
After she and Bill botched healthcare reform early in their term, the issue disappeared.

Where was Hillary then? Why didn't they keep it on the front burner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
103. Sun-Tzu disagrees with that idea.....
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sun-tzu/works/art-of-war/ch10.htm

"23. If fighting is sure to result in victory, then you must fight, even though the ruler forbid it; if fighting will not result in victory, then you must not fight even at the ruler's bidding."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
107. And that is the problem. There indeed comes a time to quit when you are losing, or
'loosing' for you Hillarybots.

Hillary is wasting valuable resources against the Democrat side that would be better spent against McCain and the Fascists.

Hmmm, "McCain and the Fascists". That sounds like a new rock grope... errr, group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. We Did?
If that's true, why is the hope guy winning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Don't confuse tough with dirty
we don't need another Bush wannabe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Tough, smart and SANE. Hillary only brings toughness to the table...
"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran".

That is a direct quote from Hillary Clinton. Does that sound smart or sane to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. You nailed it! SANE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Sane is good. I like sane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. You said it better than I did. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
95. Her obsession with toughness has sent intelligence and sanity packing.
This Iran quote is really beyond the pale.

Obama makes gaffes saying truths that are not politically popular.

Hillary makes gaffes saying foreign policy blunders that possibly affect our national security.

Hmm, which to choose, which to choose...this could be a tough one.

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. The question was if Iran nuked first what would be our response. You know that and you pretend that
the statement came out of the blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
43. The question was if Iran struck ISRAEL, not the US.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:19 AM by VolcanoJen
Big difference.

And it's not "sane" to obliterate millions of people and spread nuclear radioactivity throughout that region. And especially not if we have 150,000+ of our own soldiers sitting next door when Hillary Strangelove decides to show everyone how "tough" she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #43
145. More than just Israel...
She included other countries in the Mideast as well. This morning on CNN one of her surrogates said she means "friendly countries" in the mideast, like, oh say, Saudi Arabia. Who called her comments "foolish." As they are.

The Saudi paper called Clinton's nuclear threat "the foreign politics of the madhouse," saying, "it demonstrates the same doltish ignorance that has distinguished Bush's foreign relations."

This is just one of the many articles about the reaction in the world community.

http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/


It is important for people to understand it is not even necessarily WHAT she said, but HOW she said it. Not smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #30
50. Nuclear attack against the Mideast is an instance where one needs to chose their words carefully.
Things are taken out of context all the time. You don't think that terrorist groups are going to pull that quote out for their recruiting efforts?

And, considering the hornets nest that is the Mideast, I would expect every word to be qualified. But Hillary, no, she just throws shit out there without a second thought.

"Putin has no soul"
"The former Prime Minister of New Zealand" (+ tasteless, sexist joke that followed)
"If I'm President, we'll go to war with Iran"

Reckless, dangerous and just plain stupid things to say. At least Obama's gaffes have only threatened his candidacy. Hillary's gaffes threaten our foreign policy and, possibly, our safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. "All options are on the table", code speak for 60 yrs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #51
60. Then it's a shame that she said she would "obliterate them" instead of "explore all options".
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:29 AM by Kristi1696
She just defined her foreign policy as a nuclear one. And the Middle East is none too happy about it.

Here's what the Arab News (from Saudia Arabia-no friend to Iran, I might add) had to say about it:

This is the foreign politics of the madhouse. It demonstrates the same doltish ignorance that has distinguished Bush’s foreign relations. It offers only violence where there should be negotiations and war where there could be peace. At a stroke, Clinton demonstrated to everyone in this region that if she were the next occupant of the White House, Iraq-like death and destruction would be the order of the day.


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/04/iran-hillarys-t.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. Being "tough" does not equal being nasty and vindictive.
Hillary is like a big bully, running around yelling about how tough she is and using GOP tactics to smear her opponent. Obama is the toughness we need; resolute and self-confident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. She talks a lot about being tough nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. If she is so tough, then why hasn't she put forth legislation to investigate the
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM by Blue_Roses
gas gouging BEFORE it's risen this high? She mentions California and how they were gouged by Enron a few years ago and how they should have been investigated.

I don't really think she's done much at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. hillary's not tough in the ways that we need to win
she's fucking losing, genius. she can't get out of her own way. hapless hilly. Obama is far more strategic and tough than hapless hilly could ever hope to be.

And it's very unlikely to go to the convention. tough shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. Only if one confuses bullying + pandering with "tough".
AKA - triangulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. The sooner the better...she is not a tough candidate she is a lying
candidate...there is a difference..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. Tough?
I just picked this up from another post...it's spot on.

“One of the things that I learned in the school yard was: the folks that are talking tough all the time, they’re not always that tough. If you’re really tough, you’re not always looking to try to start a fight. If you’re really tough, sometimes you just walk away. If you’re really tough, you just save it for when you really need it,” Obama said.

That's tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. I don't want a President who threatens nuclear war for political gain.
I don't want a President who regularly lies big for her or her own political advantage.

And most of all, I want a President who is mature and secure enough to admit their own mistakes - even when it means that some might consider that "weak".

I do not want another President with the temperament of George Bush Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
23. If she's so tough, why can't she beat Obama and win the nomination?
By your own definition, when Obama wins the nomination, he'll have done so by beating the toughest candidate out there. Doesn't that make him... tougher?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. your confusing tough with stubborn selfishness - we've had that..for 7.5 years. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'm sure the Obama supporters know this fact....
Very seldom (if ever) do you hear Obama using; "me or I" when he is talking, he uses "us and we" whereas Clinton generally uses "me or I". May be a small thing, but one I have noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
49. I noticed that early on, too
That's a leader--he will lead the nation, not "work for" the nation. That's a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
27. We want her to be tough..
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:11 AM by sendero
.. on REPUBLICANS. See how that works, ye of very little brain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. The OP didn't call us names here. We shouldn't call them names. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
53. Alert me..
... I'm sick of idiots. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. We didn't cry out
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:11 AM by bowens43
for a deceiving, cheating, lying, arrogant, unethical, power hungry candidate. We have a very strong candidate.
Obama will easily defeat MCCain despite the best efforts of hillary and her supporters to stop that from happening.

BTW , we don't want her to quit, we want her to admit that she lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
32. She only fights for herself. When she could have fought for others she
stood down. No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. ding ding ding
And that's the most infuriating part about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
146. Amen!
Senator Byrd fighting against the invasion of Iraq is tough! She talks tough. MASSIVE difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
33. Tough or scurrilous? And a big, giant liar to boot.
Were she so tough, she souldn't have invented snipers at Tuzla Airport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. There are at least two kinds of 'tough': one is 'tough' as in 'able to withstand a lot of
wear and tear.' That would be Obama, with his cool and calm demeanor, inviting opinions from both sides of
any issue in order to ultimately come to a fair conclusion.

Then there's 'tough' as in 'This steak is so tough I can't chew it or swallow it. And I'd like my money back..."
Yeah - that sounds about right for Hillary, which has caused a lot of former Hillary supporters to decide that 'tough'
doesn't have to equal 'mean.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
35. She's not tough. She only talks tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
38. Self Destructive is not "tough"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
41. Tough?
Whatever, tough like Dubya. You can have your tough candidate but she isn't going to make it far. Tell you what though, too bad she wasn't tough when it came to fighting the Bush machine on this war, huh. Let us see here....... Tough to her Dem opponent by playing dirty and bitching every chance she gets opposed to tough to the bush machine who sent thousands to die in an unjust war for profit. Whatever, I love how you folks definition of tough. She didn't have the toughness to tell Bush to take his war and stuff it but she is tough because she if running a campaign like a Repig? Wow, I'm glad she is not my candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
48. Either of them is tougher than Gore and Kerry combined. Go team! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
52. Yes, and what was she doing in the Senate those long seven years?
Capitulating to neocons does not constitute a record of toughness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
54. Tough on the Republicans.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:26 AM by Crunchy Frog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
55. Sorry, but she isn't the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
56. There are many aspects to being tough; delusional and divisive are not desirable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
57. I want tough and smart and effective -- Not just tough and divisive
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:28 AM by Armstead
We've had eight years of tough and dumb in the White House.

We need someone who is tough in a "get things done" way. Not just tough for their own self-advancement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
58. CK, you know Obama is what we were waiting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
59. She's not tough, she's shrill. There is a big difference. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
62. You forgot pestilence and global contagion. And fire raining down from above.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:35 AM by Old Crusoe
"No airline travel" ? That doesn't sound right.

"No airlines" ? That doesn't sound right either.

Bank failures, maybe so, but we can likely withstand that with adequate prep and problem-solving.

Hillary is going to end food riots? That should be entertaining to watch. She can single-handedly feed the starving, in fact. She's always said she's good in the kitchen. She'll need to install a new sink, though. For some reason the old one's gone missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. With no oil and people with no money or jobs, how will there be any airlines? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. Look, my crystal ball's in the shop, but I think the airlines will still be
around.

8-track tapes, though, that's another story. They are on their way OUT. Mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #66
86. Eos Airlines Files for Bankruptcy, Plans to Shut Down Immediately


Source: WSJ

Eos Airlines Inc., a transatlantic, all-business-class airline, filed for bankruptcy protection over the weekend and said it will shut down Sunday, becoming the fourth U.S. carrier to go out of business this month.

Rising fuel prices, tight credit markets and the slowing economy are wreaking havoc on all U.S. carriers. But smaller, less well-funded companies are proving unable to withstand the challenges. Aloha AirGroup Inc., ATA Airlines Inc. and Skybus Airlines Inc. ceased operations earlier in April and Frontier Airlines Holdings Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection but continues to operate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #86
117. Ja, I read the news but corporate consolidation is not a recent
deveopment.

Any business will come under strain in hard times, here or anywhere else.

Smaller retail and grocery stores etc also go out of business for exactly the same reason, but there will continue to be small retial nad grocery stores through even a depression.

My hunch is that there will also be airlines and air flights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
63. Thanks for stopping by, KKKarl...
Hillary is Snipergate. That means toast.

She is not "tough", she is bitter that she lost and she and her husband could care less about the Democratic Party.

SHE LOST. That's not "tough"... that's "through".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
65. We didn't mean "tough" as in "Republican-faux-tuff"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
67. Dumbest post of the day
She's not fought Bush much at all.
She did not fight Gonzalez at all.
She did not fight the supreme court nominees
What the hell did she fight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
69. Not me.
I want a smart candidate able to move America forward and engage the world community. If we have to become republicans to compete with them I will find another party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
73. She is not "tough" she's a moral coward
She did not have the guts to vote against a war she knew was a mistake.

She's still afraid to stand up against the failed war because people might think she's "weak".

She and bubba have spent the past few months kissing McCain's ass.

She's strictly a potemkin candidate - all facade with nothing inside.

WTF is she gonna do about all these woes you describe? Think she'll crack down on the corporate interests that have given her $100 MILLION over the past 5 years? Dream on.

Any of the other democratic candidates would have been "tougher' than she is - for sure Obama is.

And now she's put her foot in it so bad she will probably face a significant challenge to her senate seat in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
74. Thanks for the post CK_John.
I will NEVER understand WHY D.U. hates Hillary, the toughest bitch on the block who will fight for us all.

She's exactly what we need.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #74
82. DAMN STRAIGHT! and, she will NEVER fold when counting the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
75. We said "tough" not PSYCHOTIC
You want it to go to the convention? Really you do? Is that your final answer?

THANK YOU! Thanks for revealing to the rest of us how demented and dangerous you are.

Contested nominations at conventions SPELL DEFEAT for whoever winds up with the nomination. You in your flaming neurosis think a contested convention is a vindication, the last best hope of the candidate who's "ready for the job"; but America looks at the party disunity onscreen and concludes No fucking way is that party ready to govern America!

By the way, Rush sends his thanks and regards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #75
87. I voted for McGovern and don't want to do so again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #87
134. Are you willing to destroy the Party for her ?
It's clear what you want - I'm asking you to realize that more than this year or the next four years are at stake. Much more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
78. She is my Senator
I've never seen her be tough on the side of NY. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. Hillary is Nasty But She is Not Tough

From Guy T. Saperstein


Hillary is a classic whiner. She and Bill whine about everything that doesn't go well for them. Unlike Harry Truman, who also said, "the buck stops here," she and Bill accept responsibility for nothing and blame others, especially the media, when things go wrong or their deceptions are exposed.ᅠ

Hillary and Bill whine about Democratic Party activists, young voters, running as a female, the media in general, the media catching her fabricating her history (bringing peace to Ireland, opposing NAFTA, facing sniper fire in Bosnia, etc.), the appeal of hope, Obama's eloquence, money, donors, Democratic Party rules. Last week, Hillary blamed the "activist base" of the Democratic Party -- and MoveOn, in particular -- for many of her electoral defeats, claiming, without a shred of evidence, that activists had "flooded" state caucuses and "intimidated" her supporters. Rather than accept responsibility for her campaign's well-documented failure adequately to plan for the caucus states, and despite her repeated claim she is the candidate "ready on Day One," she attacked core Democratic Party supporters. Rather than take responsibility for her inability to inspire the activist base with her ideas, she whined about their support of a more thoughtful, inspirational candidate. Candidates normally celebrate high levels of voter activism in the primaries, knowing these activists will work for the party's nominee in the general election, but Hillary is willing to burn the peasants in order to win the village for herself.

Hillary frequently whines about the media not being "fair." This is an old Clinton complaint, going back to her stone-walling about Travelgate, Whitewater and the revelations of Bill's many sexual shenanigans. How unfair of the press to remember that she supported NAFTA, falsely claimed to have been a key negotiator in peace talks in Ireland, and lied about her Bosnia trip.


Hillary whines about Obama's inspiration and eloquence. Hillary whines about the very nature of hope. Despite the Clintons' history of playing the Hope Card (we all remember Bill's 1992 campaign biopic, "The Man from Hope"), when the other guy is offering it, all of a sudden, hope is suspicious. In fact, it is downright delusional. "I could stand up here and say, let's get everyone together, let's get unified and the sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing, and the world will be perfect," she said in mock sarcasm of Obama's message of conciliation and hope.


Do we want a whiner to be President? Commander-in-Chief? Do we want to live through more chapters in the never-ending, but never-changing, Clinton Drama of Blame, Attack and Half-Truths? Or do we prefer a president who has demonstrated candor, who is willing to treat voters like adults, who takes responsibility for his behavior and offers thoughtful commentary on serious issues -- as Obama did with his former pastor? Do we want a president who behaves like a mature adult or someone whose emotional intelligence is on the level of a spoiled, whiny teenager?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/guy-t-saperstein/hillary-is-nasty-but-she_b_98719.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #78
91. 9/11 widows/widowers, police and firefighters would disagree with you
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:06 PM by ruggerson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
80. She's only tough when it's herself on the line.
She sure as hell wasn't this tough on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
81. This race is a dead heat because they are both tough.
I haven't seen two tougher candidates in a very long time. They are both up to the job,IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
83. No, sorry, I cried out for a candidate who would defend Constition and civil liberty...
Against the current assault on those.

What has Hillary said about investigating and prosecuting the members of Bush's Justice Department who put their stamp of approval on his torture policy?

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
84. If she had fought the Bush administration this hard she may have gotten my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
85. Clinton isn't a tough candidate, she is actually quite weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
88. Ready to what? Nuke Iran? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
89. What makes her "tough"? Someone needs to define that term. Because
if it means that she sticks to something in the face of criticism and long odds, that is exactly what Bushco has been doing for the past 7 years. "Sticking it out" doesn't equate to tough, if it's not tempered with the good of the whole as opposed to trying to prove yourself right, regardless of who or what is hurt in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
90. A tough candidate doesn't squeal that the rules are unfair, or blame the media for losing.
Hillary is far from a tough candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
92. Unfortunately, she only fights when SHE is the one at risk.
Where was all this tough rhetoric against Bush for all these years? Where was all this fighting? I saw NONE.

And where was Bill? Sucking it up with Poppy Bush...DISGUST doesn't begin to describe how I feel over this "I'm a fighter" claptrap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
93. We said TOUGH, not CROOKED
I want a candidate who is tough, strong advocate for our party's values and core beliefs. I never asked for a candidate who is solely a tough, strong advocate for herself and her own interests.

Hillary Clinton doesn't give a rat's ass about any party principles (IWR ring a bell?). She'd burn the whole party to the ground in order to secure a win for herself. She's made that clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #93
151. Well thank god
we have a candidate who has consistently voted against the war. Voted against every funding bill, used the senate rule and committees to consistently oppose he war and its architects.

Oh wait, Chris Dodd dropped out? Oh, well at least Obama makes nice speeches about the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
94. Tough vs. obnoxious...two different things.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
96. I want a tough candidate FOR US!! NOT for themselves!

BIG F'IN! DIFFERENCE! In some respects a tough candidate that fights for themselves and for their special interests cronies are WORSE than the wishy washy types that at some point in the future might be swayed over from the dark side to work for the people instead. They won't be leaders like others fighting FOR the people will be, but they will work OK when we DO have decent leaders working for us and NOT Korporate Amerika!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
97. It seems the party cannot handle "tough"
shortly after 9/11 I was talking to a friend, a lifelong dem from California, Joyce said she didn't expect to see another dem president in her lifetime because the dems just don't have the stomach for national security and that it would be the key issue for decades to come.

Hillary has stood against that charge, and her party will not support it.

I now think Joyce was right, she understands this party better than I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. You're talking about one of Sibel Edmonds' dirty dozen...
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:26 PM by calipendence
... and I think Sibel understands the problems with our national security from THE PEOPLE'S PERSPECTIVE better than any of us here, including your friend!

We've had enough of the "tough minded fear tactics" of pols like Bush to make us scared of what we don't understand and one that continues to hide the facts from us and works more for special interests than the people!

Hillary Clinton is not what we need now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
98. For seven years we cried out for a non-insider candidate. Now we can't handle it...
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:26 PM by ClassWarrior
...and we trash him like we're a Rape-Publican circle jerk on speed.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
100. She's fighting for herself, not for us
That is the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
101. But how much of that "toughness" has been directed at the enemy ...?
... as opposed to friendly fire?

Hillary would be doing much better if she'd actually shown any of this ferocity during the last 7 years, directed at the Bush administration and the Republican regime rather than going along with them on one of the more damaging votes in the country's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
104. Hillary isn't 'Rocky' tough
She is Joe Pesci in 'Goodfellas' tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
105. Actually
The tough guy got made fun of for being successful enough to afford $400 haircuts. He was talking about 'fighting' out of the gate yet all the Kumbayahers wanted their feel good candidates.

Now the Democratic Party has two feel good candidates to pick from and all of a sudden their longtime supporters (be it Clinton or Obama) want to invoke the word 'Fighter'.

Use anything - but don't use tough or fighter to describe what we've been left with.

Say she's steady and stands her ground - but she's just copying/lifting from Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highprincipleswork Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
106. I'd like strong over tough, especially when tough equals nasty.
I'm for Barack Obama because I he is plenty strong, just not ruthless in a selfish, ruthless, unprincipled way.

I abhor the divisive tactics of the Clinton campaign. I want a candidate that goes against the Republicans, not fellow Democrats. In my opinion, Barack Obama has done a much stronger version of this, although I wouldn't say he has been perfect for me either.

I believe that high principles do work and that they do win in the end. I'm betting on Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
108. "Why do I always get the first question?"
Yeah, real tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
109. I used to admire Hillary's "toughness."
Now she just seems desperate and a little bit megalomaniacal. For me, she's lost what credibility she had in the last few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpe diem Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
110. tough enough to take down the republicans...
...not tough enough to stamp her feet until she destroys the Democratic Party because she doesn't get her way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
111. for god sakes she is a coward. She is a spineless, yellow striped coward
slinging shit does not make one a fighter, it makes one a flinger of shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
112. LOL, we want a candidate that will starnd up to rethugs not be a rethug herself
and bash other democrats and endorse the opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
114. She's not tough in the way I want her to be.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 02:06 PM by OnionPatch
I would have wanted her to be tough against the RW bullying us into a war. Instead I see her giving in and going along with the RW spin way too often. The flag-burning amendment comes to mind offhand. Oh, and she just bashed the party activists last week, didn't she? How tough of her to attack the people who do the most work for her party but cozy up to someone like Richard Mellon Scaife. Sorry, she's not tough in the ways I need and want her to be tough. It seems to me that she's only tough when it comes to her own ambitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
115. tough, yes
but I want a Democratic nominee who ACTS like a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
116. I don't want "tough"
I want "willing to do the right thing". Hillary is not that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
119. Tough as in ruining the Democratic Party?
Or tough as in chumming up to Bush/Cheney, and letting them walk all over her. She won't win. Tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
121. Clinton for Change....that's all there is to say. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
122. You have a strange definition of tough
Let's do a comparison:
In HRC, we have a candidate, who has overreacted each time things looked even slightly bad for her. She was the inevitable nominee with a double digit lead when she and Bill called the normal criticism she got at the first Philly debate - swiftboating. It was not swiftboating. Bill Clinton was far less outraged when John Kerry was hit by millions of dollars backing lies than when his wife was said to have changed her answer --- because we all saw her do it. Kerry's own response was dignified and a clear cut, fact based denial of their charges before the Firefighters. He continued to run his campaign without letting the lies take over the campaign.

HRC has been near tears at least twice - because she was losing. Kerry never acted like that - ever. HRC and WJC have both showed a negative side where they are threatening people not behind them - Kerry never did that.

Then consider, HRC spoke at least 4 times of being under sniper fire in Bosnia. In 2004, Kerry NEVER spoke of being under sniper fire - the closest he got was to state that he still has shrapnel in his leg - if it weren't for the SBVT, he likely wouldn't have said that.
Now WJC supposedly thought Kerry, with a bronze star and a silver star spoke too much about Vietnam - yet, he defends HRC's flight of fancy that she was in danger.

Strength is NOT becoming like Karl Rove, strength is knowing that that is wrong and that we are better than that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
123. AMEN /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
124. We rent our clothing and wrung our hands
when Gore got rolled and Kerry got steamrolled.

Now so many are dancing because we have another rollee in Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. Against McSame I have no doubt he'll be "tough" but I'd rather have smart an live vs tough & stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #125
128. Obama is a brilliant man
Clinton is a brilliant woman.

Please make a note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
126. She might be a tough candidate, but what is her motive for running?
Why is she so tough? I don't think it's got a thing to do with the American people. The Clintons love power and the trappings of power. If she really cared about people who are hurting, she wouldn't be promising her healthcare reform by the end of her second term. What a convenient campaign issue that would be in 2012. "Keep me in office so I can provide universal healthcare." Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
127. there's a difference between tough and being a war-mongering brute...
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 05:48 PM by Ysabel
- if that's not clear yes i'm calling hillary a brute (and as someone else mentioned above i agree she's a shit-slinging coward she is not tough)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
129. Seems to me we wanted a tough PROGRESSIVE candidate
Not triangulation...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
130. She continually whines and plays the victim
that's not being "tough".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
132. I don't want a candidate who acts like a REpublican
She uses REpublican tactics to fight.

To heck with that.

If she somehow steals the nomination, I'll vote for her, but nothing else. I would love nothing more than to donate to the DNC right now, but I cannot so long as any possibility whatsoever that she will be the nominee remains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
133. Tough, as in in fight for what's right. When has Clinton fought for anything other than herself?
And how is campaigning like a Republican tough? Despicable would be a better term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
135. Where was she and her 'tough' act the last 7 years? Sabotaging OTHER Democrats for BushInc.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 07:00 PM by blm
You want her rewarded? So does BushInc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
136. Only the Fraidy-cats want her to quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
138. Rovian tactics do not equal toughness.
They equal cowardice and projection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
139. She's tough on Dems and soft on Rethugs
No Dem who uses Rethug framing all the time can get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
141. Tough? Lying and low-ball tactics are not tough. Neither is desperation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
142. Tough doesn't mean talking tough...
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 06:11 AM by graycem
I have been praying for a SMART and DIPLOMATIC President. If your only tool is a hammer, everything becomes a nail.


Exhibit A: President Bush - "Bring it on!" Tough? Hardly. Stupid? Most definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
143. Logan's Law: anything a Clintophobe says about a Clinton is a lie.
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 06:17 AM by Perry Logan
There is clearly a screw loose with the anti-Clinton people--the "Clintophobes" who infest our fine forum. When they start talking about the Clintons, their heads practically spin around. You are a fool to believe a single word they say--at least until you change the subject.

A short time at DU will verify this sad MO: Clinton-bashers make false accusations about the Clintons, believe them, then repeat them endlessly. I don't know how they can do this, but they do.

They put all the debunkings and disproofs on ignore, and read only the responses of people who share their affliction. How clever is that?

In this way they create a political Bizarro World in which the Clintons are the bad guys. It creeps out DUers all the time:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5120659

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4779500&mesg_id=4779500

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4849238&mesg_id=4849238

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4922044&mesg_id=4922044

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4942967&mesg_id=4942967

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4964704&mesg_id=4964704

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4965088

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4965227

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4982708&mesg_id=4982708

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5036756

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5065868&mesg_id=5065868

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5156352&mesg_id=5156412

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5165104&mesg_id=5165104

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5180133&mesg_id=5181094

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5195072&mesg_id=5195072

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5204441&mesg_id=5204441

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5214352&mesg_id=5214352

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5226313&mesg_id=5226313

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5235825&mesg_id=5235825

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5304883

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5349292&mesg_id=5349292

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5392998&mesg_id=5392998

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5431535&mesg_id=5431535

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5431076&mesg_id=5431076

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5502064&mesg_id=5502064

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5571092&mesg_id=5571092
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
147. She is a lying, calculating witch! It would be a disgrace
to all women to have her as the first female president. There are many more women that could be commander-in-chief and make us proud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
148. Agree, and we decried political leaders who waffled and dodged
and used spin instead of substance to discuss critical issues and their polices.

Some folks have really lowered the bar to support DU while turning Hillary into a punching bag.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
149. HRC's not tough, she's had it handed to her ... she's a shameless bully.
I hope she loses her Senate Seat in addition to The Democratic Nomination.

Her bile filled speeches make HRC most worthy to lose it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
150. I would like to see a candidate who's tough against the Republicans
Not one who's joining in with them to destroy another Democrat.

All Democrats are very good at the circular firing squad but when it comes to standing up to the bully tactics of the GOP they quiver and quake like scared little puppies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
153. Go Hillary!
Thanks for your post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
154. It's all well and good to have a tough candidate - if they fight for the right things
we had a tough as nails candidate in Howard Dean, but he got kneecapped by the same establishment that wants Hillary so desperately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
155. Triangulation is capitulation. How is that tough? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC