Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swift Boat ads - they didn't "backfire" when they ran them against McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:11 PM
Original message
Swift Boat ads - they didn't "backfire" when they ran them against McCain
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 06:12 PM by Democat
They worked.

Let's not fool ourselves.

Unless Kerry does something very specific and effective to fight this, these ads will hurt Kerry, not Bush.

Look what these same criminals did to McCain in the primaries.

Don't buy the bullshit line that Americans don't respond to negative ads - they always have and probably always will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DaveFL99 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice guys finish last
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Nice Guys Don't Always Finish Last
John McCain came out and blasted the Ads, and some conservative leaning websites have reacted by retracting their postings.

One such Website, which I monitor on a regular basis, is the Election Projections site 2004, which just posted a 'conditional retraction':

"If you have been a reader of this site for long, you know that I am interested in the truth above all else when it comes to the content of this site. I painstakingly strive to espouse only that which I believe is the truth. Sometimes the truth hurts; sometimes it is ugly. Sometimes it even means calling into question the military service of a decorated Viet Nam veteran such as Senator Kerry.

Sometimes, however, it also means retracting a post when enough doubt is cast on the veracity of the information contained in it. I do not condemn the Swift Boat Veterans and their anti-Kerry ad as Senator John McCain does, but, in response to McCain's statements and other feedback I've received from readers, I do feel compelled to remove my earlier post affirming them. Consider it a conditional retraction because if more comes to my attention concerning their activities, whether positive or negative, I will respond accordingly."

This is a lot more than we could expect from the likes of Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and the rest of the Republican Noise Machine.

Anyway, If you want to see an election projection from the other side of the fence, here is the website:

http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html

Amazingly, the guy has been projecting a Kerry win for the past six months or more, even though it galls him no end. He is still a Rabid Right-Wing Republican Supporter, but at least the posted election projection numbers seem to be honest at the moment.

And he did pay attention to McCain when the Senator came out against the add.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thanks Xipe
and welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sad but TRUE. Slime sticks better that pure spring water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think the counterattack has begun
McCain's statement today has already put the WH on the defensive, forcing them to pretend to repudiate the ad. Kerry is not Michael Dukakis. I'm sure his campaign knew this was coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Look for the Kerry camp to slam them on this one.
Not doing so would be a big mistake and they surely know it and will respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. McCain
came to the rescue. Sometimes he wears a red cape, sometimes a white hood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. I don't believe McCain was coming to the rescue....
....I think he set this up so that the Bushies could "agree" with him, and then they added the lame statement that all the independant group ads should be repudiated and Kerry should join them. I'm no McCain fan, regardless of his "independant" leanings, he's a conservative through and through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Most of the people..........
never found out about the lies until it was too late. The DNC is all over this like stink on shit and the press is ACTUALLY REPORTING IT!
I think it will bite the Cons in the ass before it's all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree..McCain had to count on the media in SC to correct it and they
didn't...how many states is this ad playing in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveFL99 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. That's the problem
it becomes national now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Right but the news IS correcting it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. McCain didn't have "a McCain" denouncing them
And Bush hadn't fucked up the world the way he has now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Boston Globe Political Columnist on Franken's show said
That whenever an opponent attacked Kerry's war record, Kerry always won. And it was mostly due to his "band of brothers". They don't take no shit from anyone and they fight back.

I think Kerry's campaign will crush these swiftboat vets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yup that's already been proven once in this campaign
Kerry's numbers went up the first time the Swift Boat Scumbags attacked. The idiots just can't help themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. They were more stealth with McCain
After the huge beating he put on the "Selected One" in NH they did their dirty deed in South Carolina with phone push polling slyly putting out the dirt on McCain. Get the book or DVD Bush's Brain - it's about that bastard Karl Rove and how he got * in Texas to beat Richards and how he screwed McCain to get * the Repug nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddem43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. A WH spokesman said they do not question Kerry's service
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. in New Hampshire
that year the attacks came in the form of push polls and no one stood up for McCain. This time, McCain is standing up for Kerry. The fact that a respected person of another party, who is backing another candidate, is standing up for Kerry makes a huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. B.S. Almost everything they do is fraudulent and manipulative. Should we
now believe a repeat of the "WE KNOW NOTHING" dodge they used when the
same hit squad acted on their orders to assasinate John McCain's
presidential campaign??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bucknaked Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Also, the attacks against McCain were also during the R's primaries...
...these bogus attacks are occuring against a DNC-nominated Presidential candidate, who now has an entire party behind him. Unlike McCain's unfortunate run-in with this same type of crowd, Kerry has his entire (respective) party behind him (many of whom, are Vets), and more importantly, people who've actually served under him, people who were there, disputing these outright lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kerry surrogates need to connect the ads to Bush.
These ads are an example of how Bush always campaigns. He needs to be forced to comment on the ads.

Another thing to remember is that when Bush lied about McCain's service, it was during a republican primary. Nothing appeals to republicans like hate filled lies. That is why Bush spread the rumor that McCain had a "black" daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. No WAY! TOTALLY DIFFERENT AUDIENCE!!! Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 06:47 PM by Beetwasher
No dis, but you're totally wrong! They accomplished the campaign against McCain in ONE SOUTHERN STATE and only needed to convince REPUBLICANS!!! It's TOTALLY different! Also, he no longer has the credibility to pull this off. No one believes him anymore, according the almost EVERY poll, Kerry is AHEAD in the credibility dept. This shit don't fly when you no longer have ANY credibility.

They will LOSE ALL THE MODERATE SWING VOTERS with this negative bullshit.

This could spell DOOM for the Bush campaign.

I LOVE THESE ADS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. I want to be wrong on this one, but if it works in the "swing states"
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 08:48 PM by Democat
Isn't that enough?

If someone still supports Bush after all we've seen, I find it very hard to believe that they are going to change their vote because someone on the right goes after Kerry like this.

On the other hand, I don't find it hard to believe that a certain number of people who are on the fence in the middle of the country will see this and it will reinforce what the media has been telling them - Kerry is a liar and a flip flopper and now he's lying about Vietnam.

I do not think this is going to "backfire" on its own. I think it's possible for Kerry's people to turn it around, but they better have a perfect plan and execute it quickly.

Isn't this the month that Kerry said his campaign will be completely dark on ads? If we wait 30 days to respond, that will be far too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. It's Already Backfired
Even Fox News commentators are denouncing and the WH is distancing itself from the ad. It's a disaster for them...Have you seen it? It's and obvious and horrendous hit piece. The only people who might believe it are Bush's insane base. Moderates and swing voters are notorious for their disgust of this type of negative smear job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. They worked against Southern Republicans. Need we say more? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveFL99 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. Christ I really hope you guys are right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hair in my Nose Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Willie Horton
This is Willie Horton deja-Vu!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. They think that if something worked once it always will
This was as predictable as death and taxes. Kerry's campaign was ready for this. the DNC was ready. McCain probably gave a little thought ahead of time to what he'd do when it happened. When it was McCain, not too many people even knew who he was. Cleland was in a state race and that wasn't under a national microscope. This was a huge blunder, or maybe gamble on the part of the Republicans. It was either a mistake or they're so desperate that it was worth a shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #25
45. Old adage: "Never Play The Same Game Three Times Running"
1st time: Willie Horton
2nd time: John McCain in South Carolina primary
3rd time: Swift-boat ad.


Time's up, 'Pukes.


:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsMyParty Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. This contains some real juicy possibilities for Kerry and the DNC
The key is to point out that it was the SAME band of scumbags that went after McCain---we know that, but the general population doesn't know either that it was done to McCain and/or that it was these same guys. Once that tie is established it paints a bad picture of Bush and the republicans. They can't pretend that this is some "out of the blue" attack. It starts to smell that they are into this up to their armpits. It looks like Bush is hiding his record, or his AWOL problem, etc. but trying to dishonor a veteran. (and the person above who said that Rove and Company always return to what worked before if right on the mark---thus, Teresa is a definite target; that's why it's important to jump on this now so that they have to think twice about starting the crap on Teresa that they did to McCain's wife and Dukakis' wife, etc.). Come on Kerry campaign, make the connection and put Bush right in the middle of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I like it- it will force the media to ASK McCain about his situation...
...I hope the DNC is on the ball...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. The difference is that people know the Chimp now
and they see the results. He's defeating himself as much as Kerry is defeating him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. Time to bring out the AWOL stick again. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defoliant Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. the fact they only bought a few airings is meaningless
The networks are playing it up. Kerry needs to put the guys from his boat on the tube. And the 527s have to fight fire, like by going after Bush on the AWOL issue -- see

www.rawstory.com

for great ammunition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdguss Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. They worked in South Carolina:
It wasn't just the horrible ads that belittled McCain's noble, honorable and distinguished service to our country, it was racist ads implying that McCain had fathered an daughter with an Asian mother (the truth is he adopted an Asian daughter).

It was below low. So is this. McCain is right to call them on it. The White House's press release shows exactly who is behind this one. This has Karl Rove's finger prints all over it. The Cleland ad. The racist ads against McCain, the smears against McCain's record, the ad up in New York paid for by two individuals (which is where the coordination ban comes from in the first place). The guy is doing a disservice to our country and our politics by peddling such shit as those ads. It feeds into cyncism that causes people to take their most precious right--the right to vote--lightly.

Bush should be ashamed. He clearly released it trying to get people to criticize third party ads, and get gentleman's agreement to ban them from the campaign. Of course, he only wants that because he scheduled his convention unnecessairly late, and it would give him a huge advantage. Bush and his henchmen are playing cynical games. Slandering someone's war service in order to gain a fiscal advantage is pathetic.

And people wonder why George W. Bush is so disliked by millions of Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Bush promised to be a uniter and he continues to divide America
Another broken promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Correction
Edited on Fri Aug-06-04 08:22 AM by gtrump
The BS about "McCain's dark-skinned daughter born out of wedlock" was actually a push-poll done mostly to little old ladies and fundie Democrats. It wasn't an ad because that would have involved a modicum of honesty and courage. What they did was far more crooked and insidious.

What galls me about it is conservatives I know, when I bring it up, saying things like, "They never proved a link to Bush's campaign," as if it mattered.


On edit: wording
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RummyTheDummy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
35. Wrong.
Reasons they worked -- it was barely reported on, much less by the mainstream media at the time. The merit of these ads is actually being debated. Even my own local wingnut NBC affiliate was poo-pooing them today.

Second, the tactics employed against McCain were used primarily in a state (South Carolina) that isn't the most culturaly advanced in the union. Lots of dumb fundie christians. It also took place in a vacum and in relative secret. Other parts of the country won't be so tolerant to these tactics.

Third, you fail to account for Bush's cash/resources advantage over McCain in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. And Don't Forget the PUSH POLLING
That accompanied the ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
36. Pitting Kerry's " Band of Brothers" vs the GOP's "Band of Boneheads"
...we win in a laydown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rev. Day-Bu Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Ditto
I was going to post essentially the same thing.

The Kerry camp should--and probably will--put together a counter-ad featuring Rev. Alston, Jim Rassman, and all the other guys who really DID serve with him. And the ad should not only show that Kerry's service was great, but should directly counter the "Smear Boat Veterans" ad by pointing out that none of these guys actually served with or knew Kerry, and the "doctor" (if he's even a doctor) who claims he treated Kerry didn't actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
38. well then maybe Kerry better get an ad on the air re: W's AWOL
status--fair is fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
40. Smears worked vs McGovern, McCain and Max Cleland but finally
there is acknowledgement in the media of the history of disgraceful RW smears of their political opponents' distinguished wartime records. The RWingers know that it has worked in the past starting with WW II hero McGovern whose patriotism was questioned when he ran against Nixon.

As long as only rabid RWingers like Hannity and Scarborough and Rush support the smear attack, it could backfire. Very good news today that media is covering story of how Kerry's flip-flopping commanding officer who recommended him for the Silver Star and supported him in 1996 now regrets participating in the smear and retracts his statements against Kerry.

Excellent timely letter appeared today in Asheville N.C. paper why Kerry should not have to spend his time and money defending these kind of attacks.

http://www.citizen-times.com/cgi-bin/article/letters/59182.shtml

Kerry needs immediate support from prominent military men such as Wes Clark.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Just a court room trick
Isn't it the 'planting' of a raunchy thought that is being done here. Even if it is disproved the feeling lingers and the damage is done.
I suggest that the nasty taste of perjury be legally tasted by those who testified to this lie. This should be proven to be libel or slander by our righteous lawyers.
To the pious crowd I say, breaking the commandment of baring false witness is a sin that should be brought to light and witnessed to. Make it known that Godly people don't ruin reputations with falsehoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
41. But also, just because something worked once, it may not work again.
We don't know who these ads will hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC