Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

8/4 KERRY WIN PROBABILITY: 96.65% ; VOTE: 52.78% ; EV:322

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 01:32 PM
Original message
8/4 KERRY WIN PROBABILITY: 96.65% ; VOTE: 52.78% ; EV:322
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. This Race Is Going To Be Close
I want Kerry to win with every fiber of my being but to sit here and say there is a 96.65% of a Kerry win ninety days before the election with American troops all over the world and terror alerts springing up like weeds is just plain silly...


There are too many opportunities for events to change the dynamic to use a static model....


Peace 04


Brian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You are incorrect. The model is NOT static. I update it almost daily
with new data. The purpose is not to predict, but to show the changing probabilities of a win. This is the best way to eliminate the volatility of small daily changes in the states which can have a big effect on the EV.

For instance, say Kerry is ahead by 51-49 in FL with a 60% chance of winning. If he falls behind by 49-51, it will not effect his average EV by +/-27 votes, since he still has a probability (40%) of winning the state and will win approximately 40% of the trials. His average EV may drop by 2.

Your argument is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You Couldn't Submit Your Model To One Political Science
professor in the country and get him or her to endorse it...

Do it and I'll retract my statement...


You are basically saying Kerry's going to win in November, errrrrrrrr, wait there's a 97% chance he will win...

Lots of things can happen between now and November and even if you are saying based on polling that if the election was held tomorrow Kerry would win that wouldn't be true because there are fluctuations is the various polls and neither Kerry or Bush have large enough leads in the states to give them an Electoral College vote majority...Neither Kerry or Bush have leads outside the margin of error in enough states to give them 270 Electoral College votes...

I realize you like to do these exercises but they are pretty sloppy social science.

As Larry Sabato, professor of Government at the University Of Virginia says " This (election) is close. Anyone that believes this election can not go either way is too partisan to be helped."

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/2004/president/electoratemap.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sabato is unquestionably pro-Bush.
If you've ever listened to him on Fox, you would know what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I Don't Care About Sabato's Bias...
I just question the efficacy of the seminal poster's model....


He might as well ask the magic eight ball who will win....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You know, it's ok to disagree
but you're getting a little harsh in your comments here. Lay off the poster. You disagree. Point made. Drop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You Need To Read The Whole Thread...
Maybe I was a bit harsh but his model is as useless or useful as a ouija board....


If the poster really believes there is a 96.65% chance of a Kerry win he should sell all his belongings and lay it on a Kerry win at Harrahs or Vegas....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't NEED anyone's endorsement, not even yours.
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 03:52 PM by TruthIsAll
I have been following elections since 1952.

How many have you witnessed?

I have three degrees in mathematics. How many do you have?

I was the first one on DU to warn about the Repuke voting machines

Point out one mathematical error in the model. If you want to get into a theoretical discsussion regarding the statistical methodology, be my guest.

Otherwise, as Teresa would say:

Shove off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "I Have Three Degrees In Mathematics"
Well I better back off....


I'm not going to get in a pissing match about credentials on an internet chat board....


Again... I issue my challenge.... Find one political science professor in the nation that will endorse a model of voting behavior that says that on this day there is a 96.65% chance that will Kerry will win an election that will be held in November.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yeah, I would be interested if you could get ANY Poly-Sci professor
to back this up. I've always been in awe of the amount of mathematically ability and dedication to the numbers, but overall, I think it's a waste of your time. So many different things can happen between now and Nov. 2nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I Am Sorry For Some Of The Harsh Things I Said
but these deterministic models are silly....



You can not control all the intervening variables or to use layman's language alot of shit can happen between now and election day....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Truth is all
I don't think the things you said were harsh. I agree with everything you are saying. Like the poster says himself, Truth is all, even if it hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I Wish He Was Right.....
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 07:11 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
I Wish He Was Right....


I Wish He Was Right...


"......"


Ad Infinitum.....


But none of us know what will happen on Election Day...


This isn't like 72, 84, 92, or 96 when we had a good idea of what will happen ; bad or good....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheelhombre Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did this predictor exist in 2000?
And how did it do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hi Tarheelhombre!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, I have been working on the model over the last month
My only forecast assumption is the allocation of the undecided/other vote to Kerry.

Otherwise, the model relies on statistical probabilities, using the latest available state polling data from electoral-vote. com and 15 national polls from PollingReport.com.

Obviuousy, the probability, Vote% and EV forecasts change when I update the input (at least weekly, but maybe more often) as the new data becomes available..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Your conclusion is not supported by your methodology.
The most you could say is that if the election were held on the days of the polls, the chances of a Kerry victory that day would be x% (if the assumptions made in sampling error and turnout are approximately correct or if the bad assumptions cancel each other out).

It's a long way to November, and I suspect there will be times when Bush will be ahead in the state and national polls. I wouldn't put any money on Kerry as a 1:19 favorite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC